Jump to content

Andrew Lloyd Webber premiers Phantom of the Opera 2


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

OK since we have no theatre section on here...

First off, I love musical theatre prob as much as I love soap opera--if not more. But I'm pretty picky, I admit. Stephen Sondheim is a god of mine, so are Bob Fosse and Michael Bennett and modern more avant garde composers like Michael John LaChiusa, Ahrens and Flaherty, etc. Andrew Lloyd Webber has become increasingly one of the laziest major composers out there--but I admit a lot of his shows are guilty pelasures of mine, and when I saw Phantom for the first time back when I was 8 I was obssessed--until I discovered Into the Woods, Company and Sweeney Todd and realized how much more complex and moving musical theatre could be.

No matter, I still have a lot of affection for the overblown piece. But a sequel always seemed such an awful idea--even though Webber has been talking about it for a decade. The piece never makes you wondr what's coming next, the character sin Phantoma re so vague there' sno where to go with them--there's NO point except money.

But ALW has a whole team signed on to do Phantom 2, including Sarah Brightman back on board, for a 2009 opening. As he usually does he just premiered a workshop of Act 1 to his guests at his Sydmonton country estate. You have got to hear how increidbly bizarre the plot is--sex robots? Amusement parks? Freak shows? I admit a part of me wants to see this much more now just cuz it sounds like it will be so over the top bizarre

(to be fair musical theatre sequels have always been disastrous and bizarre bombs--we got a Bye Bye Birdie sequel called Bring Back Birdie which involved hippie cults and mass hypnosis, and TWO different attempts at Annie sequels, the main one Miss Hannigan's Revenge involving Hannigan getting plastic surgery to become Annie's adopted mother... Musical theatre on Broadway is SUCH an expensive investment I never get how these get greenlit)

And the title sounds like a bad direct to video Disney title!

The Playbill article reveals the synopsis of Phantom: Once Upon Another Time:

Quote from: The New York Post

The Phantom, having fled Paris, is running a freak show. At night, he crawls into his lair and makes love to an automaton that looks like Christine. Christine, meanwhile, has become a famous opera singer. But she's fallen on hard times because her husband, Raoul, has squandered their fortune. So she's accepted a high-paying gig from a mysterious impresario to open a new amusement park. On her first night in New York, she draws back the curtain in her hotel suite and comes face to face with her new employer — flash of lightning, crash of chords — the Phantom! Christine has a child, Gustave, but is his father Raoul or the Phantom?

:huh::huh::huh: I already see the role of a Christine like sex automaton being a stunnign dual role for Miss Brightman :rolleyes:

http://www.playbill.com/news/article/119528.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A proper recast for Alex, who pulls the strings behind the scenes (and doesnt HATE Amanda like MarjAlex did) would be great..at that point I see her having her fingers in the pie just to make sure it all doesnt go to hell. My rival for Phillip would be my fan fiction of a kid of Ed and Ritas. Somehow Roger got a hold of him, made him think he was Alan's kid ( I would think Rita would push him as someone who could get a piece of the Spaulding) and secretly raised him to HATE Spaulding and work to take them all down...of course the truth comes out that he is Ed's kid, so we have a "bad" Bauer who is Phillip's match, and Rick is stuck in the middle trying to make a relationship with the brother who HATEs his best bud.
    • Does anyone know what happened to her post-RH? She seemed to evaporate after she left the show. Which is why I can believe she said negative things about the show--maybe it got her labeled as "difificult?" I thought she was a very good actress. I liked her performance as Siobhan. She had really good chemistry with Michael Levin. IMO, they were a bit gutless not to go for a Jack/Siobhan romance after Mary was killed off.
    • You might be going crazy and overthinking, because that's not how it goes.  Right now, it's the Hamiltons versus the Richardsons in the openings, with Alex Alegria/Buglioli/Ben Gavin with the Richardsons (Opening B), while Jen Jacob is with the Hamiltons (Opening A). Opening A: Brandon Claybon Timon Kyle Durrett Marquita Goings Jibre Hordges Jen Jacob Mike Manning RhonniRose Mantilla Arielle Prepetit Opening B: Alex Alegria Lauren Buglioli Sean Freeman Ben Gavin Trisha Mann-Grant Ambyr Michelle Colby Muhammad Keith D. Robinson By your reasoning, the opening should be (and would make zero sense): Opening A: Alex Alegria Lauren Buglioli Brandon Claybon Timon Kyle Durrett Sean Freeman Ben Gavin Marquita Goings Jibre Hordges Opening B: Jen Jacob Trisha Mann-Grant Mike Manning RhonniRose Mantilla Ambry Michelle Colby Muhammad Keith D. Robinson Arielle Prepetit
    • Oh yes, I still remember that. But I'm much kinder to David Henesy than you are overall.
    • I just finished the Locher Room Texas reunion.  I really enjoyed it.  I love that the actors have such fond memories of the time they spent working on Texas and with each other.  It is really special and unique.  Kin was being Kin.  He was moving the camera around or he was constantly moving, at one point he is completely in the dark, then you can't hear him.  lol.  He is like a hyper child.   And as I suspected Alan admitted he has not read Tom Lisanti's book.  It is lazy and unprofessional for him to not have done so before speaking with this group.
    • They were always meant to be short-term, I think - at least Mick and Lou. 
    • No it's alphabetical between the two openings - the A-whatever is opening 1 and whatever-Z is opening 2. So in theory, if his last name started with an A, he'd be first in opening 1 and they would have had to remove Maurice (who was in opening 2), which requires edits to both. Unless I'm going crazy haha

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • All depends, really. Whichever opening had Johnson would have had to change; it's not like he was in both openings.
    • Well, it's alphabetical, so they got lucky with the actor's name fitting into place like that. Otherwise, if they stayed alphabetical, they could have had to change both.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy