Members Contessa Donatella Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 Who can explain to me how he messed up so badly with GL's "3 Carries"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Efulton Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 (edited) It is pretty simple Donna. He wanted to end the story and get rid of Jane Eliott. There could have been many reasons for his thinking. That one decision does not negate how successful he was at GL. Edited March 26 by Efulton 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members watson71 Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 Not to get off-topic, but Potter was very successful at GL. He kept the show competitive with GH ratings wise at the height of the Luke and Laura’s popularity. In addition, Potter’s GL beat GH as the Emmys twice during this time as best drama series. He cleaned up the mess that AW was in 1983 quickly, and if the ratings rose higher and AW won some Emmys, Potter would have probably stayed at AW longer than the end of 1984. To his credit, Potter retired and kept his word- he never worked in daytime again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Xanthe Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I don't really remember Taylor Halloway but I see according to the AWHP he was Kit and Rick's father and that he had an affair with his sister-in-law Miranda. Was there much of a storyline about this affair or was he just background for his children? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I don't remember a lot of him - I mainly remember him being involved in Kit's dramas. The whole family was dull. The only one who was interesting to me was Amy - her relationship with Jerry, her bitching sessions with Cecile about Pat, etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Xanthe Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I believe Cass and Felicia explicitly reminisced about Wallingford during the Carolyn shenanigans. I have to say that when I think back on the last few episodes I am eternally grateful that the big event wedding was Cass and Lila and not Amanda and Cameron. I happened to catch a scene the other day where Jordan Stark was trying to make Amanda the vessel for Amelie and there was a lot of dialogue about the struggle Amelie had to keep control of Amanda because even though Jordan dismissed the idea, Amelie could feel that Amanda really really loved Cameron and that strong love was blocking Amelie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I didn't really mind the gorilla at the end either. They could have made better choices (I still don't know why they didn't have Sam Groom back as Russ instead of a minister) but I thought it was OK. I don't think it besmirched AW. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members chrisml Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I'm less annoyed with the gorilla than I am with how they brought back Alice Barrett-Mitchell. They should have just retconned Frankie's death instead of bringing her on as Anne. Maybe that was the plan and they didn't have time, but it would fit in with the whole Lumina nonsense. I get why they thought the gorilla would be a throwback but I don't think 1999 viewers cared enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TEdgeofNight Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 It’s Samuel Ratcliffe. Please get the spelling correct. Samuel Ratcliffe. Brilliant writer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 You forgot the D. If you're going to make a correction, get it right yourself. And, he's a particular favorite of mine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 I'm not good about under-or over- rated exactly. Generally I'm only articulate enough to outline times I loved, times I liked, times I hated. Also things I have problems with. Like Mitch Blake. He fascinates me but at the same time I find him annoying. From his introduction through his time being 100% in league with Janice Frame at her very worst & then his amazing 180 degrees about face to helping Rachel get Mac into emergency medical attention all in a foreign land. And, then, I simply do not buy any of his romances - not with anyone! Typically I do not care for serial "X" storyline, not rapists, not killers, not stalkers. But then, an exception to that was that I really enjoyed the Sin Stalker story which I know you didn't care for. The combination of Joanne Going's Lisa character & her visions or ESP or whatever it was with The Sin Stalker also being her shrink was complicated, very soapy & I also admired David O'Brien as an actor that I had enjoyed on THE DOCTORS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted March 26 Members Share Posted March 26 AW YT beginning through 1979 Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Xanthe Posted March 27 Members Share Posted March 27 I'm torn because the Lumina nonsense also makes me see red and I think I would have been annoyed if that had been the crutch they used to bring Frankie back to life. Maybe if Lumina had been a hoax and Anne was a lookalike put up to the impersonation by Jordan Stark ... which could then either lead to finding the real Frankie still alive despite everything we had seen and heard, or the discovery that Anne was related to the Frame family. Although Sharlene was gone by then -- was there a Frame family to speak of? Josie I guess, representing the last vestiges of both Frame and Matthews. And of course she would be connected to Charlie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted March 27 Members Share Posted March 27 About the 2-day finale I have gone all the way around the world on it. I began explaining why the gorilla was an homage. And defending Goutman because of things he had supposedly wanted to do & was denied. Now I don't defend Goutman much. Beverlee to me was inspired. It wasn't his fault she could not. And, the device with the guests wishing the new couple well on the video recorder also inspired. But, I am aware of its reputation as one of the worst finales in all of daytime. Deserved or not, ... I guess I both hate it & love it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted March 27 Author Members Share Posted March 27 I don't understand why after 35 years of stories and characters to choose from, you would pay tribute to a long ago plotline about a gorilla. It's not as though it was up there as one of AW''s memorable moments and much loved/referenced by fans. As for Beverlee returning, they could have asked Beverly Penberthy,Richard Bekins or a host of others to return. Even Carmen Duncan to bring us up to date on Iris. So many possibilities not considered or rejected. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.