Jump to content

Y&R: Interview with Tonya Lee Williams


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hey guys, so I got the chance to interview Tonya Lee Williams the other week. We discussed her upcoming role on CBC's "The Border". Daytime wise, she talks about what it would take to launch a successful soap in Canada and I also got her take on the reasoning behind stunt storylines on Y&R.

I hope you guys enjoy it. My blog at Dose.ca has the full interview (which covers the soap portion) here. While Canada.com has the 'Border' focus here.

Here's an excerpt regarding the Y&R stuff:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I know she's just trying to keep her job, so this isn't a criticism of her.

The excuse which is often used for bad pacing on soaps is that the audience just can't handle longer stories. I have always had a hard time believing this. The idea is often that soap fans are now too stupid to understand anything so let's just throw out everything as fast as we can. I think this is just laziness from the people in charge.

Y&R relies on shock value but even worse than shock value is they do not care about playing any beats. So we get months and months of absolutely nothing with Ashley other than Adam terrorizing her and Ashley acting crazy.

Or we get Phillip's return, where the entire story was rushed through in two weeks and now he hangs around doing nothing. That isn't the audience's fault. They didn't ever expect him to be brought back and have it treated as a nonevent.

And there are other sick parts of the Ashley story which have nothing to do with demanding fans, like Ashley repeatedly being examined by a man who molests his patients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is true. I've always thought part of the fun of soaps is keeping up with the characters, keeping everything straight, and usually having INTRIGUE. I think if anything the onus is on the shows themselves to put updates and summaries and history on their WEBSITES (I miss ABC's yearly summaries from the beginning of OLTL and AMC. I read them completely before starting to watch the show) Luckily with Wikipedia and Google searches you can find what you're looking for, but who's that invested anymore? :( I do like that Sony's site (wow I remember when that was soapcity... long time ago that was!) has the Y&R summaries from 1973.

At least on the ABC pages they used to have a thing where it tells you what's going on with just the background on the stories.

It's nobody's fault but their own new people aren't watching soaps cause of the popular misconceptions about Daytime and what connotations "Soaps" have begun to take on, and them not making it easy for new people to get into it. To the networks: You have the internet, put it to good use and promote your shows the way u should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"... It's drama at it's fittest ..."?!?!?!

I don't want to repeat anything Carl has already said (quite well), but I would have a hard time believing that any true soap fan wants a story to happen in a WEEK.

Y&R's pacing is soooo off - either very rushed (like Devon/Tyra, the Deacon mess) or way too slow (the gaslighting). Can't they find a happy medium? If the writers had any talent whatsoever, they would be able to play out a story within a few months, play the beats and get people invested in the story. No one is going to care when you have a character like Amber threatened AND raped in one day by some guy that just showed up in town a week ago.

The stories don't have to unfold over 12 - 24 months like they were in 1990. A talented writer should be able to tell a story in half that time and tell it in a way that their existing viewers like AND attract new ones. It can't be that difficult. But then again, maybe it is cuz no one in the industry now knows how to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if the black actors on the show are in that position, or at least she may not be. She hasn't worked on the show in months. She may also know that Nia Peeples and Kristoff St. John already blasted the show. If she made a peep, we probably would have had Adam turn Olivia into lunch meat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy