Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

This show is honestly, sublime. Literally sublime. Sophisticated, psychological, a little dark, but not too much, little funny, but not too much. Perfect. It's always the too funny aspect of some soaps that turn me off.

So... YES. Officially back into 1989... Managed to watch November-December 1988 to catch up with all the New-Iris drama. I may stop again sometime soon and go back to mid 1986 to watch all the way up to 1989. There are ton of new episodes on youtube.  

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have mixed feelings about Swajeski.  It seemed she did a pretty good job while she was following Harding Lemay's storyline projections.  But as soon as she used that up,  the stuff she created on her own was very mediocre.  And many of the new characters she created were created around a gimmick.  Derek Dane was "beauty and the beast", Frankie Frame was a psychic private eye, Lucas was a reformed gangster, etc, etc.  She often gave her characters a gimmick that made them less believable.  Some of the characters out-lived their gimmick and became believable despite Swajeski (Frankie for example), but most of them did not.  Sawjeski certainly wasn't AW's worst head writer, but she was far from the best.  At least she stayed with the show for a relatively long time, and slowed down the merry-go-round of head writers that preceded and followed her.  This is all just my opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's my introduction to the show, so I must be very lucky then. Do you recommend I go back to 1986 (the first available episodes that can be called semi-complete year in youtube... 1987 and 1988 are pretty complete in various playlists...) to catch up to 1989... or should I just continue with 1989...? I'm debating myself what to do. Is 1986-1988 a good period?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn’t recommend it.

But not because it was bad, but because there was so much turnaround from like May 86 to May 87. Literally half the cast was written out. It even confused me a little and I love AW lol 

1988 is a bit of a mixed bag too, because that year had 4 different head writers and the strike writers as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then it's really decided... I am so obsessed with 1989 that it would have been harder to go back... and your response helped me decide. I'm sticking with the sublime 1989... and maybe if some day I ran out of episodes... I'll go back. I'm watching 1 episode a day... 2 at most, since it's sooo good I don't want to watch everything in just couple of months. And Eddie Drueding (GOD BLESS HIM, he's AMAZING) is still uploading 1989... 

Thank you for the advice @AbcNbc247

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my opinion Donna Swajeski had 2 really good years and rebuilt & stabilized the show after Margaret DePriest gutted it. 
 

1989 was amazing partly because she followed a plan developed by Harding Lemay. Anna Stuart returned, the 25 anniversary episodes were great, Iris and Rachel were front and centre, Anne Heche was lighting up the screen and the Matthews were back albeit briefly.

1991 was must see.  Vicky & Ryan, the returns of Kathleen McKinnon and Carl Hutchins, Sharlene’s split personalities, the fallout of “Who Shot Jake?” and the introduction of Lorna Devon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
    • Very true...but TPTB all were desperate to get into prime time or films and couldn't, so they looked down on their own industry and tried to infuse themes that just didn't work in soaps. I would have thought after 9/11 the shows would have gone out of their way to provide that warmth and comfort that the audience wanted, and to bring old viewers back. Budget cuts? Just bring back kitchen sets, both ATWT and GL got rid of those besides one each..(the Snyders and the Bauers) You don't need super fancy sets if you have the writing. 
    • LMAO they didn't 

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • LY has a job on another show. She's going to be on the Legally Blonde prequel "Elle" 
    • From what I can put together, the 1980s had several actors with interrupted runs. Michael Zaslow: 1971-1980, 1989-1997 Maureen Garrett: 1976-1980, 1988-?, ?-end Christopher Bernau: 1977-1984, 1986-1988 Peter Simon: 1981-1984, 1986-1996, ?-end Maeve Kinkead: 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-end Robert Newman: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end Jordan Clarke: 1983-1987, 1989-1993, 1996, 1997-end By 1989, I believe the longest-tenured cast member without a departure was Jerry verDorn.
    • I know they were popular, but once they tamed Van's shrew, I thought Billy just brought Van down. Since they had just Nola and Billy sitting around in 97, an interesting thing would be if they had developed a friendship that turned into something else while Van was "dead". Maybe Billy lives at the Boardinghouse (to work on repaing his relationship with Bill) and works at Company instead of the stupid diner. Nola and Bridget give him a job there and Nola and Billy (who had originally been a bit antagonistic) slowly build up a relationship and then Van returns. A returned new lease on life Van would return to her "high hat ways" and take on the Spaulding's for control of the company with Billy helping her behind the scenes.  I know that Jordan was on sporadically because of his issues and them not know if they could trust him not to fall of the wagon, but they could have done it slow..and give Van and Nola a new reason to get in each others hair (I love a good Van/Nola tussle.)
    • Congratulations to Coco Gauff on her second win in one of the GS tournaments, the French Open.

      Please register in order to view this content

          Perhaps it wasn't the most well-played match in history, but that's something no one will remember in a few years time.
    • The thing with Martin (for me) is that he should have been Anita and Vernon's kid. I honestly think he would have been fine being an older or younger brother to Dani and Nicole. It also would have made his relationship and kids feel more realistic. A handsome salt and pepper late 40s/early 50s congressman who settled down and adopted kids to fit an image for politics. Not that he didn't want this lifestyle but it is what he needed to do to get ahead. Also, we don't often get older characters playing LGBT roles not just on daytime but across most media. It would have been a refreshing take. As an alternative, Sam and Ty could have been Martin's kids from an earlier marriage a la the NJ governor that was outed. We could have also seen parallels between Vernon and Anita thinking back to how they handled Martin coming out compared to the way they accepted Chelsea.  As for Martin being Nicole and Ted's kid, I do wish in this case he was not tied to a marriage and kids, so that he could date and sleep around like any other character on a soap.  Yeah, I didn't get it...but what I did get is that girl is a bit crazy like her mama.  Vanessa and Joey talking about the poker table...get these people off my screen. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Unpopular opinion, but I didn't think the show should have reunited Billy/Vanessa at all until the final stretch of the show. When watching the 1989 episodes when both Vanessa and Billy return after being off the show... I liked that Vanessa had moved on from him and that the show was hinting at her wanting to reunite with her first love Ross while looking down at Nadine for being the one Ross was dating.  And I loved the twist where Billy and Nadine teamed up to keep Vanessa/Ross apart.   This was an interesting concept that sadly the writers dropped with the show deciding to make Vanessa pine over Billy between 1990 and 1993 when they finally reunited.   To me, Vanessa pining over Billy seemed out of character. At least once Billy was carted off to prison in 1994... she and Billy divorced and stayed divorced until the final months when they finally found their way back together.  During the years when they were divorced, I liked that they had maintained a friendship and connection.. with viewers (like my late mom) wondering if they would ever decide to make it work again. I wish the show had tried that with Josh/Reva because by the time of the final episode when they rode off into the sunset, I didn't care because we'd been through the make up and break ups between them for over 10+ years by that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy