Jump to content

All: Why do most soaps suck monkeyba----?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

What is going on in the soap world where everything is gimmicky, passion-less (forgive the muddled-pun), and plot-driven? Why are TPTB being so lazy? Why isn't anyone taking any risks with real heart? How are the remaining soaps ironically paying tribute to Passions in effect?

As with most soaps these days-- soaps I used to watch avidly growing up until college-- I watch for twenty minutes, shake my head in shame or roll my eyes in boredom and either shut the television off or surf the internet. This is what occurred a couple of weeks ago when I caught half of B&B, with Taylor and Ridge up in the cabin-- Ridge fed up with Brooke's shenanigans for the fiftieth time and falling into "Doc's" waiting arms for the twentieth. I remember when watching this triangle unfold and refold itself used to be fun. It was like a staple in B&B's core. I didn't mind that Ridge broke up with Brooke and got back together with her over and over again. It's quintessential B&B. But this storyline didn't have any heart.

And that's what's missing in a lot of what's on television today, I think.

I cannot be in the minority in today's audience. I'm not of the usual demo at all. But even people who go gaga whenever they see Lane make googly eyes at each other and think that the Rex/Gigi/Stacy triangle is the absolute best must feel like something is missing.

In fact, how is it in this minisode that is no longer than 5 minutes I see more heart than anything on today?

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

  • John tells Jill he has a Vasectomy but you can see that (even though it's not stated outright) Jill had been scheming to get herself pregnant just by Jess's acting.

  • And Michael breaks into Cricket's closet to seek his revenge. In seconds his motivation is revealed on screen and LeBlanc delivers his absolute hatred for her as well as how cunning his character is by seeking revenge in this manner.

I was too young to remember any of these storylines but these brief scenes reveal so much and the characters are what drive the story along, not the other way around.

Smart, scheming people with heart with motivation, with humanity. Why is everyone dumbed down and boring? :(:mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well I know this is an unpopular opinion here, but Y&R is close to that.. I really love it. Sure, it's not perfect, I don't like the supporting stories, but those main ones (the quad, Adam/Ashley, Chloe/Billy/Mac, Mary Jane...) I love and they entertain me so much.

The biggest problem I have with those B stories is that they don't take time to build up on them. Things just happen out of the blue. So the pacing and build up for those B stories really does suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But I truly hoped, and still do, you would have a certain amount of replies.

Had I started this thread, just like in that one about trashiness, I would be massacred and bombs would be thrown at me all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think since most soaps suck . . .

The activity on all the boards I peruse has dwindled significantly so maybe there just isn't anyone here to comment. You do create controversy Sylph. It's a talent. LOL.

Furthermore, the OP expressed my personal feelings quite eloquently, so my response would be redundant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soaps no longer have individual identities -- most tend to look alike and seem alike.

Soaps are now mostly about some bizarre idea of a swaggering, controlling, insecure, woman-hating alpha male who is a weak little baby underneath.

Soaps now actively fear or anything which does not revolve around the needs of a white heterosexual male, one who seems to belong in Conan the Barbarian times. Forget any attempt at handling progressive issues -- they don't even try for moderation anymore. Everything is set in some weird version of a world 50+ years ago which just happens to have cell phones and laptops.

Soaps have become all about shock value.

Soaps are no longer run by people who care.

Soaps are no longer run by people who have any love or respect for daytime. They are burned out, or they are still yearning to be in primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

if i ever felt my soap sucked that much, i would quit (and have).

I rather enjoy the soaps i watch currently. Days and Y&R, tho Y&R i always watched pretty much ebcause it was the master class of daytime, 20 steps above and beyond the rest. And its not anymore.

But Days gives me what i expect from a soap. An hour of entertainment. In the past week it has made me laugh, cry, and root for characters i love. Thats all i want. But that is rather new for that show, lol.

I think soaps suck so much now because above all else TPTB have screwed them for the past decade. Nobody cared enough to make a change. The same writers bounce from soap to soap. I honeslt think all soaps need is some fresh new blood all around from the top execs to the behind the scenes team. Writers, execs, producers, directors, etc.. whom care and can try some new things. Or at least give soap fans what they want and expect from a soap. Its odd, some of TPTB dont try at all, and others try to hard. And none of it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks rhinohide. :)

This topic perhaps seems to have been beaten down dozens of times for years now. Maybe people are tired of discussing it.

In my brief time on the board however, I haven't really seen any opinions as to why soaps in general have taken a nosedive in being cutting edge or at least not being character driven anymore?

I'm still marvelling at the fact that I knew everything about Michael in that minisode yet I don't know anything of substance, for instance, about Lily. How is it someone who gets so much screentime has utterly no personality? And I don't even mean personality in its usual usage. I mean no character flaws, no secrets, no likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses, motivations? And she's been alive as a character on Y&R for over ten years!! Even a bland character like Crickett had some character traits that differentiated her from everyone else!

The soap opera is unlike any medium around because these are people in our faces everyday of the workweek. I don't care how times have changed and the audience has become less patient and enjoy more gung-ho about explosions and mobs and murder. These are not films. These characters don't get summer hiatus and come back in the fall with a whole new slew of problems to tackle either. When they undergo a trauma, we have to see them from the beginning of it to the end of it to after it's over.

Soaps are notorious for being outlandish and illogical but we need to be able to see someone live through their pain, happiness, triumph, etc. If people are incapable of doing this at this point of the 21st century, then these shows need to change format and become 6-18 months long like telenovelas or weekly like primetime. Otherwise, why watch a show where there's murder, sex, intrigue, and yet the characters are utter non-entiies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's no one in charge that care about the genre anymore. ABC soaps are about plot devices and nothing more. CBS soaps are becoming like that, and Days has been like that(dunno about recently)

We need people who care about the genre to run it. Someone without personal agendas(Frons, Corday, etc....), to actually hire GOOD writers, and not the same old stale writers who've been driving soaps into the ground for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The people who run soaps don't think viewers want to care about characters. They think we only care about sex, about violence, about people screaming at each other. They assume viewers are idiots. They treat us with barely concealed contempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think TPTB have to be completely demoralized at this point too. I think half of them don't want to be doing this anymore, and the other half wants to be a part of it, but they're so beaten down by cancellation rumors, this insistence that they have to change, the formula no longer works, etc.

I think it's a general malaise on both sides of the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the thing is, i would think Days' year long so far sucsess would show them that the formula does work. Because love it or hate it, Days has done well ratings wise all year now, for the most part. And look at them. They have not reinvented the wheel at all. They are telling very soap stories. Baby swaps, love triangles, young lovers fighting obsticles, its full of secrets and lies, and they are all about the love in the afternoon. yes its cliche, yes its mellodrama, and no its not the most visually stunning grounfbreaking daytime drama...

i wish more soaps would just do this instead of trying to shock and awe us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy