Jump to content

How much of a garbage daytime soaps really are?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This post is garbage! "...they represent a distorted, prettified reality full of false dreams, terrible, clichéd stories written all over again..." :blink: "...I wonder genuinely and I hope someone will illuminate me..." SERIOUSLY, who talks like this!!?!? Is this a parody? (Or I guess using your dignified vocabulary, we'd have to say 'satire!')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You do realize that most people don't know who Verlaine and Rimbaud are, correct? That doesn't make them uncultured or unintelligent. It means that they don't know who Verlaine and Rimbaud are. They don't like poetry, maybe. Maybe they don't like French poetry. Maybe they don't like 19th century French poetry.

Honestly, this makes me laugh. You don't like a lot of stuff in literature and music, but you "appreciate" them nonetheless. Might this be translated as..."Well, I don't get why this is so great, but all of the rich 'intelligent' people say that it's great, so I'll say that it's great." If we were slaves, you'd probably be the one grandstanding to the rest of us that massa knows best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I keep getting stuck on the title of this thread. Is this even grammatically correct?

"Garbage," I take as a plural, but the "a" singularizes it. A garbage... dump? A heap of garbage?

"Are daytime soaps really garbage, and if so, how much?"

I think that says it better, but maybe I'm reading with my uncultured glasses and misinterpreted. All My Shadows, can you enlighten me?

I thought Verlaine/Rimbaud was a brand of pasta sauce. Whoops!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This thread is pure hilarity and bitchery, mixed into a unique concoction. I love it! :lol:

I'm not even sure I understand what exactly Sylph is getting at.

I do agree with the "subjective" ideology that is preached in this thread.

But I also think there are a few people who hate soaps and want soaps to be something else than what they are. Hardling Lemay admitted to this in the past. He said he was ashamed of writing soap operas for a long time, and tried his hardest to elevate what he saw as cliche soap writing to something that was more theatrical, and to his credit, he did start off as a playwright. I can't say he was wrong though, after all, his 70's stint at AW is considered a high peak in terms of soap writing. This belief that soaps should be more than what they traditionally were arguably started with Lemay and got much more out of hand with others, like Monty and even Reilly. To their credit, Lemay, Monty, and Reilly brought many people to the soap genre that probably never would've come otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: :lol: :lol:

As somebody who's traded numerous barbs with the original poster over the years, I really think Vee said it best with her "dance-puppets-dance-routine" line. But I think his question does provoke some good discussion that I've enjoyed reading, so I'm glad for that... even if his motivations and responses were meant to push people's buttons.

But it is a message board, and I (and I'm only speaking for myself) do enjoy the debate of the question. The talking-down-to, not so much. But you take the good, take the bad. (Take 'em both and there you have... oh, wait. That's a TV theme song. Not very enlightened of me at all. :P )

Amen, sister! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You should have posted "I told u I wuz hardcore"

Be sure to cycle over to the next round of mood adjusters for the evening, Sylph, we wouldn't want you to miss any more beats than you already have. How society has gone so long being denied the spectacle of you crawling up your own ass with a "sassy strut" seven days a week I just don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love the posters at this board. Been laughing my ass off all day without the aid of mood-altering prescription meds. We need a "Best Day Ever" segment on The SON Insider to highlight the good times, like this one.

Back to my rocks and figuring out what brand of pasta sauce to buy now that I've learned the much hyped Verlaine/Rimbaud sauce doesn't exist. D'oh! <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was actually laughing at how much distortion this thread suffered. How it all plummeted like a train off a bridge (yeah, there goes my favourite phrase). It's just hilarious, tragic, unbelievable, a whole lot of things. And all because people thought I was ridiculing bellcurve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
    • Yup.  You can hate John all you want, but like seriously he was the cornerstone of the show for years.  So he should get a long ass funeral and burial and all the things because Drake and John deserve that.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      look who’s at a party I’m at
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy