Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's hard to speculate with Cane cause he's such a goodie. Secret baby? Wouldn't make sense. Still married to someone from Aussie-land? Nope. People talk about writing villains into corners but you can also write heroes into corners as well.

I will speculate though, that if MAB can somehow fix Cane and make him fun to watch and fit on the show, she'll get the Immunity Idol for at least a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They seem to think he's some romantic hero, which he fails miserably at.

I wouldn't mind MAB picking up that dropped scene with Cane on the telephone having a questionable conversation with his uncle in Australia during the LML era. Maybe they should wait a while before Cane is exposed as some fraud or whatever, but I wouldn't mind it.

But again, we need strong writing to make it all work, MAB only seems to know to write for a certain group of characters she likes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While DG seems like a very likeable and nice person, I don't think he's a good actor. However, for some reason, I am not as bothered by Cane as many here. I can take or leave him. I've had moments where I've liked him (like last week when he called Billy out on having his own pity party), and then moments where I can't stand him. I think he could add something to the show, particularly since I do see potential in Cane vs. Billy. They have got to scale down his self-righteousness though, and make him a little less boring. He's not a very layered or nuanced character, they could really work on that (though I don't now if DG could handle that type of character). I also realize that Y&R has a certain "hunk" quota that they have to reach, as every soap does, and he fits the bill for the younger set, but they could stand to give him more layers and depth. Right now, Cane doesn't seem anything more than the typical "pretty but dumb" guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's painful that he's the Chancellor heir, given his age and the fact that he's such a poorly developed character. Though LML dropped it, I wonder if she planned to expose him as a fraud later on. That phone conversation with his uncle had to have had some significance for her, as horrible of a writer she was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes; he is not the romantic hero. I can see him as a Brad copy, a sleazy, kinda disgusting guy, who just uses women and goes after money. Who then dies miserably. I have been wanting them to revisit that scene with his uncle, too. But I see why they wouldn't do it now; the Kay/Jill thing has just been undone, some time has to pass by. But, yes, they should reveal him as a fraud, and make Jill come after him like a bat outta hell... maybe she can be falsely accused of his murder, I don't care.... Just as long as this is done with.

I really do think that the fact that he was pimped as a Chancellor and that his creation raped the show's history did him absolutely no favors. Good or bad actor, his character is an insult, a slap on the face to the show and that will never change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Cane is fine. My only real problem with the character is the weird age he's supposed to be. He looks enough like JW that I can buy him as her long lost son.

My other nitpick is that Nick already serves the role of pretty but sweet dumb hunk in a corporate job he's not qualified for. Now that Cane is back to his natural setting, a dive bar, maybe he can develop an identity that's distinct from Nick's. If they're going for the GC version of a Humphrey Bogart movie character -- a basically amoral but pleasant fellow, then the writers are on the right track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even though it wasn't directed at me (feel free to dismiss it with a quaint "Oh Rose"), I'll tell you what I like about Cane. I know that i may be banned from this thread for saying anything, anything nice about Cane (Dee will never talk to me again - "Dee: No. I won't.") But I'll take the risk and say this. I like that he's gallant and heroic. He's sort of noble but not arrogant. When he loves a woman, he truly loves her with his soul. He's forgiving and gracious as well. He's impossibly altruistic and down to earth. He's a classic romance novel stud. His loving nature and romantic passion is laughed at but it makes me coo. I am a Lane fan and I like him with Lily cause they fit.

My problem with Cane is that he's not the Chancellor heir I wanted nor could ever expect. Him being Austrailian is the biggest WTF-ever in casting and adds nothing to his character but an out-of-nowhere dialect that neither befits the son of Jill nor gives him any complexity. He's also passive and his storylines usually are him being used as a chew-toy for women. As for the actor, he can't possibly ever go toe-to-toe with any of the males in the business department, which is why he's back to being a bartender. The writing for him has made him a chump and confused the heck out of me. I get that he's nice, but WHO IS HE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy