Jump to content

GL: September Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

How is possible that this show can get 0.3 rating in the 18-34 age category for the past ratings week, that is abysmal. I would recommend that they get Josh and Reva back together ASAP, that probably one of the few things that they can do to get the ratings up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They need to get rid of the dead wood, bring back old faces like Marah, Shayne, Mindy, Philip and Alan-Michael, maybe Lucy, and give the show it's heart back. I never really understood the whole 'heart' thing but after watching old clips on YouTube (as recent as Joan Collins' turn as Alexandra and the whole Ex Wives Club thing, and as far back as the Reilly penned Blackout), I can now see that the show is lacking that 'heart' that made it so watchable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean can you imagine Marah's reaction when she returns to find her mother shacked up with her former lover, who has also bedded her aunt? There are so many ways they could go with this, all pointing towards a Josh/Reva reunion. Then perhaps she would get involved with Cyrus, which would leave Reva fuming as Cyrus is Grady's brother, factor in Daisy and Grady and make them interesting...maybe bring back Alan Michael for a Marah, AM, Cyrus triangle or something like that.

I think the show really needs a central heroine; I think bringing Mindy Lewis back could be great...maybe have her know Cyrus from living in Europe, do someting fun with her. GL is sorely lacking that sense of community that really makes soaps unique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, EW and Co. have finally did it. They have driven me away from GL after 30 years of watching. This was my first soap and I never thought that I'd give up on it, but I have.

It's still on the 'ol DVR, but I just delete the shows without watching. :(

I mean, really, why would I care about an unreptentant murder molesting some trailer trash chick or whiny Cassie's friendship with his loser brother or (as RVD would say) Marina and her lurch lookalike boyfriend? What else is there? Bill/Lizzie? eh. They had potential, but it's been wasted. Jeffrey/Reva/Josh? played. out.

How depressing. Thanks EW & DK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I was really hoping that somehow, someway, someone would realize how assinine it would be to have Reva knocked up by Cassie's rapist/Marah's last SpringfieldShag and put a stop to it before it aired but alas, they did it anyway.

My only solace was that this pathetic couple got the wedding they deserved: a ridiculous white-trash joke in some random grass field in the middle of nowhere with hot-dogs and fake beer at a "reception" filled with people who were only there because it was lunch time and they didn't have anywhere indoors to go because there's no budget for air-conditioning.

This laughingstock of a show couldn't even afford to throw a half-way decent wedding for the couple that they're willing to destroy the whole canvas over! How hilarious is that?! Even the phony-baloney re-enactment of Jeva's Cross Creek wedding was better, more romantic, and more heartfelt than this farce. Did they blow ALL their money on that or on the courtroom set for Scumbag Grady's trial? And don't even get me started on the romantic stylings of PippiLongstockingMarina and her godfather, Lurch. Ugh.

Episodes like today remind that I HAVE to keep watching GL, not because it's good or because I still feel any loyalty to what it's become but simply because the sheer crappiness of it is almost awe-inspiring in and of itself. Can garbage of this magnitude really happen by accident? Or is it all part of some sick, cynical design?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What really [!@#$%^&*] pisses me off is the thought that these hacks - somehow that word doesn't really describe them - they're worse than that - will be the ones penning GL's swan song next year. :angry:

Really, how can it survive past 2009? Would CBS/P&G/TeleNext green light another year of this drivel?

And Reva REALLY PREGNANT? REALLY? How did they explain that one? She went through menopause a few years ago for cryin out loud. <_<

The madness has to end. I wish, hope, pray (all in vein I'm sure) that someone, somewhere at CBS/P&G/TeleNext would just say "screw the budget" and get a competent EP (Ed Scott) and a writer (Give Nancy Curlee anything she wants) and at least let the show go out with dignity. I know it will never happen. Like someone said a few months ago, the final scene will probably be the Foley brothers having a beer in a field somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What the f*ck was that last piece of [!@#$%^&*] episode?????!?!?!??? Reva and Jeffrey getting married, and the only people in attendance were the Coopers...it was like a nightmare come true!?!?!?

Just take the [!@#$%^&*] off my screen and cancel the show. I dont know why they didnt just say, "Hey, its been good, goodbye guys," on the 65th anniversary when the show was actually back to being good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know they were trying to make that wedding a 'clever' comedy of errors and all, but the guest list had me more distracted than anything - is the budget that tight? Imagine if Alan and Beth or Bill and Lizzie ever tie the knot, we'll be down to cameramen and production crew being the only ones in attendence at their weddings :rolleyes:

I've tried to not bash EW too much lately because she's supposedly doing what she can with the shoestring budget she's given, but c'mon! You'd do much better by firing the entire writing staff and hiring just 1 great HW and 2 or 3 folks who really know how to put together script, history and dialogue - then you'd be able to fill that teenie tiny little town, so Springfield has an average population of more than 6 at a time :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy