Jump to content

May 25-29, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The network or show usually decides taht. For some reason NBC or Sony or Tomlin or Corday decided not to make Days count. They possibly felt that it would hurt their overall weekly rating and chose to count it as a special. Lately holiday ratings have been low and most of them choose to count it as a special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have mixed reactions to the OLTL ratings (it's the only soap I watch anymore or care about). I'm clinging by a thread to continue watching this show, and I honestly don't know why. Part of me is satisfied that the ratings reflect my own malaise and disconnect with the show while another part is saddened that the road to ruin is paved by more bricks labeled GIGI, REX, STACY, JOHN, MARTY, MESS (referring specifically to Jessica's alters, not Jessica), STARR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel the same way. I'm barely hanging on with the hope that things will turn around come Fall, but these pathetic ratings don't bother me. It's obvious many of us are becoming disenchanted with the show. But I'm still giving the show a chance to turn itself around. I know it won't be overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Basically I only watch the episode based on the recaps I read. The show is still on my DVR and I'm not ready to delete it completely because that means I've given up on the show. But like I posted in a different thread, I am thisclose from taking it off my DVR completely. OLTL is the only soap I watch so sadly I don't have a backup soap :( I don't have high hopes for the show this summer. From what I am reading

. I'm pretty much only watching for the supporting cast and vets <_< But I won't do this forever. The deadline for me is September 1. If the Fall previews are the same old stuff we've been fed all year, I'mma bounce. If RC wants me back as a viewer he will have to woo me back :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did not realize that the re-runs did not count to the overall ratings. Boy, does that suck hard for ABC. LOL! The only good thing for ABC is that GH's 18-49 women demo only decreased .1. Could have been worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is the share of the audience the program receives at the time. As the other ratings have dropped the shows shares have dropped too.

Basically what it means is of all the TV's turned on at the time Y&R aired, they only had 12% of them tuning in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The 18-49 ratings for the soaps this past week were pretty good but these soaps need to find a way to stop the bleeding of viewers every year.

Someone came up with this idea last year but maybe its time to for the networks specifically ABC to shuffle their lineup some.

GH Has Been Resurrected Thanks to Michael

GH has finally woken up as this was a great week for that show. Michael and now Kristina has rescued that show like Cole and Starr did on OLTL. I like seeing the growth of these two characters.

I wonder if they are still looking for a home for Guiding Light b/c I would really like to see how the soaps do on a mainstream cable network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes.

From the June 29, 1999 issue of Soap Opera Weekly:

"Several soaps gained ground the week of May 24. The same can't be said for the following week, which began with the Memorial Day holiday. Five shows dipped, but AW, Days, and OLTL increased. Days and OLTL increased substantially, thanks to the high drama both shows offered (Sami's execution and Jessica's tragedy, respectively); OLTL even managed to squeeze GH out of the top spot among women 18-49, the first time OLTL has held that rank in the past 10 years. As for the May sweeps period in the coveted women 18-49 demographic, GH ranked first, followed by Days, AMC, OLTL, Y&R, B&B and GL (tie), ATWT, PC, and Sunset."

Week of May 31-June 4, 1999

1. Y&R 6.4/23

2. DAYS 5.0/17

3. B&B 4.5/16

4. GH 4.3/15

5. ATWT 3.9/14

5. AMC 3.9/13

7. OLTL 3.8/13

8. GL 3.5/12

9. AW 2.5/9

10. PC 2.1/8

11. SB 1.8/7

Women 18-49

1. OLTL 3.3/22

2. DAYS 3.2/23

2. AMC 3.2/21

2. GH 3.2/21

5. Y&R 2.8/22

6. B&B 2.4/16

7. GL 2.2/16

8. ATWT 2.0/14

9. PC 1.5/11

9. AW 1.5/10

11. SB 1.1/9

Week of May 24-28, 1999

1. Y&R 6.4/24

2. B&B 4.7/17

2. DAYS 4.7/17

4. GH 4.4/15

5. AMC 4.0/14

6. ATWT 3.9/15

7. OLTL 3.6/14

7. GL 3.6/13

9. AW 2.4/9

10. PC 2.2/8

11. SB 1.8/7

Week of May 17-21, 1999

1. Y&R 6.4/25

2. B&B 4.6/17

2. DAYS 4.6/17

4. GH 4.4/16

5. ATWT 3.9/15

5. AMC 3.9/14

7. GL 3.6/14

8. OLTL 3.6/14

9. AW 2.3/9

10. PC 2.1/8

11. SB 1.6/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks MarkH

Here is what I can find for you on some of the Share Ratings for some of the shows back as early as the 1960 to 1961 season and then forward for some key years like 40, 30, and 20 years ago.

First number where they ranked for the season, 2nd number is the HH and the 3rd number is the Share - just doing the shows that still currently air.

1960 to 1961 (closest I can get to 1959 that has both HH & Share)

1. As The World Turns 10.4/44

2. The Guiding Light 9.9/40.4

1968 to 1969

1. As The World Turns 13.8/46

7. Days of Our Lives 9.3/31

9. The Guiding Light 8.9/31

10. General Hospital 8.8/30

13. One Life To Live 5.4/19

1978 to 1979

1. All My Children 9.0/33

2. General Hospital 8.7/28

3. Young & the Restless 8.6/34

4. As The World Turns 8.2/29

5. Guiding Light 8.1/28

6. One Life To Live 8.0/28

10. Days of Our Lives 6.8/24

Then the next rating I have saved that has both HH and Share is from the week of January 19 to January 23, 2004:

1. Y&R 4.6/15 (+.1)

2. DAYS 3.6/11 (+.5)

3. B&B 3.5/11 (+.1)

4. ATWT 3.2/10 (+.2)

5. GH 3.1/9 (-.1)

6. OLTL 2.8/9 (same)

6. AMC 2.8/9 (same)

8. GL 2.5/8 (same)

9. PSNS 2.2/7 (+.3)

As you can see Y&R was a 15 share then so they have only dropped 3% as far as share of the audience in 5 years which is not too bad.

The further back share ratings are not really fair to look at because the further back you go there was less competition for that time slot. So of course the share rating is definitely going to be lower now just due to that fact.

Also just to throw a little more information at you that might help some to understand things a little more. It is hard to even really compare HH ratings from year to year because Nielsen changes what the HH point means from year to year.

Just look at the 80's which is the last full decade I have the info for right now:

Year / Total Households For Each Ratings Point (1.0)

1980-1981 - 763,000 Households (i.e. 763,000 Households are represented in each rating point)

1981-1982 - 799,000

1982-1983 - 815,000

1983-1984 - 833,000

1984-1985 - 838,000

1985-1986 - 849,000

1986-1987 - 859,000

1987-1988 - 874,000

1988-1989 - 886,000

1989-1990 - 904,000

So each year they up it a little.

Note on the 1989 to 1990, Wikipedia reports that it represented 920,000 households. I copied this list out of a magazine years ago. So for now I am goign to stick with it.

I am not sure what the rating point equals right now. If I have seen it I forgot to write it down.

So even each year you have to tabulate a little into the rating to reflect the change. Even if a show stays the same in 2009 as it did for the same week in 2008 - it is probably acutally up some in HH's just due to the simple that a ratings point in 2009 will represent more houses than it did in 2008.

Thanks I had ratings from 1999 but didn't have the shares listed. Y&R really dropped a lot between 1999 and 2004, which I would say is typical as cable and satellite TV really grew during those years, and more stuff was offered as competion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the way to her own engagement party? I've read that the show had trouble getting the audience to sympathize with Rita, but...that seems bizarre. Maybe I can understand the issue with the censors, given that at the time, rape wasn't depicted the way it is now, and marital rape was even less acknowledged.  Wasn't Chris Brooks' rape one of the first honest stories on the subject?
    • Yes it was! My mom and I convinced my dad to get one. He was--how shall I put this?--on the thrifty side, but one day he came home with one as a surprise. To this day, I'm convinced it fell off a truck. (He knew people with "connections."

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) BUT, we had our VCR and we could watch our soaps. That thing lasted forever! It was built like a tank. Even when we got new ones with more features, we kept that one.
    • Please register in order to view this content

        Blasphemy!  (Haha, I get it.  But, you should try watching AMC! 80s-90s was so good.)
    • I thought about saying how I resented the fact that those two newbies were tripping up the Puppetmaster of all Puppetmasters, when the best others could do was a stalemate (or less...). But, well...*sigh*
    • I read years ago that both Zaslow and Lenore both complained that it came off as a seduction because of CBS censors, so Lenore asked if she could say, "you raped me" to leave no doubt with the audience, and that Zaslow insisted that Holly's rape played realistically 
    • Wow it’s official, Gatwa is out… https://www.avclub.com/ncuti-gatwa-addresses-doctor-who-finale-statement DW fandom on Reddit is in a furor over how things went down and apparent last minute scrapping of the original ending. Also…Billie Piper again really?
    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy