Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with you and I think it has happened all over the country.  Sure, it's a little more shocking in places like NYC where you think people are more cosmopolitan. However, I've lived in many parts of this country and there was a pretty strong veneer of acceptance for the most part. Of course racism is always there, but now it's emboldened. People are just flat out coming out with it with no sense of shame and they even feel justified in committing acts of violence.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I saw the headline on this yesterday, and it struck me as a purely political move to try to cut through the backlash she received regarding the acceptance of Syrian refugees before the coming elections.

 

When France tried to implement this policy, I don't think it had the intended consequences- in fact, I think it ratcheded up the rhetoric even more with no beneficial results to anyone except the Burkini lady.

We'll see, I guess. (shrugs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The idea is likely to appeal to middle-class voters, but what it really does is leave those who are affected by the ban feeling dejected and angry, while leaving those who ardently support the ban wanting more and more. It's outdated pandering for a modern world where there is less and less of a "middle." And the segregation of Muslims in Europe is one of the reasons this has built up so much - these types of policies won't make that any better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Many European countries had a policy of what amounted to letting in a lot of people from predominantly Muslim countries but essentially keeping them segregated. Some said that people should be "forced" to follow new customs, to learn the native tongue, this and that, but that doesn't really work either. What would work is a policy that allows for and encourages integration and yet respects the culture of the immigrant. Some say, "Respecting the culture means you encourage bigotry and treating women like property" and so on, but that doesn't have to be the case. That's just a stereotype because it's easier to scapegoat millions of people. Many of these people are leaving their country because they want and need a new life. If they are allowed the opportunity then they may want to be more like their new world. They are instead essentially kept at arm's length and reminded that they're strangers. 

 

The US used to be better at assimilating new cultures (although I realize they had far less mass immigration than France, Germany, Netherlands, etc. in recent years), but with the fearmongering, polarization, and open bigotry and violence against not just immigrants, but people who have been here all their lives and just happen to have a skin color that is deemed unacceptable, that is less and less likely to be the case. I really want to believe that the best of American ideals and freedoms will survive even in these coming years. 

 

This Taiwan stuff gets more and more strange. We live in an odd world when Bob Dole, a man who essentially was relegated to Viagara ads after 1996, has more influence on our international policies than the State Department. 

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/bob-dole-donald-trump-taiwan-232266

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The other day, I had posted on my FB the story of the American Vanguard poster that showed up on Purdue's campus claiming that white supremacists "we have a right to exist".  When I shared that, I added a post stating that I don't believe they do have a right to exist.

 

So, a few of my "friends" took issue with that and called me out, saying "they have every right to exist".  One of them was surprising, the other not so much.  How did we get to a time when white supremacists are being defended?  It's crazy.

 

I've defriended their asses in the meantime.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess I believe they have the right to exist. Isn't the whole point of the 1st amendment to defend thought and speech we not only disagree with, but may find abhorrent? Recently, it's certainly crossed my mind that I wouldn't mind following the European model of restricting hate speech, but at the same time seeing Trump in charge makes me wary of restricting people's 1st Amendment rights. Also, in the age of the internet I don't know how we could stop them from existing even if we were inclined to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is the defense of free speech but history tells us to be wary of when speech crosses the line into action.

 

The problem is that in America, there has been a history of white supremacists also being terrorists. The Klan would most likely be regarded as a white supremacists group yet historically their members were known for committing crimes like cross-burnings on the lawns of Black families in the South, as well as lynchings and kidnappings. 

Sure, now they are known for marching and meetings in conference suites in federal buildings but White supremacists also have a history of transgressing beyond hateful speech.

 

For someone like me, who would most likely be in their cross-hairs, it becomes muddled and more complex than a simple question of whether they have the right to exist as an entity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Totally agree. Any time they cross that line into violence they need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  I know that I can't fully understand what black people go through when it comes to these groups, but I do take my child to the Jewish community center most days. You can bet after what happened in Kansas there are days when I've sat in my car and wondered if it's really right to take him to a high value target. I'm more afraid of a white supremacist with a gun than I am a jihadist. Still, I get that I have a choice and no one is going to randomly assault us at Target because of our skin color.

Edited by Juliajms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy