Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Thanks, saynotoursoap.

Carl, this is pure speculation, but I believe the show intended to pair Curtis and Ava again in 1992 when Addie Walsh was headwriter. Initially, when Ava started working at Burnell's, her mysterious boss was a Mr. A who had known Ava for some time. I think Walsh's plan was to pair Curtis and Ava, but Walsh left and Haidee Granger served as interim headwriter. Instead of Curtis, we got Leo Burnell, which made little sense since Burnell's was owned by the Aldens when Ava first appeared in 1984.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

I started watching under Addie W's run, but she never seemed to be given a chance. Though the show went through so many changes (as it always did) who knows. I did like a lot of Taggert/Guza's run, and I largely loved Nixon's (kinda strange and gothic) return, when the original Curtis returned as Dante's "pet"

  • Members
Posted

Yeah it was a really bad idea to basically open City (after a few months anyway--I think it was 6) with a NEW serial killer story that was set up and advertised so similarly to the Loving murders. I am positive someone thought ratings weren't climbing fast enough and mandated it--but it was way way too soon. And regardless--as has been pointed out, most of the potential victims were characters people barely even had grown to know yet, so the huge threat of the Loving Murders didn't exist.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

That didn't stop my ex from loving both stories.

Who exactly was Melissa Dye's character supposed to be again? Why'd she do it?

I know serial killer stories are played out now but I've never seen one done as classily and well-handled promotion-wise since then. I could go for a well-told one with that same effort.

Edited by Vee
  • Members
Posted

I agree, I just think it was redundent. Wasn't she an actress? And.... I forget (of course she was hinted to have come back and killed Sidney in the finale). I loed the City pretty much a few months AFTER that story on, so I guess it gave it some momentum story wise, but...

  • Members
Posted

Ha Frankie doing some dance modelling shot to Rupaul! :D

Thanks for posting that. Did Frankie make the move to The City or was he already in film school or whatever--I can't remember.

I do think by the time Jacob was on they already knew they would be rebooting and he'd be going with Angie to the new show--she was underused on Loving but I did like how her and Jacob kinda were the anchoring couple on The City. A lot of characters added in 1995 were obviously set up to be City characters.

Forgot that Jane Elliot was a producer on Loving...

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Alimi's Frankie was on The City too. I noticed that music cue in the scene with Jacob and Tanya sounded very The City-like.

The Jane Elliot connection was very interesting as she'd later return in actor form as Tracy. I wonder if it was hard for her not to "call the shots" when she saw [!@#$%^&*] being done incorrectly.

Edited by SFK
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Yeah I wonder if they were already trying some City type things (though of course it was still traditionally filmed). I do remember Frankie--kinda, I guess he was one of that first wave of characters who moved out (like Bernard and Azure C the transexual or whatever...)

As much as I love Morgan Fairchild, I think The City really came to life when Tracy moved in (not just cuz of her, everything just started to mesh)--but I found the switch strange too--of course a number of soap actors have moved back and forth between being producers or especially writers, but usually once they move behind the scenes, they only return for cameos (Francesca James, Gillian Spencer, Ellen Wheeler, Pam Long, Megan McTavish... I'm sure some would hope some of these people would have returned to acting instead of producing or writing...)

Edited by EricMontreal22
  • Members
Posted

I think Gillian Spencer moved back from writing to acting during her AMC stint.

I remember an interview with Jane right after she came on The City where they talked about her checking the lighting, just automatically.

Thanks for the clip, SFK. I had wondered if you were doing OK. I've seen nothing of this particular time right before the murders. The show seems like it's in good shape to me. I'm reminded of why I liked Angie/Charles and how Debbi managed to create a believable relationship with Geoffrey Ewing. I hadn't seen that story about Jacob's fake, bad acting sister, but I did laugh at the "incest" line.

I guess this is when Deborah had her heart attack. NAA is so moving in that scene. She was such an underrated, understated actress.

The ending speaks for itself. I wonder if that was a new scene or something from earlier in the episode.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I really liked whoever it was who played Richard Wilkins, but that may be influenced by my having a thing for a young Australian friend of mine. He was cute and fun.

What fascinates me about Loving now, at least in the early-mid '90s is how it feels like pretty much stock Agnes Nixon to me, a primer in just how she views soaps and how her machine runs - she seemed to keep visiting and revisiting a lot of the same simple, basic youth triangles and canvases, trying to make them work. While there's some nutty stuff, a lot of it seems like simple, somewhat elegant storytelling in a lot of ways, but effective no matter when you revisit it. You have Jessica Collins (who was very good) and Robert Tyler alone in a bar unable to be with each other, and that's all you need. Same with, say, Amelia Heinle as Steffi and Michael Weatherly's buttoned up but tortured Cooper. And then of course there was that whole college revamp where the Rebecca Gayheart character was basically the same model as a Tara Martin/Becca Tyree/etc. Until down the road, characters like Steffi or Dinah Lee seem to supplant her in the same role of a vulnerable young woman who still clearly has integrity. The problem is that Loving I think eventually just became a petri dish for numerous people's ideas, including Agnes's - there was no real core beyond a few people. It was completely fluid.

Edited by Vee
  • Members
Posted

I agree with you - I think at its core there is a simple purity to Loving that probably wasn't seen as good enough at the time, but holds up now. The acting also tends to be of a high standard, most of the time, by the last 3-4 years.

As for Molly on The City, I think she was an out of work actress who had a lot of issues with her mother. I can't remember exactly why she had a history of mental illness. She kept it hidden from everyone, including viewers, until the reveal where she told Danny she was on the phone with her mother, only for viewers to realize she had called the weather, or something like that.

ChuckR7 used to have some clips of this story but his channel is gone now.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy