Jump to content

May 12-16, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

ok thanks for the info..although how is it that GH was 2.8 with a total viewership of 3,389,000? and if I'm not mistaken it wasn't that long ago that GH grabbed that many viewers back in November sweeps of 2007. but it was around 2.5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

any type of super event AMC/OLTL pull off wont matter to most fans that tuned out in the first place if the writing is boring and not in the least bit capitivating..to them they have seen it all....baby switches. wtd. romance with couples that never last forever..and so on. nothing new. if i wanted to see a husband turned gay killer. I'll watch passions. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're not off there.

GH

4/23/07.......3.....2.8.....09.....2) 1.9/11.....3) 3,604,000

4/30/07.......3.....2.7.....09...*1) 1.8/12.....3) 3,538,000

5/7/07.........3.....2.7.....09...*1) 1.9/12.....3) 3,607,000

5/14/07.......3.....2.7.....09...*1) 1.9/12.....3) 3,611,000

5/21/07.......3.....2.7.....09...*1) 1.9/12.....3) 3,607,000

5/28/07.......3.....2.6.....08.....2) 1.8/11.....3) 3,458,000

6/4/07.........3.....2.5.....08.....2) 1.6/10.....3) 3,394,000

I guess that's because of the annual rise in how many households it takes to make up a ratings point. And I guess the difference in household watching at a particular hour of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

no they pretty much stayed the same since 2003/4. it was the 90's when GH was in the 6.000.000 rang. the 80's when GH was in the 13.9' same with Y&R fighting for the number one spot..but GH top the charts with the whole Luke & Laura wedding that grabbed 30.000.000 million viewers in just that one event..however you can't single out one soap when all soaps lost millions of viewers over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let us not forget AMC was the #1 ABC soap from like 92-95.

I think it could be argued that AMC was the carrier ABC soap in late April-June 2006 and for a month or two at the end of the babyswitch. It wasn't hands down, but you couldn't outright say that it wasn't AMC helping along it's weaker siblings for those moments. I have to look at OLTL's rating for the time to beat GH to see how long they were doing what for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Never say never about GH being bested by other ABC soaps. I never thought I'd see OLTL be in better shape than AMC ratings wise. And we're only talking tenths of points here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It absolutely did. Took the #3 spot in households (not that HH's matter to the execs)

WHich is what makes that story that much more tragic - because it was just a plot point to write three characters out and explain an inherited murder mystery. If the story had continued beyond a Sweeps stunt, who knows? Maybe it could have stayed there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

5/29/06.......3.....2.8.....09...*2) 1.9/11.....3) 3,634,000 (+.1 GH, AMC and more viewers) - DC Dealio?

6/19/06.......6.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.8/11.....3) 3,435,000 (-.1 HH but more Viewers than GH, AMC)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh but you can. Since 2003/2004 the ratings have gone way down. And yes, GH has lost the most viewers this past year than any other soap on ABC. As you can plainly see from Toups' ratings info GH has lost 658,000 viewers compared to last year.

But then, it's not to say that the rest of daytime is swinging with success. In fact, every soap has hit the skids...it's sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Really an excellent point. I'm worried about Derek but he's not working. The Duprees being too good somehow ... well, if they say it instead of be it, okay yes, I would worry but as long as they keep on being good, geeze, that's something to celebrate, not worry!!!  Party on?!
    • I blame Mitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree. For now. I am sure in a year's time...a new family (or old) will start to appear on the show. 
    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy