Jump to content

B&B: Week of March 9th-13th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Another nitpicky thing...these whole "Stephanie catches Brooke/Donna in their underwear, naked or compromising positions" is getting really old.

I mean, I kind of feel as though they script these moments to call attention to the Susan Flannery Is a Lesbian stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Thanks. So this feud between he and Rick is completely new and has no basis in anything written before? I was wondering if Rocco had something with Felicia bc the 2 seemed to have some chemistry here. Was he a contract character or a minor one used and dropped within a few months?

LOL...you read my mind bc I just finished watching this week's worth of shows and was going to post. Jeez, how many times can we see Stephanie walk in on Brooke in her underwear and Donna naked after getting a massage/bath? You are right in that it has gotten old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Rocco was a contract player in his first two-three years there. He was there for a little bit.

I don't think Rocco had anything with Felicia, but I do recall another poster here saying that he was Ridge's right hand man. I think Rocco was more involved in the Donna/Katie story. I think that was Lesli Kay's way of jazzing up her "Hi, bye, see ya later" scenes.

Thank you. I could see if this was something cute and funny that happened on rare occasions. But it seems like at least once a week these weird scenarios happen. I don't think I'm jumping the gun by assuming it's some kind of inside joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I said: Rocco & Fefe never met before.

Rocco wasn't exactly Ridge's right hand man; he worked in shipping with Thorne but served as a sounding board for Ridge which he just admired. Rocco never had much story because that Katie/Rocco/Donna thingie never really took off. Rocco was true supporting character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very kind of you to say this but fact is I'm not emotionally missing B&B anymore. Right now I'm totally done with it for the first time ever. :( My last show was New Year's Eve and this past week I only caught bits and pieces to see Rocco.

I'm still archiving B&B - and hence could watch it - but I don't feel the urge to do so, unfortunately. And last week seemed not even half-bad possibly, at least the show seemed to feauture more than the 4 most obnoxious characters/actors, but still I don't feel any drive to start watching again. I'm beyond happy with Y&R and for my campy fashion dosage I'm currently watching UGLY BETTY where I'm in the cycle of season 2 and will soon start season 3. Maybe after this, I will give B&B another try - Joanna Johnson be damned. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Finally! Someone else who noticed how hideous, Thomas' sweater is. He seems to wear it in every damn scene, day in, day out. No guy Thomas' age would be seen dead, wearing something like that. How contrived. :rolleyes:

Don't care that Thomas is the fire bug.

Don't care about Stephanie walking in on a half naked Brooke/Donna - that gag is positively prehistoric. Get over it!

Rocco's intro was terrible. I never had the chance to see his first stint, so for me, he's basically a new character, yet they introduce him, like everyone will know who he is.

Is anyone else getting tired of Felicia's fleeting appearances? I love the character, but it's criminal how wasted she is. Jake gets more air time than her, and he's a bit player.

I am still enjoying the show - seriously! It's holding my interest, even though the above says otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy