Jump to content

OLTL/AW: Robin Strasser as Rachel


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

She could have, but I doubt she would have much enjoyed it. Robin likes playing the heavy, and frankly I think that's what she's born to play... it's hard for me to imagine her playing a weepy, vulnerable heroine (but maybe I'm biased as mid-'90s Dorian Lord is perhaps my most favorite female soap character of all time). And once Susan Lucci's Erica shot into the stratosphere, I think Robin Strasser may have been a *smidge* jealous that another actress was getting to have all the fun (and glory) playing a part she essentially created while she had to watch Beverlee have all the divalicious lines and wardrobe on her own show. Don't get me wrong, Rachel remained a wonderful character, but she took a decidedly respectable Victoria Lord turn in character, except none of the crazy fun outlandish outlets in the alters (until Justine of course, and we all know how that turned out).

I once asked a soap columnist if he thought that Strasser would have achieved "Lucci-dom" had she stuck with AW. But he reminded me that Harding Lemay had this idea of "reforming" Rachel by making some of her dreams come true even when Strasser was still in the role. He was also happy to have Victoria Wyndham onboard because he felt that she was a more capable actress, better at conveying the black, white, and shades of grey of his Rachel that he was preparing to explore. So in or out of the part, Rachel was going to make this change because Lemay wanted to move his creation, Iris into the villainess position. It was brilliant writing really. And it's even more curious knowing that years later Strasser was a breath away from replacing McKinsey as Alex on GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victoria Wyndham said that Lemay and Rauch wanted her because they wanted someone who they knew could take Rachel into a more diverse direction. She said Robin wanted to play the bitch, and played it very well. But when time came up for a recast, Lemay of course wanted to steer the character in another direction. Robin herself has said that she's not very good at doing gray characters, which is why she was very unhappy with her role on AMC. She said she can play black or white, but gray isn't her forte.

Was Robin on AW when Mac and Iris were created? I thought she left before Lemay created those characters. Even though I wasn't alive during the 70's, I'm sure it would've been great fun to see Strasser and McKinsey together, even though Wyndham and McKinsey were apparently very good together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There only seems to be the Summer 1968 two wedding episodes when Agnes was just finishing writing and Alice meets Steve Frame for the first time that have a very young, very gorgeous Rachel in the role--in existance among any collectors. I've never heard of any other episodes coming to light at all--and these aren't on youtube--yet (they're very low quality)

And no Robin left before Mac and Iris (by quite a few years I think--wasn't Mac around the time Steve left??). SHe left at first in 69 or 70 to persue stage acting--but then when her replacement didn't work out she returned for a few months as a favour while they foudn a good recast--so I'm not sure she woulda been recast if she hadn't left on her own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason i brought this up i just watched 50 years of soap operas on youtube, and she speaks of her time as Rachel Davis-Matthews and she then talks of Vicky Wydham in the role, how they both took turns as Rachel trying to destroy Alice and Steve relationship. I would have loved to seen Robin playing Rachel to Beverlee's Iris. I was around to see Beverlee's Iris, I was born in 1987 so i only got to see Carmen Duncan's go as Iris. Robin is an amazing actress and I think playing redeem Rachel would have not worked for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason i brought this up i just watched 50 years of soap operas on youtube, and she speaks of her time as Rachel Davis-Matthews and she then talks of Vicky Wydham in the role, how they both took turns as Rachel trying to destroy Alice and Steve relationship. I would have loved to seen Robin playing Rachel to Beverlee's Iris. I was around to see Beverlee's Iris, I was born in 1987 so i only got to see Carmen Duncan's go as Iris. Robin is an amazing actress and I think playing redeem Rachel would have not worked for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lemay wrote for Strasser's Rachel if only for months. We must remember that when he joined AW in '71, he had inherited the s/ls of the HWs prior to him. He took what he had and created the legendary Rachel/Mac/Iris triangle. He commented on Strasser vs. Wyndham in his infamous SOD interview, he spoke to the ladies' strengths/weaknesses. Margie Impert played Rachel in '71 as well, so he wrote for her too, along with Robin during her brief return before vacating the role for good.

Vicki has said that she didn't want to take on Rachel initially b/c she had recently wrapped a similar role, Charlotte Bauer on GL. What intrigued her was the fact the Rachel would make the metamorphosis that Lemay planned for her.

I have in my collection that bit of kinescoped Robin Strasser as Rachel footage, and Lord how I wish I had more! She is so fun to watch, she is a fan's actress, she "winks" to us the audience in the subtlest of ways. You can just see the wheels turning as she encounters this glamorous Steve Frame character who has everything Russ has but oh so more. I. LOVE. ROBIN. STRASSER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I LOVED Robin Strasser as Rachel. The Rachel/Steve/Alice triangle was the first "must-see" soap action I knew of. I hated the direction that Victoria Wyndham took the character in. The RS version of Rachel would NEVER have become a matriarch. I've never seen Robin as Dorian, but I know she was FANTASTIC as Rachel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Strasser was great as Rachel Davis the bitch. I think she would have been mediocre and personally and professionally unfilled as Rachel Cory the matriarch and I think she would have left the show by the mid 80s and tried to get another bitch type character on another soap.

Victoria Wyndham was just pitch perfect for the new direction Rachel was taken in. She had a dignity and a stability about her that was just wonderful. She also had great chemistry with Doug Watson, I believed they loved each other. If Strasser had been there...I just don't think I'd have bought the relationship as being genuine. She plays her characters in a predatory fashion. I also don't think she could have pulled off the relationship between Carmen Duncan's Iris (who I just loved, that accent, hot damn)...that was a strained relationship to play...I think Strasser's acting would have been to 'in your face' with Duncan's Iris. It would have been battle of the divas which was the exact opposite of that narrative. Finally, for much of the 90s Rachel was a supporting character in a lot of ways. Linda Dano got the alcohol story (for which she won a well deserved Emmy), Anna Stuart got the May/December romance (which was undeservedly cut short) and Jensen Buchanan got the rest. And after Carmen Duncan left the show there was basically nothing for Rachel Cory to be involved in, hence the Justine ridiculousness. Strasser wouldn't have tolerated it, I love her but patient she isn't.

That said, Victoria Wyndham never could have played Dorian Lord. Ever. Not for a second. Ever. So it goes to show that back in the 70s and 80s wonderful casting directors existed and they saw potential and they went for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This shames me to say but... I never really liked Wyndham as Rachel--even in those GREAT Lemay clips there's something about her style of acting--I know he claims she was less mannered than Strasser but I find it very mannered. Maybe it was that weird interview with her that's just colouring my judgement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Judging by what Lemay said of Strasser, I think he would've absolutely hated Carmen Duncan's Iris as well. Duncan could be outrageously over the top and heavy, like Strasser at times. Beverlee Mckinsey (the definitive Iris of course) had a more natural, nuanced, and subtle approach that could break your heart one minute and make you want to slap her across the face the next. I found Duncan to be extremely "one note" as Iris, which was how Lemay described Strasser's Rachel. I know when Lemay returned to AW in 88 or 89, one of the big things in his long-term bible was Iris' return, which the overrated and dull Donna Swajeski penned (it's said she used most of Lemay's bible during her years at AW). Of course at that point McKinsey was on GL stirring up trouble and playing another diva, Alexandra Spaulding, so they had to recast with Duncan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy