Jump to content

OLTL: Has anyone else given up watching this show?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't understand all the ratings talk. MarkH has shown that ratings have been relatively stable. More than most soaps. If you're looking for them to JUMP, they won't... none are. All these (stable) ratings mean is that for every viewer that is tuning OUT of OLTL for not enjoying it, there are just as many fans either staying tuned in or BECOMING fans to balance out whoever is not watching anymore. So in my book, Carlivati is doing fine for ratings.

Removing the ratings from the KAnder/Toups discussion, it really is one person enjoying it, and one person not. So oh well.

I love this post from rhinohide:

That, I think, should be the spirit of the message board. Not this one, all message boards.

As for Todd/Marty, I love what DrewH outlined:

The slow build makes this story work for me, and the only reason it's WORKING for me, and many others from what I read, is that we have faith that it will come to a conclusion, a payoff, that somewhere involves Todd losing everything. From the people I see hating it, ZendallFan, etc, they say that DON'T have faith it will end that way. So it's really all about faith. Faith the writer won't fail you in the end. If you don't have faith, I consider that not Carlivati's fault, but the genre's fault, for failing you too many times, under the pens of too many writers. For me, Carlivati's work has satisfied me MORE than failed me, so that's why I don't crucify him.

The soap genre allows for nuances, smaller details, subtleties, that will strengthen the ultimate payoff. I remember the awkwardness of Todd waking up next to Marty the night of the storm when she didn't want to be in the room alone. I remember the several times that Cole was in the house and had no idea that his mother was alive and upstairs. All of those details will heighten the drama WHEN Marty gets her memory back and realizes the monstrosity of Todd's actions. Carlivati isn't blind to these things when he HAS Soap Opera Digest doing interviews and articles with him asking "how far will they go?" and telling him about the OLTL fans who don't like the direction of the story. His responses only explain WHY they are doing the story, not telling us that Todd/Marty are being groomed as supercouple of the future. He's not saying the end result because he wants people tuning in for the climax, he wants people unsure. But I have faith that the climax will satisfy me in SOME kind of way. And I can say that I have never felt more connected and INVESTED in OLTL storylines since the early/mid 90s.

It seems a lot of the other dissatisfied OLTL fans keep talking about how Carlivati was praised too soon as the second coming, etc, but THAT shouldn't be informing your determination to make us realize we're wrong for enjoying the stories we are right now. I am enjoying right now, overall, but I certainly wasn't one comparing Carlivati to Douglas Marland, or whoever else, because I focus on what this ONE person is doing at this ONE soap, RIGHT NOW. Every writer is different, has different consistency of talent, for different lengths of times, in combination with different soap canvases and behind-the-scenes regimes, so comparing this one to that one is like apples and oranges to me.

I also said I'm not glued to the show like I was for BE takeover and Nash's death. But it has to do with many reasons... where the focus is (more on Rex/Gigi than the Buchanans, Viki/Charlie, Dorian like it was during the BE Takeover story), current story direction (Brody losing it, when there could have been so much more), Fall Promos (editing a caption about "complicated love" in with a shot of Todd and Marty)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the last 10 years of OLTL have encouraged people to believe that tptb cater to particular interest. They've catered to couples, story lines, and characters that were said to be popular and in the fans minds- they have always appeared interested in giving the fans what they want, and have used fan response to pen many stories, and usher out actors. IN many ways Frons has "trained" viewers into believing that if they (majority) write letters and campaign for couples in polls, they will receive a "treat". In deterring from that climate I think the show has left many unsettled and this is the result. Tptb lack of commitment to characters , story lines, and romance in the past pissed many of us off- and now that I see the so called majority not trumping tptb, it's rather confusing. I feel, as of late, I'm in for another Bron Frons' training in "are you not entertained"(picturing Russell Crowe in Gladiator).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mercy! Someone gets it!

Can I say that I love this post. so perfect!!! Pure perfection :). A measured response, positive and negatives, taking into account multiple perspectives, AND analyzing where the distrust comes from. I'm gonna frame this one :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like there's no point in getting rid of him now. He's done his damage. This Todd/Marty thing has actually "broken" the show for me in a way that I can't ever see myself returning. Ron pissed all over the 20 years I watched the show. I used to say I could go back to watching if certain things happened but, there's no point. JMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is the most ridiculous topic I have ever... <_<

What exactly is the point, again? To rally for Ron Carlivati's firing... because, why? He had an off summer? Or to just basically knight RC as the last "hack" in the line of hacks who will eventually be accused of being ghost written as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

David well said--I admit i've been hard on OLTL the past while--but that's why I come to a site like this--to complain about what i don't like, praise what I do, to read other opiniosn and to *discuss*. I do agree with you actually that--all things considered, this is the most connected to OLTL I've felt since 1995 probably--something I didn't realize (there have been brief periods I've prefered--the first month the Labines returned, the Storm of Change under Griffith, etc but nothing lasting more than a few months). I never quite get how these threads become so personal--it's easy to argue these things, or should be, without making them about "well your opinion sucks", yet that's something I know I can be guilty of too.

Anyway I think there are a few obvious things--even the people clamoring for his firing don't seem to have AY ideas about who they'd want to replace him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excuse you, but it is NOT closed minded. First of all, I didn't enjoy his drawn out 1968 storyline, but the heart was there and the best of intentions was there. What's closed minded is "Oooh, I don't like this storyline so, guess what -- HE'S A HACK!" This man has attempted to bring a freshness to a show that has been stale for the last decade. Okay, so he failed. Not every single storyline comes out the way it was pitched -- or at least the way it was pictured when it was pitched. The whole Marty/Todd storyline is disturbing, true, but it's at least a way to mine story from two characters who are steeped in history.

And, for the last damned time, I am sick and tired... SICK AND TIRED... of these people getting pissy all because their opinions are disagreed with. YOU suck it up. Look into who you are as a so-called fan of the show and the genre in general and find out why you are so quick to piss and moan about why this person is supposed to be called a HACK (at the words of one of the most biased soap viewers on this board who wouldn't know what the word "impartial" means if it bit them in the face, ass and any other part of the anatomy) all because his attempt at doing something different didn't pan out. OLTL has been in a rather questionable state for the last several years. When a writer is trying to make his or her show stand out and be relevant, there are going to be hits and misses.

I am not saying Ron Carlivati's storytelling is anywhere near historic. I don't think he's the savior of soaps. But I do think, however, that it is absolutely ridiculous to consider someone who was brought on staff and has been a writer through several regimes over the last 11 years a "hack." He has an understanding of these characters. He has been through a decade of story with these characters. He was tutored, if you will, under Claire Labine. Is she a hack because she taught a hack? Come the hell on. Quit bitching and complaining about someone being a hack the minute there's a lag in story.

You want to talk about sucking things up? Suck up 1968 and Mendorra. It's over and done with. As for the Marty/Todd storyline -- IT HASN'T BEEN RESOLVED YET! How the HELL can anybody determine exactly how horrible this story is until it's over and done with? We have not yet seen the payoff. We have not yet seen how ANY of the characters involved will react.

I waded through eight pages of this thread and saw nothing that swayed me to think that this show needs to be given up on and Ron Carlivati needs to be called a hack. I stand in my opinion that this is just a thread developed because RC's story has pissed someone off, and now we have to be subjected to "hack, hack, hack, fire the hack" crap -- yet again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't post here very much anymore, but I say you have very bluntly put into words what I was thinking!

Yes, disgruntled viewers have the right to express what's bugging them, but to call for the firing of a writer this quickly? Over a story that hasn't been resolved because the writer DARES to take a chance? I enjoy OLTL, even if some of this stuff squinks me out, because it's DIFFERENT than what Days has been offering. I will admit, I haven't gotten into the other soaps, but dang.

I will admit that I'm soured on "Fire him! Fire him!" because, shoot, I hear that on Days boards every time someone gets pissed off. Man, if everyone got fired for having down slumps, the job market would be in a heck of a lot worse shape than it is now.

More to the point: what's the morale backstage? How do the actors feel? Is ES going to take a stand against RC like she did DH? Maybe THEN would be the time to consider firing him, but ya know...I haven't seen her do that just yet.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • To me, that made no difference. The point stands whether Eva wants to be a Dupree or not. Anita was 110% on top of things. Also it's a logical inference that Eva might be interested in having a place in her supposedly real family. Frankly though I wonder if Eva knows how to feel ... yet. She could really be confused.
    • Does Jack ever dress in drag during that early '00s period where he was trying to get Jennifer back...or does he just fake being gay around then?
    • Here you go, by special request! https://www.instagram.com/p/DJlXDnWJImW/ DAYS 9-26-90 Matt Ashford as Jack Deveraux in drag
    • Concluding 1976... Raymond Schafer arrives in Springfield and begins an extensive probe into Malcolm’s death, puzzling Ed, who wonders why most of Schafer’s question sessions keep turning back to Rita’s involvement with Malcolm. Ed assures the man that Rita’s only connection with Malcolm was as his nurse; he is unaware that Schafer knows a great deal more about Rita than he does. Just to protect Rita, Ed has Mike check on Schafer’s credentials, and learns that he’s a  well-respected criminal attorney. The waitress at the restaurant where Malcolm suffered his stroke tells Schafer that the woman who was with him reacted very professionally to the sudden emergency, as if she were a nurse. Realizing that her little sister has fallen hard for Tim, Rita warns him that she’s very vulnerable and innocent, but Tim tells Rita her advice isn’t necessary. But Tim then receives a plum job offer to be chief neurological resident at a prestigious Philadelphia hospital and can’t pass up the opportunity. Evie is crushed by the news and spends the next several days at home crying. Joe Werner, fully recovered, has accepted a post as a medical aide in a destitute village in India and leaves alone, with Sarah to follow him later. Justin asks Sarah to consider a partnership with him in private practice, but she explains that she thrives on the hospital atmosphere. When a call comes from India that Joe has had another massive attack, Sarah leaves on the next available flight and arrives only moments before he dies. The painful news is relayed back to Cedars at once. Sara returns from India a heartbroken woman, but the day-to-day involvement of raising T.J. and of her career seem to be her salvation. Justin shows a surprisingly compassionate and understanding side to Sara, but, ironically, Justin’s ex-wife, Jackie, arrives in Springfield with her diabetic father, who is suffering from a heart attack. In the process of consulting with Justin on her father’s condition, Jackie comes face to face with Sara for the first time since their college days. Evie’s heartbreak at Tim’s departure turns to fury and hatred when she inadvertently discovers a letter which Tim wrote to Rita just after he left. In it he concedes that Rita was right about Evie’s vulnerability where he was concerned but reminds Rita that he badly hurt her in the same way she feared Evie would suffer. Evie is now sure that Rita somehow forced Tim to leave town and is livid at the idea that Tim was Rita’s lover. She insists she’s cutting off her relationship with Rita and will pay her back for any help she’s received in the past. Ben and Hope’s wedding plans are off, as Ben, while still insisting he’s innocent, won’t explain why the robbery evidence points to him. Hope feels his unwillingness to tell her the truth makes marriage to him impossible, but confides to Ann that she is miserable without him. Ben has echoed these sentiments to Mike but won’t confide in him, either as Hope’s father or as an attorney.   Holly is trying very hard to build a life without Ed, but since she sees him virtually every day at work,she’s unable to put him out of her mind. She accepts a date with a member of the hospital administration staff but is unable to avoid making comparisons between Ed and this young man and winds up alone, sadly holding Ed’s picture and recalling how much she loves him. Believing that the hospital board’s conclusions on Grainger’s death have settled the question once and for all, Rita has regained her self-confidence, and her romance with Ed is growing daily. They admit their love for each other, and Ed confides that he intentionally  held back with Rita for fear of making another mistake. Rita then tells Ed she has never married because for her marriage must be forever. Rita’s mother realizes that Rita is truly in love when she confides in her that she doesn’t understand why she’s been so lucky in having him love her and how she wants to be the very best person she can be for him. Ed proposes marriage to Rita and gives her time to think about it before answering. Rita painfully realizes that her past could, if it rose again against her, make a life with Ed a lost dream. But Raymond Shaefer has been quietly but efficiently carrying on his investigation and has learned that Grainger argued with Rita at her apartment. He presents the evidence he’s compiled to District Attorney Eric Van Gelder, who decides the case warrants further investigation. Rita goes to Ed’s office to tell him she loves him but can’t marry him, that she doesn’t deserve him and “can’t do it to him.” As she turns from a confused Ed to leave, she finds the district attorney and a police officer outside Ed’s door, waiting to arrest her. Ed, insisting that a serious mistake has been made, calls Mike to help her as Rita, shocked and humiliated, is taken under arrest through the hallways of the hospital in which she works. Mike manages Rita’s release on bail only after she has had to submit to the degrading booking procedure. Mike sees her alone at her apartment, explaining he can help her only if she tells him the whole truth. Rita equivocates until Mike mentions Texas, indicating to Rita that he knows at least some of the story. Van Gelder has, in fact, let Mike see the bulk of evidence in the case against Rita, to convince him her arrest wasn’t a capricious whim. Rita explains to Mike that Malcolm believed she intentionally vilified him to his father, to do him out of his rightful inheritance, and then wanted his father dead to collect her money. Mike expresses his appreciation of Rita’s honesty, promising to help her. But Rita’s tormented dreams confirm that she hasn’t yet told all the truth, and after Peggy visits, expressing firm support, Rita tells Roger she has to reveal his part in the story. Roger painfully tells Rita about his being Christina’s father to show her that if Ed knew, it would end Rita’s chances with him forever. Rita, who was ready to tell Ed the whole story, now realizes how risky that would be. Adding to Rita’s pain is her forced leave of absence from the hospital until she’s cleared and the embarrassment of seeing her name in the headlines.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Yes, but the stories are all pretty awful Seeing Victor rehashing his hatred of the Abbotts  when he married one of them and has a daughter that is half Abbott as well as walking around with Traci's daughter's heart keeping him alive makes him look worse than he already is. And I remember he and Jack chatting amicably in the past few years. Victor interfering in Kyle/Claire is just repeat of Billy/Victoria. Sharon, Nick,Phyllis etc are around but again the stories are lacking.
    • I think Kevin's 1996 Emmy was fair enough. He barely appeared for his second. I don't think anyone else on the list is that deserving but I might have gone with Moore as he did try with the whole Keesha AIDS story. @alwaysAMC Thanks to slick jones' cast list I was able to see that Nikki Rene played Tina. Not much on her, as you mentioned. Tap and a few Broadway listings (it doesn't help that a younger actress with a similar name is in a lot of roles). Nikki Rene: Credits, Bio, News & More | Broadway World https://onceonthisisland.fandom.com/wiki/Nikki_Rene Nikki Rene - IMDb
    • Thank you. That does ring a bell. I remember Theresa and Julian's drunk, giggly fake wedding (with Julian asking "Whassup?" to the minister). Was Bruce tricking the pair as a prank, or did somebody put him up to it? I especially liked Katherine recalling how dashing young Alistair was when he'd pick up Rachel for dates, and how she wished she could be her sister, then feeling guilty once Rachel had her boating accident ...
    • And Kevin Mambo beat Shemar Moore for those two Emmys. I chalk up the wins to the voters not wanting Jonathan Jackson to eventually end up with a five peat (he won 1995, 1998, 1999). These were the 1996 and 1997 Younger Actor races. 1996: Nathan Fillion, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow 1997: Steve Burton, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy