Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I think they are very ideological and cold but I don't believe they would have done anything like that. The Kochs in particular always seem to try to keep a step back and are focused on their image. 

 

Some other people supporting Trump, I wouldn't be shocked...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6818

  • DRW50

    5992

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I think he's terrified of whatever things his father put in his head many decades ago, but I don't think he has the ability to process the world. 

 

I don't know how many here ever saw that Doctor Who episode where Celia Imrie is a big villain and at the end is regressed to a crying child in a grown woman's body, but that's what he reminds me of sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No one ever taught Trump much of anything. He doesn't have a fraction of the intellect of those guys.

 

He's absolutely scared and angry, and when that happens he rages like he did today on Twitter during the hearings. I think he's been scared and angry most of his life. Watch, he'll go off tonight at his Kentucky rally.

 

The alt-left, meanwhile, is losing its [!@#$%^&*] over the Russia reveal. Guys like Glenn Greenwald, Michael Tracey, etc. who have passionately defended Russia and RT against the slings and arrows of 'corrupt Democrats' are very upset today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The Steele dossier stated outright that the Russians used the DNC hack to drive people towards Sanders at Clinton's expense. I'd be interested to see where some of his $27 donations came from. He played right into their hands and will never acknowledge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't be bothered to shift focus to Bernie - there's not a lot of upside there right now - but watching the WhataboutAmerica Gang (Greenwald, Tracey, even Matt Taibbi, whose very dry piece on today's hearings opens by snidely suggesting America has propaganda networks just like RT and also, surveillance state!) fall all over themselves to explain away Russia is extremely entertaining. They're getting roasted on Twitter.

 

Meanwhile, the WH is in civil war. Again.


Also, Weathervane Joe tilts anew:

 

 

 

Jeffrey Wright (yes, that one) is a man after my own heart:

 

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, I've been too bogged down by personal matters to be as concerned as I have been about TrumpCo.  (I can take only so much drama, ya know?)  But I am glad the FBI has officially, on-the-record launched their investigation into Russia.  Part of me doubts much will come of it.  Nevertheless, I'm glad someone in such a capacity is doing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The new Greenwald target is Louise Mensch, who I admit to being a conspiracy pusher, but part of her analysis has been correct. She was the first one to report the FISA warrant before it was know and it turns out now it's know pretty much to be true.

 

And I don't understand Greenwald at all. Is it that everything America is awful, but he seems to have a narrower target, the democrats. No matter what anyone does it's always back to the awful democrats, the hypocrites, how obsessed the dems are with Russia, how Sanders is the most popular politician in the country, etc. I really don't get it.

 

 

The investigation was launched last July and they have confirmed Russian interference and their alleged intentions. There is an ongoing investigation. They are investigating potential collusion with the Trump campaign but they will not confirm or deny who is being investigated.

 

Spicer today called Flynn a small volunteer for the Trump campaign, that Manafort played a minor role, obviously trying to distance themselves from those most likely under scrutiny at the present time. Forget Flynn was part of the intelligence briefings provided to Trump when he was running for president and that Manafort was Trumps campaign manager, and that Trumps dialogue on Nato suddenly turned negative when Manafort joined the campaign.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Louise Mensch is nuts and should not be trusted IMO, but Greenwald is only going after her because of ego and his own deeply rooted anti-Western bias.

 

Greenwald never grew out of his years fighting the Bush cabal. He was drummed out of leftist circles in those days for turning on everyone, then came back with Snowden. He was a libertarian to begin with, and he'll never stop fighting the same war where the evil American empire is always the central enemy and he is the daring rebel, so Russia (and any other power) becomes a friend. Even as Greenwald, a gay man, aligns himself with Putin's anti-gay empire.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In Duterte news...not that this actually effects any policy in the Philippines, but this is some of the most egregious backtracking and lying I've seen even for modern politics. When I read that he'd previously supported gay marriage I thought it was just the generic statements that even Trump made, that you know don't really mean a whole lot, but no, he was actually going on about how the Bible should be Adam, Eve, and the gays. And now he's going on about how people want to stop men and women as marriage, and also making transphobic comments. 

 

I wonder if he's still popular over there or if his insability has worn off the shine.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/world/asia/duterte-same-sex-marriage-philippines.html?_r=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Since the Catholic Church wields enormous influence in the Philippines, I doubt statements like these will have much effect on Duterte's popularity.

 

From what I've read, it was his promises to crack down on crime that help him ascend to the presidency from mayor of a city.  And in killing thousands of people and labeling them drug traffickers, after the fact, has convinced a large portion of society that he is fulfilling his biggest promise.

If anything diminishes his political prospects down the road, it will be if something goes horribly awry with his self-proclaimed 'War on Drugs' or if his police kill the 'wrong' person(s) or if the carnage becomes too diffuse and too bloody for the people to continue to stomach.

 

Duterte has definitely had his battles with the Catholic Church. He blames them for thwarting his efforts to institute family planning services and distribute birth control and sex education nationwide- the Philippines has the world's highest teenage pregnancy rates. It doesn't surprise me that Duterte would go back on such a promise as gay union, he knows there will be little to no repercussions in doing so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m sensing you’re not really a John Black fan from your posts. This has been some of the best soap Days has done in many years but you seem completely opposed to it lol.
    • The John Black character has been a part of my life for decades. I like heroes being honored, however imperfect they may be.  I'm glad they are giving him a long farewell and tribute.
    • Annie Dutton was anything, but sane when she was introduced.  She was very tortured and looked like she was on the verge of tears when she was first introduced.   While people, and writers, made it seem as though Annie lost her mind because of Josh.. I truly think that Annie had a lot of untreated mental issues that didn't manifest until her marriage to Josh. Sonni was also anything, but strong when she was first introduced either.   Claire in 1983 was a complete 180 from the Claire that we got in 1986... and I do agree that her character was degraded.
    • I remember seeing him briefly when Rick went to confront her about her blackmailing him. (I briefly forgot that Rick's sleeping with Claire at this time was a retcon - or her lying that she slept with him, whatever that story was). I wonder if he interacted with Kurt given that Mark Lewis later took his ATWT role. I tried to watch some of the full episode and it was all so alien and uninvolving. Roxy having a meltdown on that construction site for Mindy and Kurt's house that never gets built. Ed with Ross and Vanessa dealing with custody issues. Even Ross and Vanessa seemed flat, with Vanessa seeming oddly meek.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy