Jump to content

All: Why do most soaps suck monkeyba----?


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Wasn't Baby Grace's death "shock and awe"?

And it's funny that you mention cliches. Because, really, if you think about it, ANYTHING could be a cliche or something "that has been done before." Even something in primetime or film. But I feel like DAYS(and other soaps) should make some sort of effort to place a new spin on these cliches.

No one show has to be about social issues or even realism. But shouldn't the soap at least attempt to rise above some of its more shameful stereotypes?

I'm glad someone is enjoying DAYS. I used to race home from school in the afternoon to watch it in junior high. Sadly, I just don't care to enjoy it(or just about any soap) anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not at all. She got sick, and died, in a matter of like 3 episodes. If they ran her over or some crazy [!@#$%^&*] like that i would say yes it was shock and awe. Furthermore the fallout has been played so well. They have played every beat of the story through every character they could. If soaps want to kill babies, i would prefer they do it like this rather than running them over, blowing them up, or poising them. When Marlena's baby died of cribs death was that shock and awe? I dont think so.

I dont need a new spin put on naything. These soaps did the stories well for 3 decades, then it all went to hell as they tried to change it up. Go back, tell good character storylines. Thats all i want.

I dont know about needing to rise against its stereo types, i dont have an issues with soap opera stereotype to be honest, its what i want from a soap opera. I dont know where this soaps need to be Shakespeare attitude came from, but they never have been nor will they be. its an escape. its everydrama heightened. just dont play it out like a parody of a soap. soaps trying to be arrested devolpment or even SOAP & mary heartman, mary heartman is the issue.

i do enjoy days. i cant wait to watch it each day. sadly, this is the first time in about ten years, and i doubt it will last. but i hope it does. and i hope they hold onto and grow in ratings like they have been for this year so far. i am just happy i have a soap that i love and care about again. when i dont like a soap anymore, i quit. and me not watching soaps? well thats just wrong! i was raised by a grandma!! lol. even tho Grams doesnt watch them anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree wholeheartedly with this statement. I highly doubt GH's Left Handed Boy and Ice Princess storylines would qualify as being classic drama. Nor would I think Erica Kane jumping onto a helicopter in a wedding gown would qualify, either. Soaps were just as campy and over-the-top in the heralded 1980's as they are today.

The problem is people continue to toss around "plot driven" and "character driven" and yet, I doubt they actually know the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But R! R1 R! R! Remember when soaps were an ART FORM? A FORM OF ART to be STUDIED and APPRECIATED like a fine wiiine or a piece by Mozart! To be soaked up by intellectual minds!!

GMAFB. These shows were created to sell dishwashing liquid, people. Dishwashing liquid, soap, washing powder, and whatever else gets the house clean. The average viewer during "the glory days" was a housewife who raised kids, cooked meals, and cleaned house. NOT Harvard professors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently those writers thought those housewives were as smart as Harvard professors.

Victor of 1989 would not let Adam in his house without maximum security. And all those housewives know it.

Are we all to blame for watching reality TV, thus, the writers thinking we like shallow characters, and inconsequential explosions and casual sex without repercussions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victor of 1989 also had a newborn son named Nicholas who would have his 19th birthday five years later.

Those housewives could have been extremely intelligent, but come on. Let's all be honest now. Forreal, please. Nobody watches soaps to be intellectually stimulated. Not then, not now. People watch soaps for the same reason they press Mute when they hear the people next door arguing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
:huh: But who wants to be insulted with ret-cons, sh!tty dialogue, and atrocious production values? On any level, whether that is by reading a book or watching a TV show?

No one watches a soap for intellectual stimulation, you're absolutely right. But people DO watch to be entertained. The question is, what qualifies as entertainment to the viewer? Pretty clothes, great dialogue, interesting stories, melodrama, camp? All the above?

And shouldn't anything that is fictitious entertainment strive for a modicum of substance? Even if it fails at it on every level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ret-cons, sh!tty dialogue, and atrocious production values have been around on soaps since the 50s, so it's not as if the current crop of PTB are the architects of it all.

Entertainment is 100% subjective. Some people think watching murders is entertaining. Some people think animal sex is entertaining. Some people think car accidents are entertaining. Some of the sickest people in the world think that even The 700 Club is entertaining. Who is to say that what is considered entertainment to one person is more entertaining than what is considered entertainment to another?

And plus. People are still entertained by soaps. People on this board are still entertained by soaps. If we weren't entertained by them, we wouldn't watch them everyday or most days of the week, and even further, we wouldn't be posting about them online everyday either. They're still entertaining, just not the same way they were entertaining back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you.

This was cheap fare designed to sell Oxydol. [THAT is why they suck monkeyba---, and why they pretty much always have. Greatness was rare and brief...little spots of Camelot in an otherwise unending landscape of eyerolls. There is a REASON folks have made fun of soaps--RIGHT DOWN to their "soap opera" perjorative label--almost from the beginning]. If folks want something better, we have to leave daytime and commercial television (at least BROADcast). The economic basis for THESE dinosaurs that we love and discuss to evolve does not exist, IMO.

In the US, he next great soap will be (and already is) available once weekly for 13 weeks a year, preferably on pay cable. The cheap daytime progenitors...they will continue (as they always have) to suck monkeyba---. If you love soaps, you have to love them BECAUSE they suck monkeyba---, and because they sometimes eke out something better despite their general monkeyba--- nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy