Jump to content

AMC: Is Dixie really dead?

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please tell me this is April 1'st joke.

Whatever you do, don't discuss pancakes around an All My Children fan. The killing of Dixie Martin still doesn't sit well with AMC fans and it's been two years since the character was killed off. Now, a new storyline twist is bringing Dixie's death back to the foreground. The question is simple: Why?

It's been two years since that fateful day when a stack of pancakes felled one of All My Children's best loved heroines. Though most fans really don't want to dwell on the day that Dixie died, some may have to brace themselves. All My Children is poised to have fans revisit that infamous day.

For reasons that remain unknown, All My Children's head writer, Charles Pratt, Jr., is bringing Alexander Cambias, Sr. back into the fold. The former Satin Slayer will reappear in the weeks ahead to promote a book he's written about the murders of several Pine Valley residents. In an odd twist, though, Daddy Cambias will deny having any part in the death of Dixie Martin. According to the elder Alex, Dixie was killed by a copycat killer.

Astute viewers will remember that Dixie was killed by accident. The poisoned pancakes that killed her were actually intended for Babe Carey. For several months now, fans on soapcentral.com's message boards have been wondering if David is hiding Dixie somewhere. Certainly there is a connection. David was infatuated with Dixie and he was Babe's father.

So what does this all mean? Why dredge up such an extremely unhappy moment in recent AMC history?

Word of a major casting announcement prompted many AMC fans to think that Cady McClain was returning to reprise her role as Dixie. Those hopes were dashed when McClain inked a deal to return to CBS's As the World Turns. The casting announcement, as it turned out, referred to the recasting of Liza Colby.

It seems unlikely that ABC would greenlight a Dixie recast, but nothing is ever really out of the realm of possibility any more. Perhaps the groundwork is being laid for an eventual return of Dixie.

Is All My Children getting ready to launch another serial killer storyline? Why mention that there was a copycat killer out there if there's no plan of ever trying to find that killer?

All of the new twists lend themselves to the big question: Is Dixie Martin really dead? Viewers saw a ghostly Dixie on more than one occasion since Dixie was killed off. SO she has to be dead, right? It's still way too soon to tell, but as soap fans know… anything is possible.

Source: http://www.soapcentral.com/amc/news/2009/0330-dixie.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carolyn Hinsey thinks Zach has her squirrelled away somewhere, "recovering". Couldn't that fit in too?

Oh, somehow in all this nonsense I've feeling a very sick genre. We just can't keep doing these fanciful things...every one brings more eyerolls, and more self-respecting people who can't keep watching sh*t like this. Even if Cady's dismissal was a terrible and vindictive mistake, it still needs to be left alone, IMO.

How about a 12-month, genre-wide moratorium on ghosts, doppelgangers, switched DNA/stolen babies, and amnesia? Let's see what is creatively left after that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Dixie is alive. I just think they'll find out someone else killed her, and Tad will believe it was Adam. Or something equally as lame.

Pratt is totally Melrosing AMC, and not the good Melrose years either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Community Posts

    • Just started reading Grillo-Marxuach’s statement and already am taken aback by the use of portmanteau of Lindelof and Cause’s names. Were they really called “Dalton”? Hopefully my local library will get the book in some form (I made a request for an audiobook and an ebook) because this sounds like an interesting read.
    • There's a lot of narrative rewriting about Lost because it ticks many of the boxes of what was supposed to be - in terms of diversity, and expansion of network television mindsets - but at the time, the show mostly got buzz in that first season. The second and third seasons got a ton of negative response (especially the third) and even when things stabilized after that, there was a great deal of mockery of the navel-gazing "mystery box" world to help hide that there were no clear plans in place.  Even at the time I remember fans pointing out what hacks Lindelof and Cuse were. That's true for fans and producers in general, but that label has stuck, deservedly so. I always got bad vibes off the show, as well as Desperate Housewives, and consider both to be classic examples of narrative and media hype mattering more than the product itself. I'm sorry to hear just how ugly the atmosphere was backstage at Lost, but I can't say I'm surprised. It's one of those shows where the vileness bled onto the screen, especially in the deaths of those (mostly non-white) who were deemed unworthy.
    • Wow, such an invaluable information, I hope I get this for OLTL one day, but love reading in such detail the history of GH. Thank you!
    • Javier Grillo-Marxuach's full statement is a lot. Oh, BTW: @marceline will be pleased and/or enraged to know the book apparently extensively covers Sleepy Hollow.  
    • I binge watched seasons 1 and 2 after the series ended. I've never been able to watch any farther than that. The main thing I remember about this show is Dominic Monaghan stating non-clamantly in an interview that Matthew Fox was a wife beater. Wild times!
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy