Jump to content

AMC: Thursday, March 26, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Obviously the only reason Jesse took in Little A illegally was so David can blackmail him and Angie at some point in the future. This is such a ridiculous plot point! If Jesse & Angie really considered David such a smart foe, they would have stuck by the book to become his foster parents or just stayed out of this because they should know David will find out and hold it against them.

I enjoyed Angie's loathing of Randi in the past, too. It was much more interesting than watching her act as a surrogate mom to the former hooker who just married her son.

Does Kendall know about Myrtle's death? I don't remember anyone ever telling her.

I loved Erica's scenes with the judge and then letting David know that she foiled his plans. Both Monday's and today's episodes featured the fun, bitchy Erica. I hope we get to see more of her and less of the Erica who keeps pimping Zendall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, yes, yes.

I know the plot point of Angie and Jesse ending up foster parents to Lil' A is not realistic but I really want to see the Hubbards involved in a primary story like The Great Baby Con of '09. So I am overlooking the WTFs of it (for now) and am happy they're onscreen more here and with their own family. I do wish it were at least legal. Steve you're probably right that it's going to be blackmail bait for David later on.

Was Zach proposing to throw down with his nemesis in the supposed struggle for the ages right there in the house with Emma there? Klassy.

Zyan=Tavid They really desire/love each other best, not their women (I mean after themselves, naturally)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, horribly true! Though to be fair to Pratt, this template was in place long before Chuck came to AMC.

On a brighter note, I could watch Little A in scenes all day. He and the little girl who plays Miranda. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy