Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Like @Chris B said, theirs was a storyline that, in part, was supposed to explain how Abby became Abby.  The thing is, did we really NEED another explanation for how Abby became Abby?  Abby was Sid's kid sister, who'd had enough of being the submissive, suburban mom to Jeff, always clipping coupons and rushing the kids off to this recital or that after-school game practice, so she decided to go after money and power in the male-dominated corporate world instead.  AFAIC, you don't need more explanation than that, lol.

It's obvious KL wanted to exploit Peter Reckell's popularity with DAYS fans (same went for FC and Kristian Alfonso) without knowing exactly what they wanted to do with him.

Yep, I could see that going down in the coffee shop that Karen and Val would've opened in '95, lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Peter Reckell was doomed with a terrible character. He did have strong chemistry with Nicollette Sheridan but there was nothing he could do to make that role work. Maybe if the Sumner Group was around they could've made it work but there was no long term potential for a conman when he joined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup. Popular daytime star from a show popular with a younger audience brought on to aging primetime soap with the expectation that their huge daytime following would carry over.

Notice how most of the former daytime actors/actresses that were on the CBS primetime soaps were from ABC/NBC. CBS had so much of their own daytime talent they could have used on their primetime soaps but for whatever reason that didn't happen and I think demographics played a part in that (CBS daytime skewing older than ABC/NBC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  I'm hard-pressed to come up with CBSD actors from that era who had the same kind of appeal with younger audiences that ABCD and NBCD actors had.  I mean, who, on CBSD, was as big with young viewers as Genie Francis and Tony Geary, or Kristian Alfonso and Peter Reckell, were (and who hadn't already gone onto films, like Meg Ryan; or had had their own series, like David Hasselhoff)?

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's odd, because looking aside from casting, the concept doesn't quite work. So Abby became Abby because she met this rich guy once, had her heart broken and then just marries Jeff and lives a boring suburban life? Huh? If anything, you'd think Abby's killer instinct would've kicked in sooner. I actually prefer the simple version of Abby being middle class, hating it and grabbed the first best chance to escape it.

If anything, I think Olivia's storyline in season 11 was meant to be an Abby: Origins story until they nixed it. 

Edited by te.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ICAM!!

If the show was hurting for story for Abby, they could've had her deal with something like breast cancer.  Donna Mills was never greater as Abby than when she had to deal with something that was real and out of her control, like with Diana's kidney failure or Olivia's drug addiction.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  KL suffered from her departure - just as it had from the departures of Julie Harris, Lisa Hartman, Constance McCashin and Douglas Sheehan - but Abby crossed the line, IMO, when she set up Harold and basically let Ted Melcher get away with murder.  In times past, Abby wouldn't have wanted to see anyone hurt like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Knots Landing was effectively over with Abby departure.

The final five seasons were a chore to get through. I feel the final four seasons happened because CBS was in their third place primetime mess era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Abby getting back involved with Greg had potential, but it also felt like it was happening a couple years too late and seemed like it didn’t play out as planned. That final story with Ted Melcher was bizarre and out of character for Abby. We even got a red herring scene of Ted potentially killing Abby before she called his bluff and left town, a bit with her tail between her legs though. Still left Paige in danger though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It probably didn't.  From what I have heard and read over the years, the Lechowicks often had to change course on their stories.  Apparently, they couldn't figure out that what plays well "on paper" doesn't always play as well on the screen.  Plus, unlike other writer/producers on KL, they never consulted with the cast, who knew their characters better than anyone, nor welcomed any of their input.

And it was, for lack of a better word, easier to keep on a show that still had some audience - even if most viewers had abandoned it years before - than to try and launch a brand-new show at a time when your network is literally fighting for its' life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She wouldn't have let Ted get away with murder...she would have used that scene to set him up to be caught by the police.

I did like how worked up Karen got because she couldn't get Abby in trouble for the Murakme scheme. 

That story I could buy for Abby because she always resented Karen and Gary being involved in Lotus Point.  She saw the Manny scandal as a perfect chance to get that land back from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That's a lovely writeup. Do fans feel it was warranted?
    • So I was reminded that we're now meant to be celebrating PRIDE by this amazing post:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • RIP to our hero, John Black 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I really wonder why they chose to write this whole ‘John is getting better’ part of the storyline, especially since we all knew what was really going to happen. And I hope we find out the answer someday. But as tough and as tearjerking as today was, it was also really beautiful. And the acting, even though a lot of it if not all of it was real, was spectacular. The flashbacks were beautiful too. I honestly can’t even describe how much I enjoyed today.  Having so many of John and Marlena’s scenes be focused on the two of them and their love story was the right decision. It was a fitting end to John and Marlena. And I’m also glad that John and Steve got to have one last goodbye after everything that happened. As for Bo and Hope and their family, I did think that some parts were a little unnecessary but I really enjoyed Bo’s dream and his reunion with Zack. The acting playing Zack actually did a pretty good job too. Everybody encouraging Bo to fight was really the right decision in this storyline as well.  As for the final minutes of today, be prepared. I actually have tears running down my cheeks as I write this. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Bye, Daphne... not gonna miss you.   
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I still continue to think that Dani is written like she's been in a soap opera for 20 seasons and she's come to a point where she's completely spent storyline wise. It's a vibe I'm getting. Characterization wise... It's like she is either incredibly stupid... or just plain delusional and out of touch with reality. I choose to pick the second option. Also... to me... she has not been entertaining for months now. Ever since they decided to jump straight to... she's an alcoholic... which we didn't need at this point... the character has struggled. Her initial Ex-wife-from-hell bravado was more interesting, even though cliche.  I expect her to improve in the coming months... they used her as a clown type of character to draw in views. Now I need to see the human being. If there is one, behind the soap opera caricature.   
    • A full 1973 episode that looks fantastic in color.
    • It 's obviously cheaper to go the true crime route. Having different reporters and production teams covering a variety of topics costs more. The networks are delivering budget programming these days.
    • Maybe because 60 Minutes has kept the same formula for almost 57 years? Usually, there is more than one interview/topic discussed, like a real magazine. Dateline, 20/20, and so many others have all fallen to the one-subject formula: True crime. I mean, I'm a Forensic Files junkie and loved original America's Most Wanted back in the day, but even I think the TV market has been over-saturated with all crime, all the time. There was still that element when these shows began, but they were a segment of an episode, not the entire episode. Maybe the audience is just getting bored with such a fixed formula. If stories were intermixed with crime, some feel-good segment, and maybe something to do with lifestyle/music/and yes, as much as I have come to hate it, political issues, maybe these shows could rally. As they are - again, minus 60 Minutes - they have become tired and predictable.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy