Jump to content

Y&R: TV Guide Confirms JG is out and his replacement!


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Yes, GL and SB share Jill Farren Phelps, Rauch, and Conboy as common EP's. Conboy's mismanagement of GL's budget is almost single-handedly responsible for all the trouble GL is in right now.

I think Conboy's in his 80's, and of course things didn't end on a happy note between William J. Bell and Conboy.

I heard Texas was originally intended to be a period soap, but NBC and P&G had it revamped to cash in on the Dallas craze that was sweeping the nation at that point. Interesting to note that Beverlee McKinsey adored Rauch, while she couldn't stand Phelps. Rauch and Phelps are probably the two most controversial soap opera EP's ever.

  • Replies 257
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

It aired here in Croatia few years ago. I didn't watch it, but the little I saw was AMAZING production wise! I didn't know Rauch was the producer! Wow!

  • Members
Posted

For one thing, wasting over a million dollars on that baseball set that was used ONCE. I can't even begin to imagine all those actors who got fired or pushed to recurring for that alone. He didn't like the sets GL had, he wanted to "beautify" them, that he did, and in the process spent GL's budget like it was water.

At least Rauch kept his promise regarding Maureen Garrett and Jerry Ver Dorn. He didn't fire or bump them recurring. Poor Garrett was bumped to recurring almost as soon as Rauch left.

And GL was not really in bad shape when Rauch left, Taggart and Culliton were doing a fine job as HW's, IMO. That was probably the last time GL felt a bit like itself.

  • Members
Posted

GL was in relatively good shape when Rauch left. He wasn't GL's problem, he saved that show from cancellation in '97 and totally revitalized it. He got Joan Collins on board in '02 and kept things going. He was pretty good at GL.

Sylph, thanks for letting us know Lee Phillip Bell's age, I've always wondered how old she is. I think she keeps herself out of Y&R aside from signing a few cheques and papers each year. She goes to the Bel Air country club, the Church of the Good Shepherd, Neiman Marcus, On Sunset, the Polo Lounge, Malibu on the weekends: it's a nice life.

And if what i'm seeing onscreen screams of Sheffer, well scream Hogan scream.

  • Members
Posted

Somethings looked better under Conboy but alot of the sets looked worse IMO. While Rauch overlit everything, Conboy went too far the other way and made everything too dark with alot of episodes set at night with dim lighting in every shot. There were whole episodes where you could barely see the actor's faces. Wheeler continued the two-lightbulbs-and-a-flashlight tradition that Conboy started until that got too expensive and they switched over to using the Tickertoy cameras outside in the sunlight every freaking day.

  • Members
Posted

They won't let Raunch mess up Y&R creatively. Maybe experiment... but nothing definite if it sucks.

With that aside...

I'm loving Y&R lately. It seems to be going places, and it's the only show I keep up with now. I'm done with the other soaps, and even if Y&R gets bad again, then I'll just tune in sporadically - but I will not be dedicating my time to another soap again. PERIOD Maybe a little YouTube here and there to check out a "solid performance" but that's about it. OLTL seriously burned me.

  • Members
Posted

I like the show but it is way too much Newman. Everyday, the same characters are on. The ratings took a serious slide earlier this year when we saw the same stories and the same characters week after week. There is more to the core than the Newmans. It looks like the Newmans, revitalized Abbotts and Chancellors are being pushed. I like that but let's not forget about other core characters who have paid their dues and are fan favorites but don't happen to be part of those three families.

  • Members
Posted

I’ve always been curious about the baseball set. Some say it was very expensive others says it wasn’t because the show recycled older sets to incorporate into the baseball field. However, I find it really hard to believe the set cost one million dollars. At that point, I would assume it would be cheaper to shoot on location or am I wrong?

I don’t think Conboy was as wasteful as people claim. I suspect that Raunch would’ve had to make similar cast cuts had he stayed. I know Kim Zimmer made it very clear during the big contract debate in 2005 that she had already negotiated and taken a cut under John Conboy. Zimmer doesn’t seem like the kind of person who would take a cut if she felt the money was being spent elsewhere. Also, this was around the time of the baseball storyline.

To be honest, I didn’t like a lot of Culliton and Taggert’s work before Conboy came in, but I also wasn’t watching consistently. I remember taping the first appearance of Joan Collins to see if the show had improved any and ended up fast forwarding through the entire episode other than Alexandra’s scenes. I didn’t like Ben and Marina or Beth and Bill. I couldn’t understand how Taggert could defend the Tony and Marah pairing or having a poor widow stripping for a mob boss to pay off her death be a prelude to romance. I thought the custody battle for Zack was poorly done as Phillip became a complete jack***, Harley was a fool, and I couldn’t stand Gus and Harley as a couple. For me, Eden was a bore until Weston made her a hooker. The only storyline that was good was Olivia-Phillip-Alan triangle and the business aspect of Spaulding. I don’t even want to talk about the awful Santa Clause pushes Danny and Cassie together scenes. Ratings wise, GL had been fairly low for years and when Raunch left the ratings were low, I don’t think that was leaving the show in good shape.

My problem with Raunch is I don’t think he would have allowed the stuff to play out as it later did. I felt like MADD cleaned up a lot of stuff before Conboy came in, except for losing Joan Collins. Creatively, Taggert and Culliton had good ideas, but a lot of the stuff was much better executed under Conboy than some right now are giving him credit for. Personally, if Conboy, Taggert, and Culliton had continued to helm “Guiding Light” the show would be in better shape, at least creatively.

Overall, I don’t mind Conboy. I don’t agree with Conboy and Weston’s decision to go for, and deliver, a younger demographic to the show, but they did it successfully. Ratings didn’t fall until after the Maryanne Carrouthers mystery climaxed. When Wheeler came in, she valiantly tried to grab the older viewers that Conboy/Weston had alienated, but failed.

Conboy and Weston did make mistakes, but they maintained most of the characters that Raunch had left, even if that meant they were on recurring status. The show had a core even if it wasn’t used to the best of it’s ability. Also, 2003 was a year most soaps were falling in the ratings whereas Guiding Light remained fairly stable. I just think that while these two weren’t by any means amazing, they weren’t as bad as the were made out to be. Yet, I know that's an unpopular opinion.

  • Members
Posted

^I do agree, some of the stories were better executed when Conboy joined Taggart and Culliton. However, I disagree with the Conboy/Weston praise, they made me turn off GL for good. I think Weston is just as bad Kreizman, only GL had a better budget then, which makes things even more worse.

Not just the baseball set controversy, but Conboy revamped most of GL's sets and overall production, which was very costly. I thought the major reason for his firing stemmed from budget problems and ratings not rising (but they were relatively stabled compared to most other soaps at the time I guess).

  • Members
Posted

By no means was expecting others to like Weston. I did, but I know that it is an unpopular opinion. I thought Conboy was fired because he refused to follow network mandates. He had aired a racy nude scene around the time of the Janet Jackson incident. Ratings didn't fall until his firing had been announced and if budget was the case I don't understand why Conboy was hired back after he quit in December 2003.

Sorry, I was aware of the other sets, but forgot to mention it. Some were revamped and I think there were also a lot of new large sets. I remember the haunted museum (which I suspect was a hold over from Taggert), Orchid Mansion, and Eden's loft being fairly large sets that were brand new. However, Ellen Wheeler revamped most of the sets in the fall of 2004 and they were fairly new. Honestly, Wheeler's sets, at least initially, weren't as nice as Conboy's, but that's my opinion.

  • Members
Posted

Now I will give Rauch some credit. The beginning and the end of his tenure were both fairly good, but the middle sucked ass. Major ass.

Agreed completely. Those first two months of 2003 were brilliant with a capital B. The beginning of the Reva stalker mystery had me on the edge of my seat.

  • Members
Posted

The interesting thing about Kreizman and Weston is that they are really on opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of their GL tenures.

Weston had HORRIBLE ideas that did not fit in with GL (the hooker serial killer, Ben Reade; Pornstar-Shayne as baseball player; Maryanne Carruthers), but she had fairly good execution. The stories had some structure and were paced well. Technically they were fairly decent stories. Just not on GL. She turned the show into a movie-of-the-week.

Meanwhile, Kreizman alot of times has some rather brilliant ideas. The Cassie/Josh/Reva triangle, on paper, was a brilliant idea, especially is LW would have been there to play it. The Roger story was done with good intentions. The Holly/Blake/Sebastian/Alan storyline would have been BRILLIANT had he followed through on it. The breast cancer story for Reva could have galvanized the show.

But the problem is that Kreizman has HORRIBLE execution. His pacing is haphazard and that was even BEFORE they started those damn ITL episodes. His characterization is juvenile and his writing has all the humor of a demented frat boy. His stories sucked, not because they were good ideas, but because he had no idea how to bring those stories come to life on the screen. Had he gotten a good co-HW with enough creative influence, he could have done much better IMO.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy