Jump to content

September 15-19, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Don't be a jackass, SageyBob. And I know that's a difficult request for you. The only names I post under are ivnkplng (here, at GLMP, and on the yuku boards) and gllover (at PGP). Unlike you, my online goal is not to create distress for other posters, but rather to share in an appreciation of soap opera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But to lose 300,000 viewers in a single week?! That's atrocious!

And I haven't been finding Y&R mediocre, I've been finding it quite enjoyable...is it Bill Bell? No. Is it Kay Alden at her peak? No. Is it on par with what Jack Smith was doing or better, I think so. I'm surprised and I bet MAB and HS and PR are too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Latham was terrible

This is precisely what I'm saying. First she totally harmed it, alienated a lot of extremely patient and faithful viewers, and then it took too long for something interesting to be set in motion. But once that happened, the writing could not sustain it.

It is still suffering from the same old things: lack of strong vision, mediocre material, behind-the-scenes mess, corporate control of the soap, weird writers hirings/firings etc. One gigantic mess.

Which is what happened. And those viewers won't come back. Y&R is probably the only soap that could regain lost viewers, but not anymore. 

Oh, I was referring to Victor's depression and Heather's condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And for this same week, here is how the telenovelas fared on Univision:

MONDAY

Querida enemiga (7-8 P;): 1.7/3 (1.2), 2.0/3 (1.5)

Al diablo con los guapos (8–9 PM): 2.6/4 (2.1), 2.8/4 (2.4)

Fuego en la sangre (9–10 PM): 2.5/4 (2.1), 2.6/4 (2.2)

TUESDAY

Querida enemiga: 1.8/3 (1.3), 2.0/4 (1.6)

Al diablo con los guapos: 2.7/4 (2.4), 3.0/5 (2.9)

Fuego en la sangre: 2.6/4 (2.5), 2.4/4 (2.2)

WEDNESDAY

Querida enemiga: 1.7/3 (1.2), 1.9/4 (1.5)

Al diablo con los guapos: 2.6/4 (2.3), 2.8/5 (2.6)

Fuego en la sangre: 2.4/4 (2.2), 2.3/4 (2.1)

THURSDAY

Querida enemiga: 1.6/3 (1.3), 1.9/4 (1.6)

Al diablo con los guapos: 2.7/5 (2.5), 2.9/5 (2.8)

FRIDAY:

Querida enemiga: 1.7/4 (1.2), 2.0/4 (1.6)

Al diablo con los guapos: 2.7/5 (2.8), 3.0/5 (2.9)

Household ratings/shares (18–49)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here are the top ad spenders with changes in brackets:

  1. Procter & Gamble (-4.33%)
  2. General Motors (4.87%)
  3. AT&T (-5.75%)
  4. Verizon Communications (3.65%)
  5. Johnson & Johnson (-5.62%
  6. PepsiCo (9.12%)
  7. Time Warner Inc. (-8.83%)
  8. Toyota Motor (7.38%)
  9. Ford Motor (-30.56%)
  10. Kraft Foods (-10.36%)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if this is what you were saying or not, but just to clarify, I do not propose a spinoff of current soaps at all. I do not think there should be a spinoff of a current soap. The only thing that I would even give an ounce of a chance is if a popular character moved and popped up on a show. I don't even think that would work. I don't think Night shift will work in any fashion because it is a spinoff and is essentially the same thing as the daytime version. I think putting Night Shift on the network would be a big problem because the production quality is so very bad. If they would spend a little money before shooting it back to daytime, it might be a good ida.

I don't know if putting something on a popular existing evening show would work or not. My thoughts is in the current environment, you have to do something that makes people who work all day or who go to school take enough interest in a story that they would bother to turn on their DVRs to see if they like it. I didn't know that Texas spun off of a night time show. I thought, for some reason, that it was a spin off of Another World. PC was a spinoff of GH. Did it spin off of a nighttime show too?

I think Jon Robin Baltz is brilliant too. You idea would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wholeheartedly agree. Any and all of my ideas for a new soap are based on the assumption that the current shows should no longer exist. It's like a scifi show where a character time travels at some point another character says "You shouldn't be here. Your presence here has destroyed everything!" That's how I feel about the current soaps. Most of them should have one off the air years ago and new shows should've filled those vacancies. Instead we have ReRon taking a serious, groundbreaking, REALITY-BASED story and turning it to typical soap pablum. He's taken the work of a far more talented writer and sacrificed it to his fantasy of what it would be like when he was finally in charge.

Imo, OLTL should have gone off the air after the end of the first Malone regime. (Although I can't help but notice how easily that version of Todd, Marty and Nora would fit into an episode of Law & Order: SVU.) And been replaced by a show focusing on the Gannons, Vegas, Bo, Nora, etc... until that didn't work anymore. Then it should have been replaced by something else and so on.

Instead the audience is forced to endure the equivalent of sitting at Thanksgiving dinner while Uncle Ron retells the story of his gallbladder surgery for the one hundredth time with a mouth full of cottage cheese If these shows had been allowed to run their course and replaced, maybe primetime wouldn't be the only place to find good soap these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the way to her own engagement party? I've read that the show had trouble getting the audience to sympathize with Rita, but...that seems bizarre. Maybe I can understand the issue with the censors, given that at the time, rape wasn't depicted the way it is now, and marital rape was even less acknowledged.  Wasn't Chris Brooks' rape one of the first honest stories on the subject? I just don't think I could get into a show I didn't have a working knowledge of. I know it's a different era, but I really tried to get into GH once Maura West joined, but it just never jelled.
    • Yes it was! My mom and I convinced my dad to get one. He was--how shall I put this?--on the thrifty side, but one day he came home with one as a surprise. To this day, I'm convinced it fell off a truck. (He knew people with "connections."

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) BUT, we had our VCR and we could watch our soaps. That thing lasted forever! It was built like a tank. Even when we got new ones with more features, we kept that one.
    • Please register in order to view this content

        Blasphemy!  (Haha, I get it.  But, you should try watching AMC! 80s-90s was so good.)
    • I thought about saying how I resented the fact that those two newbies were tripping up the Puppetmaster of all Puppetmasters, when the best others could do was a stalemate (or less...). But, well...*sigh*
    • I read years ago that both Zaslow and Lenore both complained that it came off as a seduction because of CBS censors, so Lenore asked if she could say, "you raped me" to leave no doubt with the audience, and that Zaslow insisted that Holly's rape played realistically 
    • Wow it’s official, Gatwa is out… https://www.avclub.com/ncuti-gatwa-addresses-doctor-who-finale-statement DW fandom on Reddit is in a furor over how things went down and apparent last minute scrapping of the original ending. Also…Billie Piper again really?
    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy