Jump to content

More Fallout From Last Year's WGA Strike


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Actually, if you go to the Nikki Finke site, and follow the link to the original post (about who went FiCore), you'll see over 100 comments. Most of those comments...largely by writers...are quite understanding of the soap ficores.

Summarizing those opinions: (a) soaps are a dying genre; (B) soap writers are not the huge earners, and (B) the key issues behind the strike (i.e., internet residuals) aren't really a big deal for soaps.

I'm not really expressing an opinion here...I'm clearly ambivalent...but it is fair to say not EVERYONE disagrees with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The funny thing is understand why soap writers had to go fi-core. Daytime is a dying industry and might not be around in a few years. It was different for primetime writers/films where DVD residuals/streaming residuals were key to strike but not key for daytime writers. I admire those who stuck it out. The ones that kept their status were Ron Carlivati, David Kriezman, Jean Passanante and a few others. You cannot fault the others that needed to do this. I mean this is the worst economy in decades with huge levels of unemployment, foreclosure, bankruptcy and repos. Especially since that the WGA was fighting for does not pertain to daytime writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The people who went on strike and picketed made the decision they felt was best for them. The people who went Fi-Core made the decision that they felt was best for them. Judging someone else for not making the same choice as you did is ridiculous and petty. It's ass backwards... "Here are your two options, but we'll make sure we make you feel like scum if you pick one over the other..."

THEN DON'T PUT THE OPTION ON THE TABLE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You said it yourself. Everybody did what they felt was best and I believe that grown adults should always be given choices but with choices come consequences.

The people on the picket line had to deal with the consequences of that choice and the Fi-Cores have to do the same. It's not about judging people for not making the same decision, its about the fact that the fi-cores didn't risk what other union members did so they aren't entitled to the same benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's just turning into a damn witch hunt. I love writing and that's first and foremost with me. I'm not a professional writer or a guild member, so I don't necessarily know what choice I would've made if I were in that position and if I were in that position, what factors would be present at that time to influence my decision. But I will say this, if this is not about the art or the work, but about who sided with the popular crowd and who didn't, then I say they all should restrict the Fi-Core writers from receiving any benefits from this latest strike/negotiation and any others in the future, and be done with it. You don't light the fuse and then get mad at the dynamite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am so anti union it's not even funny, and the writers strike is no different to me, so this is sort of bizarre coming from me. Those who went on strike bore financial consequences for a principle, and to garner contract concessions for the future. As is almost always the case, many of those who went on strike will never receive the benefits that came out of those negotiations. The purpose of the strike was to force the corporations to divide the financial pie more equitably among the writers, and while that goal was achieved, the pie shrunk and there are also now fewer people among whom to divide it. Many writers lost their jobs, perhaps permanently, and in fact, many writing positions were eliminated, so there are fewer jobs to vy for.

So while it is correct to say that those writers who went fi-core made a decision that was legal, albeit self serving, in the name of fairness it hardly seems right that they will reap the benefits of the bargaining tool, which they refused to participate and make the sacrifice to earn said benefits. JMO, but something about this is just offensive to my sense of fairness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a sense I agree. Kick the Fi-Cores out of the guild and be done with it. The stigma of what they did will follow them into future jobs regardless of what the Guild does so they're essentially blacklisted anyway. (I know that if I were a showrunner I wouldn't hire one) and this is turning into quite the administrative mess. Cut them loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least the fi-core writers were honest about it. What about all the soap writers who walked the picket lines during the day and then went home to finish off their scripts that were due the next day?

Barbara Esensten & James Harmon Brown didn't write AMC by themselves. Garin Wolfe and Michael Conforti didn't write GH by themselves. There were more people writing scripts at OLTL than just Michelle Poteet Lisanti and Jeanne Marie Ford.

I remember one interview with Michelle Patrick where she said that she had been approached by a show on another network that asked her to secretly write for them. She said no. But I'm sure for everyone like her that said no there was another writer who agreed to work in the darkness for a show.

Those people I have a problem with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honest or "in your face". At least those who refused to do their work in the light of day recognized that they were crossing a line, and were trying to avoid the consequences. The fi-core writers thumbed their noses at the strikers. I don't have any respect for either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In case it is of interest to anyone here, I have digital copies (computer files, mp4 etc.) of all of the episodes. And, besides having the files they are all up on my usual video hosting site, acct name: shallotpeel, channel it is in: Primetime Soaps and file names like  Flamingo Road S1E15 Hurricane Flamingo Road was a primetime soap on NBC by Lorimar Productions. 2 seasons. 1980-1982. Morgan Fairchild, Barbara Rush. Developed by Rita Lakin.   
    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy