Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Netanyahu to address Joint Session of Congress Wed. July 24, 2024.

The usual procedure for a Joint Session of Congress (the House and Senate all meeting together) ... would be:
the Vice President of USA is also president of the Senate, and the VP sits on the dais next to the Speaker of the House. 
The VP as president of the Senate, is the presiding officer.

Kamala Harris as VP and thus president of the Senate, would preside,
however she will *not* attend.  She had a prior commitment that was planned long before Biden dropped out of the election.  Kamala Harris will be in Indianapolis for the Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. Grand Boulé.
More about that here:
(Link from WPTA channel 21 news)
and here (Link from AP)
(Link to event site)
Organization's site https://zphib1920.org/

Harris could chose to skip that and be at Congress, but has declined to change her plans.

The next in line to preside would be Senator Patty Murray of the State of Washington, as she is President Pro Tempore of the Senate.   But Murray has declined to preside and released a statement: "Securing a lasting, mutual ceasefire is of the utmost importance right now, and I will continue to push for one to be reached as soon as possible. I hope Prime Minister Netanyahu will use the opportunity to address how he plans to secure a ceasefire – and lasting peace in the region."

As of the most recent update I read, the role of presider for this event will be Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland, who is the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, so apparently he'll be seated on the dais?

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois is the Senate Majority Whip and he is boycotting the Netanyahu speech.  He said in a statement on Tuesday that Israel’s war in Gaza under Netanyahu’s direction "is a brutal strategy beyond any acceptable level of self-defense", adding: "I will stand by Israel, but I will not stand and cheer its current prime minister at tomorrow’s joint session."

Quotes from Murray and Durbin via The Guardian live blog on Wed. July 24. (Link)   More quotes from other politicians at that link as well.


From Doug Adams of NBC:
https://x.com/DougNBC/status/1816093108133658963
The #NBC Capitol Hill team says more than 30 House & Senate Democrats are planning to skip Netanyahu’s speech today to Congress.
Some will boycott it entirely.
Others will listen from their offices instead of the chamber.
And some have planned counter-programming events.

 

J.D. Vance is scheduled to skip Netanyahu's speech and and instead will be at a fundraising event in Fort Wayne, Indiana, hosted by the Indiana businessman Bill Bean.

Various reports say that Biden or Harris, or both?
will meet with Netanyahu at the White House on Thurs. July 25.
This has been updated a few times, so I'm not certain who/when.

Supposedly (?) Netanyahu will meet with Tr*mp at Mar-a-Lago on Friday July 26.

 

Edit: the Guardian live blog says Chuck Schumer will attend Netanyahu's speech to Congress,
but Nancy Pelosi will NOT attend.

Bernie Sanders gave a speech yesterday on the Senate floor in which he pointed out that Netanyahu is a war criminal and therefore should not be addressing Congress.

 

Edit again per the Guardian live blog.  Apparently Netanyahu brought with him some Israelis who are family members of those who were captured by Hamas on Oct. 7, (and/or there are Americans who are now in Washington DC who are relatives of the captives, and currently connecting with Netanyahu?)
*** Some of the politicians who are not attending the speech, will be instead meeting with those family/relatives of the captives.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That, too.  Either way, many women and young girls who are in sex trafficking are not in it because they enjoy having sex; and our society's insistence on branding them as harlots and jezebels who deserve whatever retribution comes their way is just plain wrong.

If I were on Team Trump, I would be thinking very carefully about our options regarding JD Vance.  He's giving me Sarah Palin vibes, and we know how that went down, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I have observed from speaking with people in real life, as well as what I've seen online, it seems that there have been Democrats who are younger or youth who have been upset about Biden's stance on the Israel/Gaza situation.   It would seem that some of them who were despairing or apathetic are now energized to vote for Harris because her stance on Israel/Gaza seems to be more aware of the bigger picture.

I'm not sure what I think about all of that, but that's what I have observed.   This could affect the outcome of the election.

_________________________________________________
 

From The Guardian (Link)

In the two days after Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race, Vote.org recorded its highest number of new voter registrations over a 48-hour period that the organization has seen during the 2024 cycle, the organization told the Guardian.

The organization said in a statement that the site saw a roughly 700% increase in daily new voter registrations during that period, totaling over 38,500. Young voters, aged 18 to 34, made up the bulk (83%) of those registrations, the organization added.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Several of my FB friends believed Joe Biden was a "bad candidate" for that very reason.  (One in particular - who, by the way, is not at all sorry to see Biden go - also cited his administration's border policies, which my friend (and former classmate) called "cruel").

I, myself, reasoned that that was one area where Biden was perhaps too "old school" to understand the complexities of the situation.  What might have been true about Israel and Palestine in the '60's, '70's, '80's and even '90's isn't necessarily what's still true today.  Nevertheless, I didn't believe that was enough to keep the man from serving another term as our president.

Plus, for those younger voters, it's just a change from having to choose between two, old, white guys, which, I will admit, was always going to be tough to get them to do, especially if they're old enough to remember Barack Obama.

Now, it's Trump and Trump alone who is looked upon as the Old White Guy in the race; and that, coupled with J.D. Vance proving already to be a mistake as his running mate, means his campaign team's job just got a whole lot harder.  That's why I think it's crucial for Harris' VP pick to be a relatively safe choice: white, male, Christian (although, not necessarily evangelical) and heterosexual.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, but not because they want to leave the hostages in Gaza and Hamas to regroup. 

Honestly, it makes me sick that I have to vote for the party that those disgusting protesters are a part of.  They make Democrats look like a bunch of terrorist supporting crackpots. They were literally cheering for Hamas and raising their flag.

I'm sure preventing Jewish students from going to their classes, boycotting Jewish business and shooting up Jewish day schools was all to free Gaza though. The open antisemitism is horrific, but not that surprising.

Not to mention all that death to America bullshit. No thank you. It doesn't even matter to me that this was funded by Iran. They found enough people to go along with them. Still, as disgusted as I am that some leaders in our party are rape denying shills of Iran, I will still vote D.

You don't even have to say. Even JD Vance knows what he is. That's what makes him even more despicable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't believe Israel can completely Hamas out without killing a lot more people (which they shouldn't). Gaza is much smaller than Iraq, so I think it's a little easier to destroy their military command centers. 

There's a reason diplomacy has failed over and over in this conflict. You have people who believe they are serving God by becoming martyrs versus the Jews who believe they need their own country and army to survive. What I've seen over the last eight months makes me think they are right. It's tragic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's that black and white. First, there have been protests again in Israel by citizens against Netanyahu. They want him gone.  They see how little if anything he did to get hostages released.  There were reports not that long ago in Israeli papers how Netanyahu actually yelled at some of the families of the hostages, basically telling them to get over it. Not exactly that but that was the intent.

Second, people keep thinking Hamas is a group of people. That is the same mistake the US made about Al Qaeda.  It's not. You can't destroy an ideology. Biden early on tried to warn the Israeli Gvmt based on our own experiences after 9/11. They didn't listen and I believe Netanyahu in particular, had no intention of listening. I found his address to congress today nauseating. All he's done is prolong things to save his own skin. And this may be unpopular to say, but I think he intentionally allowed the attack which he was warned was in the works for over a year.  Heck for as much as he claims Hamas is a terrorist group, of course they are, what did he do to stop them. Nothing.  It's like he wanted it to happen. He authorized the release of money to Hamas 3 weeks before the attack and nothing has happened to the Hamas leadership in Qatar.  

Now they have killed how many thousands of innocent children trying to destroy an ideology.  Again, how did that work out for the US. Al Qaeda still exists and our involvement in Iraq helped to create ISIS.  And I have ZERO desire for the US to be pulled into a war with Iran that Bibi is itching for. This is not Iraq. Iran actually has serious military capabilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy