Jump to content

December 29, 2008 - January 2, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm not saying they haven't gone up in the last three months. They have. But until that second number is in the positives, there's no reason to cheer that loudly. They're gaining back lost viewers, but there's a bigger picture to look at here - and that's how the show looks from year to year. When they start gaining viewers from a year ago, then there's reason to shout from the rooftops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Toups can probably answer this because right now I cannot find my numbers right now.

But didn't Nielsen change the actual numbers to computer the HH's this year. They do that periodically and I was thinking this was the year they did it. In other words there are more households included per point this year than last.

They did it in 2008 or in 2007 and I cannot find my notes right now.

If it was in 2008, then the comparison of the HH rating for 2008 and 2007 is not going to be completely accurate because even though they may be lower now they could be equal to 2007 in actual households.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I found this at another board re: how TPTB

look at the ratings e.g.

General Hospital:

Its a bi-monthly look at the last week of the month for the past year.

Week of October 20-24 they had 2.1/1.3/.9

Week of August 25-29 they had 2.1/1.3/.9

Week of June 23-27 they had 2.1/1.5/1.2

Week of April 27 - May 2 they had 2.2/1.5/l.0

Week of February 25-29 they had 2.3/1.6/1.1

If you charted this then there's been virtually NO loss in Household viewers, slow, steady deteoriation in the 18-49 group and a major loss of 18-34's beginning after June.

Does anybody know about this?

Is this true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the season to date totals which the advertisers look at a great deal, Days is exactly where it was last year which is a good thing.

Using the same exact season to date totals from the year before Days was at 2.1 in Total HH's and 1.4 in 18-49 which means they are not down overall. They are holding on. Considering how bad they got at some points this last year to be equal with last years season to date totals is a good thing too.

They are the only show to do that. The rest are down from this point in the season totals from last last years.

Here is last seaon to date for this same week:

For the SEASON September 24, 2007 through January 6, 2008

HH

1. Y&R 4.1

2. B&B 2.9

3. GH 2.4

4. ATWT 2.3

5. OLTL 2.2

6. AMC 2.1

6. DAYS 2.1

8. GL 1.9

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.9

2. GH 1.6

3. OLTL 1.4

3. B&B 1.4

3. DAYS 1.4

6. ATWT 1.3

7. AMC 1.2

8. GL 1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As Mark H and I have both been pointing out though in a declining market any growth is something to shout about. Even being stagnant which when you look at the season to date totals Days is right now is a good thing. And the networks and advertisers are going to look at that as a positive. As Mark H said and I tried to point out in a different way it means that you have temporarily stopped the bleeding by either meeting the loss of viewers with an influx of new viewers to even things out.

Will it be enough to save any of the shows or the genre?

Who knows at this point. But all I know is that back in the summer and up to about September the ratings threads were depressing. And I personally wouldn't have given soaps very long based on that but the increases and the stagnant ratings of some is encouraging to me.

And the mere fact that I can now watch All My Children and One Life To Live again and see shows that are more balanced than they ever were before. And to not have to watch everything be about John McBain or Kendall or Greenlee or Ryan and actually see other stories - I feel better about daytime soaps than I have in a long long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It looks like more people than I realized got Jan 2 off. LOL.

I'm really loving Y & R right now and I hope it continues to go up. This could be just another yo-yo week. I hope not.

Like soapsuds, I laugh at the Days and OLTL ratings and enjoy them for the same reason. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I admit that I am surprised about Days and have to wonder if it is because students are home for the holidays. You know, I've always like rouge characters and think Brady Black has a lot of potential this time around. I am hopeful about the AMC ratings. It hasn't been great, but it also hasn't been awful. Man, I do hate those camera angles though.

It was an interesting ratings week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brimike, what am I missing here? Are you just looking at the 18-39 or 18-49 numbers? Because in total HH, DOOL is our sole GROWTH soap over the past 12 months.

Moreover, one year is long enough to call it a trend. The Days growth is almost equivalent to the average decline of all the other soaps! Mathematically, that means that for every viewer the average soap lost, Days gained one!!!!!

Given the time frame, what makes this even more remarkable, is that this can mostly be put at the feet of Higley and any of her supporting scabs!

In this market, Days, AMC and OLTL are case studies. And what they tell us, I fear, may not be music to the ears of the some of the long-term fans of old-school soaps on this board. Newbies, ditching vets, sensationalistic stories...one could argue that they are WORKING for Days, AMC and OLTL. (OLTL is a strange hybrid, so it is kind of interesting that it is the only soap that, in the past 12 months, neither lost nor gained...it is stuck in the middle).

If I were a non-thinking network exec, I'd say; "Do what AMC and Days are doing!". Y&R would therefore rehire LML :-).

I make NO assumptions that the genre is rebounding, or that the long-term trends will shift from their current decline trajectories. But I think 12-month trajectories are themselves worthy of study...."short-term reprieves", as it were. Days, AMC, and OLTL are "bucking the trend" for the time being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, that's the question about total viewers. Does ONLY 18-49 matter? Or does 18-49 matter MOST?

That is an important distinction. Because, right now, the smart path (for an advertiser) would be to value any eyeball, but maybe not value them all equally.

If ratings growth in this market becomes irrelevant, simply because it is the "wrong" kind of growth for Madison Avenue...well...then I do agree all is lost :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL's numbers are not bad, they are steady and I cannot wait for February sweeps. Ron always like to pull out all the stops for sweeps. November was very successful, Frons was most happy with OLTL during last sweeps. Also OLTL is MUCH CHEAPER TO PRODUCE THEN GH OR AMC.GH is really needing Vanessa more then ever.If I were Frons I would put Lisa DeCazotte at AMC and move Julie Carruthers back to GH. JFP has gotta go IMO, they need some type of boost over there. Y&R is going back up but we have to give Paul Rauch the big credit. OMG the show is like night and day. Everyone keeps gushing Maria Arena Bell but Paul is a huge reason why the show is so good right now. Pre-Paul it did not look anywhere near as good as it does now. The show looks very expensive and very classic and old school. It is very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was always taught... and mind you, I'm not saying this hasn't changed, because it's been awhile... but I was always taught that at the end of the day, total viewers is an irrelevant number. -They always are targeting a specific audience, and therefore can charge more for a certain kind of advertising. Because of the 18-49 and 18-34 demos, they make more money from a 30-second ad spot for. say, tampons than they do for men's razors.

Now, should it suddenly shift, and the number of men watching increased, then they could gauge that in a different way. But I'd be hard pressed to find a show that changed from a primarily female audience to primarily male audience like that.

But total eyeballs doesn't mean anything, especially in this economy. You'd think it would be the reverse, but as I understand it, the few thousand men watching soaps aren't enough to warrant the ad spot. I think you'd want to get as many viewers as possible, but Madison Avenue is a firm believer in the demographic. They don't want to appeal to everybody, because it's nearly impossible. They'd rather focus on who their largest demographic is. The last three soaps that got canceled were canceled because they didn't match the 18-49 demographic the network wanted them to. NOT the total viewers. Total viewers meant nothing, it was all about that 18-49 female demographic. When they didn't make the "magic number" in 18-49, they were gone.

Of course, maybe they'll look at things differently now. Who knows... I know no more than you do, believe me. I would love it if they changed the rule back to what it was thirty years ago and paid attention to those total viewers, but ABC changed everything when they started advertising themselves as the #1 network (in demos, in the fine print below), and I don't know if they're ever coming back from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Johnnysbro- I am a huge OLTL fan and find their ratings embarrassing.

Totally undeserved. And I know there are some serious OLTL haters here who just love it! (I don't quite get the gloating- they seem to really hate Carlivati- but I can deal lol)

Like I said earlier (and I basically go by what you report here) Valentini must be a budgeting master with OLTL's ratings being what they are- AMC is oddly getting all of this cancellation buzz and OLTL is never even mentioned- He must be a budgeting guru. And the show generally looks pretty good, no less.

And let's not forget that OLTL's DVR numbers are almost as low as GL's- Another nail in the coffin.

And yeah November sweeps was excellent, and surprisingly the show hooked those viewers for 3 weeks.

Its such a bizarre industry where a soap like Days is this close to being cancelled (and is a strong # 3 in the ratings and at the top of the demos) and a show like OLTL which is now middle to last in demos, and tanks in the DVR- seems to be floating by unscathed...

The whole thing is weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing about it is you have to look at budgets as well. AMC and DAYS were expensive. DAYS is operating on a much lower budget and Gary Tomlin is saving the show money. He actually works really fast as an executive producer. I really miss Ed Scott but his type of production values were costly for the show. Cheaper production and someone who can work with Dena as Corday adores her. AMC has alot of restructering to do and GH is VERY EXPENSIVE TO PRODUCE. They have alot of higher paying vets. I think OLTL's ratings could be better but with a show that went underbudget in 2008 and a great November sweeps, It hink the best is yet to come. It has not YO-YOED AT ALL. ATWT seems to YO-YO alot. GL had good news though with it's numbers going up, I hope they can get up to a 1.8 to 1.9 for Grant's return. If they do this and get those numbes up there and sustain, they might get a one year renewel. The show while down alot of viewers rise from last year, the show is producing alot more money. Wheeler is working the kinks out alot, the show is much better looking then a year ago even though there seems to be more work that needs to be done. The actor closes ups are not there, the sound has improved, and the camera is not as shaky. On OLTL front there were NO CUTS AT ALL, nobody took any paycuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think one of the things that maybe some may have to do is what I have tired to do.

Range said that OLTL's ratings are underserved, and yes that might be the case when the show has been good. But at the same time we have to remember that even though they aren't deserved and not what they could be or should be - at least they are not tanking.

As said many times before ratings have nothing to do with quality. A great deal of it has to do with viewer loyalty, viewer enjoyment. Just look at Days for example, the quality of the show was definitely better under the writing staff that accompanied Sheffer and with Ed Scott - but as said before the cost of that type of production was high, Scott didn't get along with Dena or Corday and caused lots of unheval backstage, and much of the stuff they tried to do changed Days too much. Many of Sheffer's stories didn't fit the Days formula. They would have fit 20 to 30 years ago but the new Days that was developed in the 90's - the change was too drastic. With the quality the ratings were bad and just kept getting worse.

Days is not at it highest quality level right now, but I hear more and more people say that it feels like Days now.

Anyway the point was that ratings and quality don't go hand in hand.

If OLTL can continue to keep the balance, and Ron can get on a even plane with stories. His tenure has been plagued with some uneveness that has hurt him - some of it like the strike was not his fault and some I feel has been.

Days has steadily built because Tomlin esp. has helped things a great deal. You can tell a big difference in even the tone of the scenes and stuff since he took over.

If OLTL can get on a more even tone and not up and down then eventually the ratings will stabilize or go up some slowly. OLTL destroyed viewer confidence over the last few years and slowly drove it's core audience away. The fact that the ratings are stabilizing for them indicates that they are finally starting to hold onto a new core audience and now they just have to build on that.

ABC shows esp. have relied on that ratings stunt spikes for survival over the last few years. Alot of people keep referring to those. I just don't see them as a sign of good ratings at all. For me the true picture comes from viewing the stagnant or stable ratings and that is where the true picture is coming from. What I see is AMC and OLTL not crashign and burning after the spikes as they once did. That tells me that they are once again building a core audience who is sticking around for the day to day stuff.

IF they can do that the daily ratings will look better but also it will make for bigger spikes during sweeps when they do pull the stunts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What a wonderful photo! It really is a shame that Peacock will not show those early years. I know I'd love to see them!
    • With the death of Days and GH actress, Denise Alexander, someone posted this in the Days thread, a '60s-era photo of some of the cast, which lists the names. In the upper left, is a young Susan Flannery, who obviously ended up playing Stephanie Forrester on B&B, who was one of a few actresses to play Dr. Laura Horton [mother to Mike and Jennifer Horton] on Days. Here is a link to the photo: https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/38014-days-behind-the-scenes-articlesphotos/?do=findComment&comment=2022200  
    • https://parade.com/news/days-of-our-lives-star-susan-seaforth-hayes-pays-heartfelt-tribute-to-denise-alexander-a-friend-to-treasure

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sorry, there must have been a error, while creating the file. I redone it and it has audio
    • Tamara Tunie was on a local CBS affiliate in Baltimore the other day talking about a few things she had going on, BTG amongst them: "Beyond the Gates" star Tamara Tunie is in Baltimore for the Reginald F. Lewis Museum's 20th anniversary
    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy