Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 20


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I thought that tptb justified the rape as them showing how similar EJ and Sami were. Sami raped Austin and EJ raped her. They were meant to be together!!!

I thought about that scene too. I could imagine the critics saying that Maria loves history and she uses it so well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Word, one of the few stories being done right and while I still think some things could ave been done better, I am liking it as well. And DG and CK are doing a wonderful job.

As for Deacon, he's just a sign of what's going on. Why did they even bring him that to this and they're forgetting that not everybody watches B&B. So who cares about their history? Deacon going thru all this trouble just to have one night with Amber is ridiculous and makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. All you have to do is check the episode counts to see who is really being shoved down our throats.

They need to have some explanation for Lane. It couldn't be that some viewers actually appreciate romance or have watched Lily since she was 14 and

are invested in her journey or see Cane as a romantic hero despite his newly contrived flaws. Now that Y&R has fallen off it's pedestal Lane is one of the few bright spots. Every couple has their niche. I can't stand Chilly but I understand the appeal of their humor and snark.

I guess we can blame the holier than thou nonfanbase for the debacle that is the return of the real Chancellor heirs. Priceless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously you haven't seen my posts regarding Shick/Phick. LOL! That's my most hated story and that one has been going on for 4 damn years, all on the front-burner.

I'm ready for some new characters given the front burner treatment, not Shick, Phick, or Lane. They've had too many stories thrown at them over the past two years. I need some new innovative storylines, that's all. I wasn't bashing their fans, all I said surely the fans of these couples want some resting time for them and to not see obstacles thrown at them every 5 minutes, some alone, happy time, that's all.

Again, I've complained about all of these characters and Lily and Cane do fit into this group as well.

There's a whole group over characters that haven't had storylines in like 3 years....

Where did I say they're always having it good? All I said all of their stories and the obstacles thrown their way serve the same purpose - to pimp their love stories and beat the audience over the head about how they're supposed to be together.

The writing is bad, no one is doubting that.

Also, from what I've observed. For as popular as they are, they're also hated as much.

It's a soap thing, but balance should also be a soap thing. I do not need the same characters being victimized repeatedly every 5 minutes, when a lot of other characters are completely ignored. Lane, as well as the other overexposed characters on this show have had too many obstacles thrown at them at under a year. It's boring, I need something new and I need other characters given attention to as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not counting this month, of course:

This was Lane's episode count up to last month:

13. Daniel Goddard (Cane Ashby) 56

14. Christel Khalil (Lily Ashby) 55

Jeanne Cooper lead with 80, but Lane is hardly neglected. The list of top 15 characters are the same ones that have been given frontburner story after frontbutner story, while so many are neglected. 55 and 56 episodes when the person in the lead has 80 episodes is a lot of airtime. Lane is as shoved down out throats as the inane quad and as Katherine has been.

We also need explanations for why the balance on this show is so off and why it's always the same 15 people on the frontburner, while other haven't had anything in like 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The amount of time Lane is given is just right. Not too much, not too little. Billy is far more over-exposed and shoved down out throats that Cane or Lily. Besides, though I believe Lane's popularity is over-rated by TPTB, they are far more popular than BAC, for example. Lane is pretty much the only thing on the show right now that's not completely horrible.

Of course Amber will be pregnant. Oh, the drama! In real life, she should be heading to a doctor the next morning to take the morning after pill. Of course, Amber's too dumb to do that because she is a wommin and we wommins are real dumb like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I'm not doubting that. As I said after Amber was RAPED by Deacon on Friday, I can now see why Lily's cancer storyline is the only glimmer of hope for some on this show, though it too has its flaws. It's the only story exploring some family dynamics and it's the only story with some human emotional basis that isn't completely vile or plagued by some one-note sleaze or psycho villain.

:lol::lol::lol:

This RAPE is inexcusable, and this writing regime should be ashamed of themselves for telling this crap, and I do believe they should all be fired for this crap and more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha--send me a pm once yours comes, although it will be a long time coming unfortunately.

The Deacon rape of Amber was revolting. Does MAB have any idea that her main audience is women and some of them are impressionable young ones????? Shame on MAB again!!!!! I will never get over that a woman no less is letting this through.

And, within days of introducing this new character, he's ruined by this hack team already? Way to go once again Y&R!!!

So let's see we have a pregnant woman being tortured, a baby killer, a burning fetus in a fireplace, a young innocent child intentionally being harmed and now a disgusting rape. How much farther can this show sink?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely. Here's a thought how about actually showing Lauren and Michael once in awhile. I'm not picky. I'll wait for a story. Let's start with actually seeing Lauren on screen and maybe seeing Michael for more than a few minutes once or twice a week to play super lawyer or straight man to others.

I don't mind this latest Lane story actually. I think the actors are doing well and the story is actually making me feel something. But it is not the Lane love that is moving me, it is the thought that a young woman of 22 has cancer and how it effects those around her and her own mortality. So many can relate to this story sadly. It has heart, but I think if you put any couple in this situation and it would have heart.

My main problem with Lane is that they were rebounding from failed marriages and supposedly fell deeply in love instantly about a year and a half ago, were together a few months, then were broken apart for 8 months, and now in just six months we have gone from Lily dating/sleeping with Billy and Cane feeling closer to Chloe to a superfast reconcilaiation, engagement, and marriage that culminated in a May wedding.

Now two months later they have broken up because of Cane's lies, Lily is fighting cancer and their love is being tested. What is the big rush? If they slowed down maybe I could feel this deep love instead of just being told it exists. And why can't this young woman actually be focusing on her career instead of worrying about pumping out a dozen kids for her husband who is pushing 40. They should have played the age/generation gap more with this couple instead of making them some "idealized" version of love.

But at least they are better that the QUAD who have all become jokes in this never ending game of relationship ping pong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I rest my case, I never said they were neglected. I even mentioned them being on the B list. I stated that you're acting like Lane is the one at the top and being shoved down your throats 24/27 when that is not true. Why aren't you calling out the other top 12 characters, you don't like them fine but there is a huge difference between 80 and 56. Not to mention, that is just an ep count, not the amt of minutes each character was on as well. If you're talking about airtime and episodes, then you ought to be an equal opportunity basher. But like I've said, Ive lurked here and it has nothing to do with that but a bashing of a particular fanbase who aren't well represented on this board. The fact is to tell a frontburner sl, you need to be on at least 3 days a week imo otherwise what's the point? So that's why Lane is onscreen.

Exactly, I'm not saying there aren't many in worse position then Lane. But to say they're overexposed is a stretch. Until recently, their storylines has them in a bubble with only the Winters. Billy for example is in every storyline known to man, he's in Lily's, BAC, Chloe/Chance and now I betcha the business sl. This is how soaps work, they have the A, B, and C cast and ocassionally they rotate. I have no problems with ptb spreading the wealth between contract players, some are recurring. But if you're going to pick on certain characters as being airtime hogs when they're in the middle of the pack and leave out the main culprits, well it makes you wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy