Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion, week of September 21


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Again, because I get accused of cheerleading...I agree with every word you say above. ALL I am saying is that there were positive standout moments for me this week...and (unlike you and most others at SON) that was actually enough for me.

Again, totally correct. But now (small contrivance) Adam is "free", and he's starting to mix it up. I think they will now begin to correct the disconnection. It seems to me that Adam's "unredeemable" acts (like Victor's imprisonment of a rival in his basement, where he fed him rats) are all about setting the template for Victor the Second. Muhney has not yet been allowed to show many colors beyond his plotting. That said, I think he has done especially well playing the "I'm sorry" subtext with Eileen.

I don't think we're ever going to see Adam find Jesus and fight for the cause of peace.

I do think he's going to be in a relationship with Ashley. (No spoiler, just obvious speculation). And I do think he's going to fall in love with her. And I do think that is going to make him desperate to keep concealing all the horrible things he has done. I think Adam for the next few years is going to be like Phyllis in her early years--a constant desperate attempt to keep his dirty secrets under wraps.

I wonder if they will even reference Adam's "experimentation" with another boy?? It seems to me that is something Ashley needs to know before she embarks on her love-life with Victor Adam Newman!

I'm totally on board with the general consensus that these "nutso-freako-unhinged crazy" twists should not have occurred.

I am totally in disagreement that this has any long-term implications.

For Patty, it seems clear to me that we'll find out she had an abusive relationship in Eau Claire and elsewhere (maybe more than one) and that it twisted her further. She was disfigured and near the edge of reason when Victor found her. Then, this took a girl who basically started out as weak and unhinged (Patty shot Jack), was rendered further nuts by isolation and abuse, and then loaded and twisted by Victor. I think she'll be off canvas, treated, and come back for a "healing arc". I welcome this. I welcome her desperate attempts to make amends and rebuild her life. (I also like Kevin Fisher, at least until the Chipmunk).

For Adam, I think the road is harder. I hope the show has the balls to basically NOT "redeem" him, but to have him show his "Hope" side, and to play that battle. I want to see his loving of Ashley (so wrong, but it feels so right) make him struggle to be a better man.

I also think (as I have said before) that I think this is an easy story to write if they want. I think stepdaddy Cliff was secretly abusive, and threatened to kill Hope if Adam didn't keep quiet and also have sex with him behind the barn. Blind Hope could have missed this...but it also would have twisted Adam...made him very compartmentalized and...yes...a little sociopathic.

But, as an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse, it could lead to the ultimate redemption and healing. And yes, those are the kinds of stories I love to see. Growing stronger through adversity....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 308
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have no intention of watching Adam and Ashely in any relationship after he burnt her unborn fetus, mislead her that she was still carrying it, and tortured her for MONTHS, and yes, mind raped her. The writing for women is already problematic on this show, I don't need to see anything like that.

Adam needs to written off as going to prison for a while like Michael. Only the character can only come back with a better recast, Michael Muhney isn't cutting it.

Too bad the stories aren't made of win. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked seeing Traci/Ashley and Traci/JT at Colleen's bedside. Traci/Ashley holding vigil was particularly touching. IA that there were a lot of good moments this week. It was enough to make me glad I was watching. I just wish their were more of those kinds of scenes and that they lasted longer. I don't know. Maybe I've fallen into the ranks of soap fans that are just never happy, but I just can't helping thinking there should be more of the family scenes and less of some of the gruesome stuff.

I'm also really annoyed that Nikki seems to be giving Victor a pass, but that is completely in character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark, the problem for me in any area involving Adam/Ashley, that takes it beyond a realm of disbelief you have to have for soaps, is that for months, Adam had her examined by a man who had a history of molesting and violating his female patients. I have a feeling that perhaps someone at Y&R did not quite see this as something which was a big plot point, I think they just decided they could use that as the reason since he was an OBGYN, but any reason they may give for the man Adam has become, I still can't get that out of my head.

I guess one can say that being a soap viewer means accepting awful things before a couple gets together, but never have I seen anything like this. It would be like Eden Capwell getting involved with the gynecologist who raped her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Point taken IRT Jack. However, I think the characters can drive plot without going off the deep end. It's called more intelligent writing and we're not seeing that on Y&R these days.

Mark - I so enjoy reading your speculative back-stories for the characters on this show. And the ones you have written above for Adam and Patty would be great to watch. However, given the history of these writers I'm not so sure they will even bother to fill us in on why Adam and Patty have become who they are. I'm saying that because historically, these writers have never shown any interest in giving filling in the pieces of the characters for us. Adam, Patty, Chance, Mac, Murphy, Phillip III have all huge gaps of time that have never been account for. Why is that? The only time I have witnessed them attempting a backstory is for characters that have already an established one like Kevin or Devon (and barely that for Devon).

IA Julia. Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't have picked what you're describing...but I'm already (personally) seeing Muhney and Davidson transcend it. The burgeoning relationship I perceive would not have worked with Engen--that would have seemed more like a "mother/son" dynamic. With Muhney, the chemistry is right there (IMO).

Totally agree with what you write above!

Well, we have no evidence that Taylor was a molester.

What we have is Adam saying his dead friend Skye ALLEGED this.

I realize that if there were nothing there, it seems implausible that Taylor would be playing along. But on the other hand, how can Taylor prove he DIDN'T molest the dead girl?

Again, I would never have put in that molestation bit. Since Skye was into financials, I would say "Skye gave me specific evidence that you defrauded health insurance companies and Medicare over and over again". That would have achieved the same goal without the "yuck".

But it could be that Dr. Taylor is just afraid of a besmirched reputation, and is therefore acquiescing. As for Adam...for all we know (if the molestation is not true)...he MADE UP Skye's allegations.

I like John Rubenstein, and from what I can tell, his subtext for Taylor is actually compassion and a moral compass. So he's been playing against the writing, and that has also worked for me. Putting it all together, I have never believed in that molestation bit.

But, again, I fully admit it was a mistake to write that bit. I am not, however, "stuck" on it, because I think it could be false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a show with so much gore and mismatched couples, you really want THESE writers (that botch everything) to go in that direction?

I'm afraid Maria or one of her hacks just read you idea and this will in fact pop up on the show in 4 months time. It wouldn't be the first time.

I don't care if actors have chemistry, the integrity of their characters should come first. There is no way in hell Ashley should/could forgive Adam for all he's done to her.

And again, Muhney and his cartoon antics stick out for me. He's very flat and one-note.

Send Adam to prison off screen for a year or two and then recast! :)

But I'm afraid is too caught up in herself and trying to stick it to Engen that she'll continue to push Muhney, no matter how lame his acting is or her and her henchmen's writing for him is,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This made me laugh Mark. :lol: I mean, yes she should know, but it's so far down on the list of things Ashley needs to know before she gets involved with Adam (if she ever does and I'm hoping she doesn't). First she needs to know that he has been trying to drive her insane. That he wore Sabrina's clothes to do it, that he helped Patty, that he let her think she is pregnant after causing her miscarriage, that he let a questionable doctor treat her, let her think she killed Nikki and Sabrina that every word he's said to her in the last 6 months is a huge freaking lie!!. Good god, the list is a mile long. A little Ho-Yay with Rafe hardly even rates on a list Ashley needs to know before she goes there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even if the doctor isn't actually a molester/rapist, Adam thinks he is. The only way this might work is if Adam reveals he knew the doctor had never done anything and he framed the doctor. But I think they're just going to forget about this.

Does anyone else think it's kind of sad that after years and years of Nick and Sharon being so caught up in Cassie's death, they barely seem to be bothered about Traci losing Colleen? Instead it's more of the usual poor poor Victor, savior of us all. If I needed any confirmation of the self-absorption and elitism from these two, I got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But like I said before... it shouldn't MATTER waht's been with Colleen in the past, your emotion and sadness can just as easily come from your feelings for the character of TRACI, not Colleen. I have always had a huge emotional attachment to Traci, but I suppose if you didn't watch in her main character buildup (1983-87) maybe you might not feel that. But a person SHOULD be able to watch and at least get SOME enjoyment out of good, heartfelt scenes, even if what came last week didn't float your boat. I mean, how the hell do you watch a movie? You've only got 90 minutes, there... no buildup, no months of character development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This story hasn't been ABOUT Traci though, and as much as I love her, she's not enough to make it work when the overall story is so meaningless and doesn't pack any sort of emotional punch for me. Mark had similar feelings, and he's been watching since the 70's.

Movies are an entirely different format than daytime, that's how.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy