Jump to content

GL Christmas 2001


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Since we will not get to see GL Christmas this year here is a GL Christmas 2001: Edmund and cast singing "Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas" and also get a preview of David Andrew MacDonald [Edmund] singing B4 he goes into Mamma Mia!

Please register in order to view this content

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I liked Edmund more than the writing ever deserved, mostly due to DAM. He even managed to sell the short-lived "good" Edmund with Laura Wright's Cassie, a pairing which never should have worked.

The writing for the character has been bad for such a long time. Oddly enough I really enjoyed Edmund when he came back for that atrocious Bad Seed ripoff. I enjoyed seeing him put the screws to all the self-righteous criminals and losers who loved to lord over him, like Jeffrey, Beth, Josh, Cassie. The "good" people of Springfield. I wish they'd kept him around then instead of having him shipped off comatose because the Bad Acting Seed pushed him off a landing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Edmund and Cassie should not have worked, but it did.

The only problem with the "Bad Seed" storyline with Will was that they pussied out on it like they do everything, because they don't actually headwrite, just improv a few weeks at a time. That story was a gold mine. They should have had Cassie protect Will as he continued cutting a bloody swath through Springfield, assisted by Edmund after he recovered from that nasty fall. Cassie the preacher's wife should then have totally melted down and had an affair with Edmund behind Josh's back, leading to a Josh/Reva reunion. And you've got a crazy kid in the middle of it. It could've been a lot of fun, but as always, Ellen Wheeler's GL chose to resolve dynamite conflicts (Cassie as the vengeful, bitter wife of Rev. Josh, with a psycho child) in the most anemic way possible - a non-ending all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think your story would have worked. I know playing evil isn't easy for a soap child, but I didn't think the little boy they cast was remotely believable. They would have these big closeups of him frowning and pouting and then they would tell us how scary this was.

Having him as mentally disturbed, but not a big part of the story, and focusing on Cassie's torment and her feelings for Edmund would have been the better idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Edmund found his usefulness when they threw him back into the Spaulding atmosphere, by having him scheme with Alex. I think tons of potential was lost with Edmund's involvement with the Spauldings. He could have been paired up with India or Alex, and butted heads with Alan and Phillip.

Btw I liked Edmund's pairing with Beth as well. In early 2003, I would have enjoyed not a Frank/Beth/rick triangle, but one that included Edmund going up against either man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed, loved him with Joan Collins' Alex..they were hot despite the age thing. She flirted with him but had his number..I even liked him with Marj Alex, even though the sex chemstsry thing was gone. But I really thought Edmund should never had moved to Springfield, as soon as a character attempts to kill an infant, well, their use is gone.

Its weird but DAM played up the "good," Edmund so well, he seemed just like a nice midwestern guy. It was that time that I thought he would have made a great Tom Hughes on ATWT. Imagine a hot Tom Hughes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy