Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

He really messed up this time. Just as he was given chance to prance around like GOD SAVED ME, he does this meme-material with the cats and dogs. And the sweetness of it comes from the fact that he bit his own leg again. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We can mock the insanity, of course.

I have seen several musical memes about the eating pets statement.
I saw one that was set to the the music soundtrack of Peanuts/Charlie.Brown/Snoopy TV specials.

But racism isn't funny. at all.  I just cannot.

I think that the memes tend to "normalize" or "lighthearten" racism, even if unintentionally. 
Especially if these memes are spread on tiktok without context.
Or if the meme-maker's total motivation is to be trendy and get clicks.

Context matters.  Of course it was great that Kamala laughed at him on the debate stage!

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I am willing to believe that Trump has exaggerated his injury, I find it hard to believe that even MAGA staged an incident that killed a bystander and resulted in the death of the shooter. Or are those deaths supposed to be lies to make the story convincing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Nuzzi article from "New York" Magazine (nymag.com) (not NewYorker)
is on the Media thread, but worth linking here on the Politics thread, too,
https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/56478-the-mediajournalism-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1956355
as such contempt for the truth is sadly how the press commonly writes politics.

 

This is from NYMag's latest website headlines, so maybe this is what @DRW50 is now referencing?

"Is the Entire World Conspiring to Make It Look Like Trump Lost the Debate? An intriguing theory by Matt Taibbi."
Taibbi's post-debate column amasses suspicious evidence of media collusion

-- a piece by Jonathan Chait, for the "Intelligencer" part of nymag.com
in which Chait is writing about what Taibbi said.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-lost-debate-matt-taibbi-kamala-harris.html

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy