Jump to content

AMC: Bobby Martin


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the lack of history is what makes Bobby that much more of a viable character. The only thing we really know about him is that he skis. Maybe he is a former athlete past his prime, who returns to Pine Valley after an injury leaves him unable to continue doing the one thing he loves. He was so focused on his career that he wrote of his family, his friends, and any chance of falling in love. There are so many available women in PV, I think a character like Bobby would have his pick of the litter.

Again, wishful thinking, haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not Bobby Warner, Bobby Martin -- the character who went up to the attic to get his skis.... and never was heard from again.

Does anyone know exactly how long he lasted? A few weeks? A couple months? I know his "exit" was in 1970, so it was definitely shorter than a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bringing him back would be nothing more than novelty, IMO. If they ever do another comedic episode any time soon, that's where they should mention him or whatever. But in the real timeline of the show? Nah, not so much. It'd be the same as rewriting history.

I'm all for bringing back Paul and having him be with a new wife and maybe have children/grandchildren (when was the last time he appeared? 1995?). The fact that he hasn't been on the show in forever is perfect as is the fact that he doesn't have many connections. Why must a character be a recent character with assloads of connections in order to return? The writers should do the work themselves to make the character relevant to newer viewers and to create new connections with the character. Is it really far-fetched to believe that Paul Martin would return to Pine Valley, the place he called home for many years? It's actually more far-fetched to have him stay away so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my fan fic when I was writing (and hope to start back soon) I was in the process of bring Paul back with a wife and 3 older children. He has been gone long enough for that to happen.

I would rather see him back and there could have been so many times in the last few years with new families that it could have been done or easily substituted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, I'm all for bringing back (seemingly) long-forgotten characters, or hitherto unmentioned relatives opposed to islanded characters or small families that are poorly written for. I really hate it when they bring in a new fam, they get shoved down our throats, and they have no interesting let alone memorable qualities. next thing you know, they're gone. I mentioned this in another thread, but I would have liked to see relatives for Erica for example (I said a Kane aunt played by Marla Adams). But maybe some first cousins, nieces, nephews. Instead of more insta-kids, AMC could take a cue from Viki and Dorian as far as building a family and potential s/ls are concerned. Or instead of random new families, how about some new families that are actually from Pine Valley who have old relationships with characters that just have yet to be explored. Some high school classmates of Erica, or Tad, Jesse, and Angie, even Juanita Ramsey's grandchildren...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"I'm all for bringing back Paul and having him be with a new wife and maybe have children/grandchildren (when was the last time he appeared? 1995?)."

I don't even remember him back in '95, but they had so many blinka dn you miss them cameos he coulda been. To be fair he'd be pretty old--he was Joe's older bro I think.

What I don't get is why they don't bring back more characters related to old long gone characters. It just makes sense to me...

"Or instead of random new families, how about some new families that are actually from Pine Valley who have old relationships with characters that just have yet to be explored."

EXACTLY. It seems like it would just provide so much more story potential

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paul is the younger brother of Joe.

He was fresh out of the Vietnam war when he came back to Pine Valley.

I am not sure what age he was supposed to be, but I remember in the late 70's one of Anne's letters to Paul from the mental institution talked about Ellen Shepherd and the years before when they were in school together - so all them had to be about the same age. And Anne and Ellen were clearly younger than Joe.

I know the few Martin Family trees I have seen posted have Paul as the 2nd child too.

When Paul came back to Pine Valley he had been missing in action for a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Paul is the younger Martin as well. Though I cannot imagine him being much younger than Joe as he was already Lawyer. I have a bio for him here: http://pinevalleybulletin.com/Quick%20Guid...MartinPaul.html

He was present at the Martin 1995 Housewarming, an event that I think is yet to be surpassed on television. He and Erica had a few moments remembering the time around Jason Maxwell's murder. I think he and his family would be a great addition to the fold. I know Bill Mooney, like many of the 70s stars, is still working. He could have a kid or two a little younger than Jake and really fall well into that fold. I think it would be better for him to be a widow to give him potential for romance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://open.spotify.com/episode/0IpB5NK9ZNQZwia6TXuC4Q?si=Nu_WeuRfRmu9jFa_j5K8MA&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A0wheD3U5P0DszKcR1BxEHW
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
    • Gone are the days where at least once every week, a character would pull a gun on someone (Ron you really turned gun violence into a joke on this show)
    • Oooooo I like these. I like we are on the same page about Little Brownie Man. And I hope to remember this at the end of June to see how much of it came to pass. I definitely feel that the Eva vs Kat story is about to reaaaally get going.    As for the B/C stories, it's funny you mentioned the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story first. Because out of all of those, it is the only one that has enough structure and build to it that it could keep going as a B story that could eventually climax. I think the only POV we don't have in it is Joey's at this point because Month 2 put in the work to give us Doug's and Vanessa's and they are now circling each other and their relationship. And we still need to know Joey's endgame.   Why we gotta pick on Jacob and Naomi? We need that goody good couple. lol. They talked about how they got together. Mind you, very briefly. But we do need to know a little bit more about both. Something I was hoping we were getting by having them in their own stories....him with the crooked cop, her with the lawsuit...but it didn't turn out as hoped. Hopefully, that won't be the case with June though.   Yeah, I want to see more of THAT Ashley.  I finally had to break down and explain to my manager why I keep laughing every time I see the bottle of Febreze at work. The product placement definitely be working.
    • I’m one of those people

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That is a specific example where I would agree with those fans so I would be critical of the execs doing so. I frankly think that "caring" in this regard is not conducive to dialog. Basically you point out its very subjective nature. What is caring to one person might be callous disregard to another. I suggest it is a trap & we fell in it!
    • Does anyone know of a place where I could watch older episodes of RC??? I really would love to watch more of this show, and I would decide if I would join the save River city campaign, I HATE when soaps are killed, but sometimes you should let them go too
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy