Jump to content

June 23-27, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Enjoying this discussion...

Sylph, you're saying that even though serials are "out there," it doesn't mean they are successful. To a certain extent, this is true, but look at the top five dramas/comedies for the television season that just concluded:

1. Desperate Housewives--serial

2. House--serial

3. CSI--not serialized

4. Grey's Anatomy--serial

5. NCIS--not serialized

Of course the top two are American Idol and Dancing with the Stars, which may or may not be "serialized" depending on your point of view.

Therefore, of the top five television shows, 60% are serialized.

Is there a limit, as the article says, on how much serialization we can take? Perhaps. As a regular television viewer I'm used to it. Although I grew up on a steady diet of all-your-problems-and-cases-solved-in-thirty-or-sixty-minutes, my viewing habits have changed so much that I find television shows that are not serialized quaint, and usually dull. I don't think that soap operas losing viewership has to do with our lack of appetite for serialization. Of course, there's the opposite tack that perhaps, at one time, soaps were our ONLY item of serialization, and now that our serialization tummies are FULL, we'll throw up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I guess I'm saying that there should be a controlled diet of serials. Not too many, not to little.

And yes, cct, I find the formula "one episode - one story" dull, too. That's why I wouldn't call House a serial and I wouldn't call Grey's a serial (I actually loathe the show). Grey's is a dramedy (I loathe that term, too), which per se doesn't mean that if something is a dramedy, it's not a serial. It's just that the tone of that show doesn't allow me to see it as a serious dramatic serial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now I see what your definition of serialized is, Sylph. Grey's and House are not as serialized as AMC or B&B. Instead of all the threads still dangling and loose at the end, Grey's and House managed to at least tie off a few knots by the end of the episode. (Although Grey's, IMHO, lands squarely in the drama category.) I suppose with this definition, there are very few shows out there that are serials, as the soap operas are.

I just think we are too fragmented in our choices of television watching. With the proliferation of cable, we saw the first drop in viewership (late 80's). Now I think we are seeing a generation of "story-watchers," literally dying off. My grandmother was the one who hooked me on AMC; my other grandmother watched the CBS shows. Both have passed almost ten years ago now. Without those grandmothers, no one is out there to pass this on. And the stigma will certainly keep enough people away from trying it on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure, all these shows, including CSI franchise and the like, have at least one story (usually a minor one) that propagates through the whole season. Bu as I said, I wouldn't call them serials: if something has a "one episode - one story" format, then for me that's not a serial. Wikipedia's definition:

Serials

in television and radio are series, often in a weekly prime time slot, that rely on a continuing plot that unfolds in a serial fashion, episode by episode. Serials typically follow main plot arcs that span entire seasons or even the full run of the series, which distinguishes them from traditional episodic television.

Yes, add the disgust with the genre of daytime soaps to the frustration and you have a winning formula. No one watched these shows anymore. Maybe this is a sort of an addition for psychologists to study: why people can't quit their favourite soap even when it's abysmal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is true. Serial formats often start out strong and do not last too long. Soap operas are out there for 40 years and the same stories are retold. In many instances, the same characters are on for years and years and years. Dallas and Dynasty are the last seriels that I can think of that lasted even close to a decade.

I think if soap viewing was not based on what people enjoy and strictly on habit, there would not be these week to week ups and downs. Look at Young and the Restless, did a half a million of its habited viewers die in recent months? What you are seeing in soaps over the past two years is not random variability. It is declines that are statistically significant.

I also don't think that because we see attrition in serials, serials should be done away with. It's just a simple statement that serials do not have the longetivity. CSI and Law and Order, in my opinion are not serials in the same sense that Brothers & Sisters, Desperate Housewives, Lost are. CSI and Law and Order do not carry stories from one episdoe to the next over the course of a year or a number of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No but SERIALIZED elements are common to nearly everything on TV now. EVen an 80s book on soaps I has mentions how the "new" sitcom Cheers uses some serilization techniques to keep watchers wanting to watch each week. Now it's hard to think of one sitcom that doesn't (Maybe According to Jim but I don't watch)

Back in the 60s thru 70s and into the 80s every drama and sitcom could be watched nearly in any order. Character's realtionships didn't change and if they did change within an episode they'd basically have to return to square one by the end of the episode cuz each story had to start from the same place. EXCEPT with soaps (and the odd nigthtime soap)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK I forgot L&O and CSI in my list--they're pretty stand alone case by case (though they have more continuation than Perry Mason ever did)

But lotsa serials have run close to or over a decade besides just Melrose and 90210. NYPD Blues, Hillstreet Blues (often call,ed liek Cheers, the first of its kind to adapt serial elements), St Elsewhere, ER, Buffy/Angel, Smallville, SHowtime/HBO/F/X shows,

Shows with serialized elements like sitcoms that ran for ages were Frasier, Friends, Will and Grace, etc (the Daphne Niles thing in Frasier, Ross and Rachel, etc 60s and 70s sitcoms didn't have stuff liek that carry over episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know. For some of the series it didn't matter much at all, but I notice all the time watching Golden Girls how they could have benefitted from serializing some things.

They were constantly screwing around with some of the history of the characters as they went along but of course it didn't matter because it was a comedy but as a fan of the serialized format - it is noticeable to me alot.

****************************

And I guess I have a broader definition of soap opera than some but I see a lot of the shows as soaps that some don't. I don't see Law & Order & CSI as one but I do ER, Lost, Grey's Anatomy, Brothers & Sisters, Nip/Tuck and so many others that are popular right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see where you are going with that. And yeah, I agree.

I do not think shows with serialized elements are similar to soap operas in design, however. I do agree that shows do contain more serialized elements now. I probably would argue about Friends, Will and Grace being amongst those, however. There were bouts of serialization with those shows, but would not say a lot of the sitcoms have serialization as a defining feature.

But I can see where ER (in particular) and other dramas do have that characteristic. I think the difference is that ER, St. Elsewhere, Hillstreet Blues (I'd call the first to carry that to primetime) used serialization to define characters, if that makes sense. Lost, Desperate Housewives are a little different in that I think they are set up so that one show leads to the next. Hillstreet Blues had little stories within stories -- subplots I guees. Those little stories lasted throughout the year or even history of the show. However, most weeks, the dominate feature of the show was not the serialization.

I also classify shows like Grey's Anatomy, Lost, Brothers &Sisters as more soaps. I think it was Steve Frame who said that too.

By the way, I loved Hill Street Blues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You obviously haven't read all my posts that followed. Even though something has serialised elements, it doesn't mean it is a serial. And why on Earth is everyone using the capitals when the text can be italicised and bolded? :P

I find him, his American Beauty and Six Feet Under laaaargely overestimated. I watched the show, but I found it unbearable with all its gloom, sickness and plain awfulness. A terrible show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was never a fan of Six Feet Under, but I did enjoy American Beauty. It was dark and it was gloomy, but it was so different at the time, it was done and I thought very creative. The acting was excellent too. I never found watching a paper bag blow around so interesting. :lol: I'm going to rent it and watch it again at some point to see if I find it as interesting now as I did years ago.

You know, I tend to think of that movie more as interesting than enjoyable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

sorry, Sylph. It may be my fault EVERYONE ;) is using capitals and not bolding and italicizing. Being relatively new here, I just realized you could do this. Not all boards have this feature.

I think we have to agree to disagree on Six Feet Under, though. I thought first season was one of the most brilliant seasons of television. I was invested in each and every character. It was definitely a serial. What about Sopranos; serial or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Tamara Tunie was on a local CBS affiliate in Baltimore the other day talking about a few things she had going on, BTG amongst them: "Beyond the Gates" star Tamara Tunie is in Baltimore for the Reginald F. Lewis Museum's 20th anniversary
    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy