Jump to content

April 20-24, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

That last part is the key. You cannot put the same characters on day after day. That is what leads to the same conversations over and over or to the plotting problems.

Why not compare daytime to primetime, because to me that is what daytime has become. It seems like for the most part most of the time they are trying to write the shows as if they are hours of primetime. They try to pack so much into an episode it seems they forget they have a whole week to tell that story.

The Josh story for instance seemed like 3 primetime episodes right in a row. If they had slowed it down the story would have worked much better.

Sure speed up the pace but instead of trying to write 5 primetime episodes a week - why not write one and spread it out over the week.

But again you can't do it by showing the same people every single day.

you mentioned Bill Bell slow. Back in the 70's perse with Bill and Laura - the story that he took the longest to tell - you didn't have that story or it's principles featured every single day. you might have them about 3 times a week. He would have 3 or 4 a stories going and each would get 2 to 3 days a week and then he would have a bunch of minor stories going and you got them as fill-in scattered throughout.

Even with tighter budgets today, the shows have enough characters that they can still do this. They just keep choosing to write for the same ones over and over and over and over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, exactly! And what I noticed about that, Y&R in particular, they will show like 2 or 3 clips for the following episode, making you think X,Y and Z won't be on, but they are and I think that's a problem because people will not tune in thinking "okay Jill isn't on tomorrow so I'm not watching," but she is, she just wasn't in the preview.

Very important key here, Steve. The same could apply to Lincoln and Kelly Tyler on AMC. They married and left. Had they remained, I'm sure they would have broken up and gotten back together many times. However, I wish they would have had a son to keep the Tyler name alive today. Even a daughter for that matter.

As for Luke and Laura, when Guza broke them up after 18 years (or maybe that was the writer after he left), to me, it made sense, because Luke and Laura got boring and if they were going to be happily married, what storyline could they have? They were a couple based on action and adventure stoylines, it was the GH of the past. They had pain and suffering because of the Cassadine's. Nikolas and Lucky hated eachother. Luke and the Cassadine's hated eachother. Laura was in the middle. There was suffering. Granted, the storyline could have been a lot better. Also, I wish they could have given both Luke and Laura a story where they both move on and fall in love with other characters, giving the theme that nothing lasts forever, but time heals all wounds and you can love again. For instance, I enjoy the scenes with Tracy and Lulu and I wish there was more to the Step Mother/Step Daughter dynamic there. Tracy was a spoiled little brat. Laura is ill and Tracy should really mentor Lulu and then Lulu comes into accepting Tracy as another mother figure. It would be a nice touch to have that. Tracy could become the mother she never was to Ned and Dillion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, I think it is very important that storyline's move in a slow pace. For example, I love when I'm watching Y&R on a Tuesday, because it's really still Friday in Genoa City. Because that mean's so much is going on and you are able to keep track of it all.

I remember Agnes Nixon once said they write their stories out for an extended period of time, and have them climax during the sweeps period. They build everything up for the sweeps months. That makes total sense. Today it's like GH has a big shindig planned for November, but the whole back story takes place in October. It's all crammed in. What's the point in turing after May then? There are 3 or 4 sweeps periods? So should we only watch for those amounts of months and a little beforehand to get the back story? That isn't good story telling. When you have a story pan out, we get to see the character's develop. What makes them tick, what makes them smile, etc. Those are important. Watching your character's just sit back and talk about nothing is important. It's important because it's relatable. The whole point of television is to entertain in a way that makes us forget about our problems and the next day at work, we have those "water cooler" conversations. "Did you see what Erica did on AMC yesterday? OMG CSI was nuts last night. I can't believe that happened, did you watch it?"

I remember back in college taking one last class for my major and I recall a study that showed out of all the viewing options we have today, the majority of viewers would prefer to watch a program where they have very little interaction with it. They can sit back and get into it. You can do that easily with Y&R. I say that not because I love it and watch it and because it's number 1, but because I can quit on Monday and return to it in June and I won't be lost. Those same character's will be there doing the same things they always do. They are familiar. Storylines may change, but it will be easy to put it together. Once you sit back and watch, things fall into place. I put on GH and it's like "wait? Claudia is pregnant? Did she have sex with Sonny? When did this happen? Wait, how many kids does he have now? Wasn't Kate just shot?" It's too fast. That's another reason why I stopped watching ATWT. I recall a time where I didn't watch for 6 months and I put it on one day and I was able to pick it up right from where I left off, and this was when FMB was still the EP.

When I watch Y&R at my mother's house when I'm visiting she knows who is who when she sees it, and she doesn't even like it or watch it. Only a glance when I have it on. She's watched AMC since 1977. She watched OLTL from 1977 as well but stopped pre Linda Gottlieb. She began watching OLTL again in the early 2000s, yet she has to ask my sister (who's been watching the ABC soaps since the 90s) who is who because a lot of the character's that were on pre-1990 aren't around today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have noticed many of the same things you do. My daughter visits a lot esp. while I am watching Y&R. She never watches the show preferring AMC, but each time she comes over she talks about Y&R as if she knows what is going on. She talks about how she wished that AMC was a little slower because she feels lost if she misses a few days.

You don't do that with Y&R. And the characters are a big thing too. People watch soaps to follow characters they love. Way too many of the characters that fans love and are attached too have been gone. Every soap needs new blood but they have to be anchored by the old and familiar. If people tune in and can't relate they won't stay.

I miss those water cooler conversations about soaps the most. Soaps just don't inspire them anymore or at least not as much as they used too. I know my boyfriend who is a fireman says that the talk at the fire department is in a big way about Rescue Me which didn't surprise me. He said on the day after the show is on everyone that comes in the door says did you guys see what Tommy or someone on the show did last night or it is about somethign they said. They also talk about Nip/Tuck and other FX shows like that too. But Rescue Me they really do. What is strange is that more times than he can count the stuff that people remember about the show are not the major plot points of the show but it will be stuff from minor conversations or stuff - the character stuff you could say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 3.9/5,583,000 (+666,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.6/3,606,000 (+329,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Monday: 2.1/2,829,000 (+138,000)

4.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.1/2,778,000 (+479,000)

5.(4) GH: Monday: 1.8/2,453,000 (-32,000)

6.(5) AMC: Monday: 2.0/2,442,000 (+128,000)

7.(7) OLTL: Monday: 1.8/2,325,000 (+74,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 1.5/1,917,000 (-208,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.9/5,436,000 (-147,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.6/3,426,000 (-180,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.3/3,105,000 (+276,000)

4.(4) ATWT: Tuesday: 1.9/2,529,000 (-249,000)

5.(6) AMC: Tuesday: 1.9/2,478,000 (+36,000)

6.(5) GH: Tuesday: 1.7/2,213,000 (-240,000)

7.(7) OLTL: Tuesday: 1.7/2,205,000 (-120,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 1.6/2,092,000 (+175,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.6/5,155,000 (-281,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.5/3,457,000 (+31,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.2/2,921,000 (-184,000)

4.(6) GH: Wednesday: 1.9/2,353,000 (+140,000)

5.(7) OLTL: Wednesday: 1.8/2,352,000 (+147,000)

6.(5) AMC: Wednesday: 1.7/2,318,000 (-160,000)

7.(4) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.8/2,298,000 (-231,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.5/1,927,000 (-165,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.4/4,780,000 (-375,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.6/3,444,000 (-13,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Thursday: 2.2/2,848,000 (-73,000)

4.(4) GH: Thursday: 1.9/2,401,000 (+48,000)

5.(7) ATWT: Thursday: 1.8/2,340,000 (+42,000)

6.(6) AMC: Thursday: 1.9/2,332,000 (+14,000)

7.(5) OLTL: Thursday: 1.8/2,302,000 (-50,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.5/1,968,000 (+41,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.3/4,589,000 (-191,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.6/3,508,000 (+64,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Friday: 2.0/2,797,000 (-51,000)

4.(6) AMC: Friday: 1.9/2,545,000 (+213,000)

5.(5) ATWT: Friday: 1.9/2,497,000 (+157,000)

6.(4) GH: Friday: 1.8/2,381,000 (-20,000)

7.(7) OLTL: Friday: 1.7/2,257,000 (-45,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 1.5/1,941,000 (-27,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow AMC went up in the Men Demo, the 18-34 Demo and Girls 12-17 and gained 10,000 in the 18-49 but they lost in total viewers.

They must have big losses in the 50 and older crowd which Frons won't really care because he has always been about the youth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If this rating trend continues it won't be AMC that is the first ABC show to go. OLTL and GH are bleeding viewers. AMC has lost a lot but in comparison to last year they are down less than 50,000 while GH and OLTL are down more than 300,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not just that but Tennessee has so many times over the last 2 weeks in particular where we have had afternoons where the soaps didn't come on any channels at all due to bad weather.

Friday afternoon, I ended up giving up and not sure if they ever came back on or not. I checked back at about 2:30 and I know GH was not on. I never did check to see if GL came back on or not.

I talk to a friend in Alabama and they said that it was the same way there. He said in their area that the soaps had missed about 3 days in the last 2 weeks just due to weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy