Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I was just wondering when so many millions will stop worshipping this man and recognize him for the scumbag he was. Also, I believe that the age of majority back in the 60s was 21; thus, given that this intern was 19, the affair may very well have been illegal.

The fact that she didn't cash in back then says a lot about her character. Actually, according to the article I posted, it wasn't until 2003 until the public was even aware of her; that year, a JFK biographer mentioned that he had an affair with "a tall, slender, beautiful 19-year-old college sophomore and White House intern, who worked in the press office." Since she was "outed" involuntarily, I am assuming that this intern chose to write this book to tell her side of the story.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Florida Republicans are trying to ban people on food stamps from being able to buy cookies, soda, or candy (even if it's for a child's birthday).

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/florida-gop-to-food-stamp-recipients-no-sweets-for-you.php?ref=fpb

I get the idea behind this. The problem is the Republicans spent 2011 berating Michelle Obama for trying to teach kids about healthy eating. They said this was socialism, that she was trying to force her views on people.

Is it OK to do this if it involves those who are lowest in the caste system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No Max, it wasn't. Present age of consent laws were enacted between 1895 and 1920. I personally think 18 is even too high... I agree with the Canadian and England laws which set it at 16. It always puzzles me when people try to have sex with underage people, are they that stupid? If you are the type that feels compelled to do it with a teeanger (when your'e an adult) then move to effing Brazil or something, where the age is 13. But JFK is definately not guilty of anything like that. You might be surprsied to learn that from the birth of our country, up till almost 1900, the age of majority in the United states was 12. In some states, like Delaware, it was 7. That really grossed me out. As far all this inside JFK info, I only want to know how big his penis was smile.png

Edited by alphanguy74
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Alphanguy, I wasn't sure if the sexual relationship was legal or not, so thanks for clarifying the matter. (I still think it was morally reprehensible for a 45 year-old man--in a position of authority--to be taking advantage of a 19 year-old intern for his own pleasure. It was also very hypocritical, since JFK always portrayed himself as an upstanding family man.)

I assumed (incorrectly) that age of consent laws likely mirrored voting laws (and, of course, the official voting age was 21 to vote until 1971). However, as reflected in my comments, I was never 100% certain if the affair was illegal, since having the right to vote (or not having it) at a certain age doesn't always equate to other rights: for instance, one still has to be 21 to purchase alcohol, and somebody 18 years-old could serve in the armed forces even before 1971.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72583.html

Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri voted tonight. These are beauty contests, with no delegates. Santorum won all three. Missouri was always tipped for him, but Minnesota and especially Colorado were seen as more of surprises. Minnesota, home of Michelle Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty, is no real surprise to me (here's a heartbreaking example of the effects of far right hatred in Bachmann's district - http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/one-towns-war-on-gay-teens-20120202 ). Colorado is a surprise, as it has a fairly strong Mormon population and Romney had spent time there.

This basically just reaffirms that many GOP voters do not like Romney and will support him when they have to, but are sending him a message now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just read a comment saying "Man on dog beats dog on man's roof."

Anyway, the most entertaining part of this night for me was that the old media favorite "T-Paw", breathlessly hyped by some in the press as the true "Sam's Club conservative" (whatever that means), totally failed to deliver Minnesota for Romney. He got Romney third. I guess "T-Paw" will still laugh all the way to the bank, but it doesn't say much for his popularity in the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl... here in Missouri the turnout in the urban areas was 3%, and the rest of the state was 7%... and people are really PISSED that the state spent 7 million dollars for all this, and it didn't even count. All these republicans in the rural areas just all vote the straight abortion ticket. That's what this is all about. the RNC totally is aware that there's no chance in hell that Santorum will deliver the IMPORTANT states in a general election, like Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That cracks me up. I guess those were protest votes.

I wonder how Cain would be doing if he hadn't dropped out.

I don't know a lot about Missouri Republicans (the one I probably read most on recently was the disastrous lt. governor, Kinder) but there don't seem to be as many ugly national headlines about their bigoted ideas and laws, as you hear again and again from Republicans in Minnesota, Arizona, Virginia, etc.

I get so tired of hearing about how it's jobs and the focus will be on jobs. It's ALWAYS about the culture war. Just look at the virulent social engineering of the last two years, when supposedly that wasn't going to matter. And now we get nothing but obsession over birth control or abortion. We're moving towards the point where birth control will be treated as some disgusted perversion for whores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While other presidents have had affairs, I kind of doubt that most were womanizers to the extent JFK was.

Scotty, asking me why I singled JFK out is a very valid question. The reason I did so was because he has been so hyped up and overrated far beyond that of any other president (even Reagan). Its not just is presidential accomplishments that have been grossly overstated; the myth still persists that JFK was a man of morals and character (witness a recent biography written by Chris Matthews, which the author said was an "uplifting" story).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy