Jump to content

Official Pre-Nom List


SoapQueen89

Recommended Posts

  • Members

wow. i really am shcoked by a few things. GL & AMC only having two lead actress. Passions having no lead actors, and only two in supporting. beth e from GL and emily h from passions were robbed.

and of course the faces of the soaps - dee hall, erika s, susan l - in lead is wrong and becky & am in supporting is also wrong.

but i must say all in all this is one of the better lists i have seen in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"Kendall" was most certainly not the star all year long. As a matter of fact, she was window dressing right up until mid July. The year began with the 'Satin Slayer' storyline in which she was in a supporting role to Thorsten Kaye. Then she floated around with Erica and Jack's separation and Bianca's relationship with Zoe. Next came trying to save Fusion but that story was all about Greenlee's return to Pine Valley, followed by trying to prevent Greenlee from ruining Ryan and Annie's wedding, dealing with Greenlee's threats to send Zach to jail for the Blackout, and Greenlee's wanting to be around Spike. Kendall also made a few appearances in TK's story with David Canary in early summer.

Then, when Alicia did have her lead story, she shared just as much time with Sabine Singh. In the months that followed, she was on almost everyday, saying the same things over and over again because AMC had no one else to put on screen at that point. Alexa had left. Sydney was still on maternity leave. Lucci was on her extended vacation. The only other big story was Leven's "Ava" and the KWAK triangle.

The reality is that AMC has very few strong actresses on their show. It is very unbalanced that most of their female actresses fall into the Younger category. For 2006, Alicia could go lead because AMC had Cady McClain, Alexa Havins, Eden Reigel, Terri Ivens, and Kate Collins to fill the supporting category. So IMO, you can't simply look at airtime. You have to look at each show as a whole, and AMC did not have the cast to fill the spaces for 2007.

And again, that will never happen. Soaps have alienated enough viewers. If TPTB were to go and put Erika Slezak, Deidre Hall and Susan Lucci in the Supporting Category, the audience that has watched soap operas for 30+ years would be rioting in the streets. Putting them in Lead is the last sign of respect and a symbol of gratitude for all these women have done in this industry, because they sure as hell aren't going to get more money or publicity at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
and, IMHO, thats stupid. Awards should not b given out based on respect and how long you have been on a show. They should be given out biased on who had the best performance. Just because you have been on a show for XX amount of years doesn't mean you are the lead actress. If people are not going to use the category's correctly why are they there? Why have a Lead Actress if the people in it are not lead? Why have supporting when really those ancestress are the lead, but because they have not been on the show for as long as some others they are supporting.

And i do see what you are saying re AM as lead/supporting, but if thats the case then why is SL & BE in lead? Neither one of them had any more story that AM did. Soap Opera are an ensemble show, no one has a storyline all to themselves. There are always at least two, if not more, leads in a storyline. So i don't get the entire she didn't have her own storyline argument, as she had many story lines that she was the lead in, and many story lines where she wasn't the lead, but was on just as much as the lead.

I just think it is hilarious that the actress who was on more than anyone else is in supporting. And again, it doesn't have everything to do with how much you are on, but to say that isn't a major factor? come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure the ATWT/bloc voting snarking will begin anytime now. Unless I'm mistaken, they have the max number of nom's in every category.

As for KZ...didn't she promise again this year not to submit herself? I really don't think she had the material this year at all. And it seemed like she was gone for huge chunks of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Before offering my reaction, let me respond to two concerns some others expressed.…

1) Alicia Minshew (Kendall), All My Children. The actress submitted in early-2007 for lead actress. That was for work done Jan. 1-Dec. 31, 2006, as part of last June 15, 2007 Daytime Emmy awards. Minshew going back to supporting -- well, I agree, it's b.s.

2) Kim Zimmer (Reva), Guiding Light. The four-time Emmy champ said, prior to her 2005-06 win, that if she prevailed with her fourth she would stop submitting herself. Well, in 2006 storyline, her Reva got the cancer journey, and she ended up speaking too soon. So Zimmer submitted and got nominated for the 2006-07 season. This time out, Zimmer refrained from submitting. She told someone in the press that she figured she didn't have the story to make it worthwhile seeking another [2007-08] nomination. Zimmer has been nominated 11 times.

And now.…

My reaction to this year's Prenoms....

They're unacceptable.

I am angry over the folks at GL for not Prenominating Beth Ehlers (Harley) as lead actress. In one of the year's golden performances, Ehlers had the goods to finally win her first Emmy on what would've been her sixth nomination with that Jan. 25, 2007 "70th Anniversary" tribute special (in which Ehlers took on interpreting serial creator Irna Phillips and blew everyone away); and she dug deeply in Harley's marital breakup with Gus (lead-actor Prenom Ricky Paull Goldin) plus in reaction to a daugher that went through an abortion.

Had this year's ballot had the integrity the industry keeps feebily begging, Ehlers would be battling The Young and the Restless' Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki), Days of Our Lives' Deidre Hall (Marlena), and The Bold and the Beautiful's Katherine Kelly Lang (Brooke) for this year's best-actress statue. (My hunch is that official nomination roster will bomb once again!)

I would like to rip [GL] another you-know-what....

And I will not excuse [GL] for also failing to anoint a supporting-actress slot to the delightful Orlagh Cassidy, a scene-stealing pro as ambitious-mother-from-hell Doris Wolfe.

I am disgusted at General Hospital's continued manipulation of the supporting-actress race, in which two of their submitted three were leads, and only Carolyn Hennessy's Diane Miller was in a true supporting role. For not giving a slot to 1981 [Emmy-] winner Jane Elliot, so rip-roaringly terrific as Tracy (especially enlight of her pairing with TV hubby, and lead-actor hopeful, Anthony Geary's Luke), this is unforgivable.

B&B denying a supporting-actress bid to Alley Mills, so sublime and surprising as Steph's secretive sis Pamela, also puts this year's ballot to shame.

And Y&R, which spearheaded this Prenoms change back in 2003 because they griped over egregious snubs the year prior, continues to abuse by submitting so-what performances (Jeanne Cooper, woefully underwhelming as Katherine, once again trying for best actress), while denying musts-slots to the truly terrific acting achievements (last year it was Victoria Rowell as Dru; this year it's Jess Walton as Jill and Michael Graziadei as Daniel).

Yeah, I've had enough of [Y&R's] hypocrisy, too.

You know, I'm really fed up with these people who fail to bring credibility to this Daytime Emmy process. I will not put up with them this year. I will be boycotting. And I will tune out a number of these soaps (just as an added "bonus").

I will not congratulate any of the Prenominees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well I, for one, am going celebrate the pre-noms for every one of the DAYS performers that are on the list because that's all the recognition they're gonna get. We all know it. I congratulate every single one of them.

DAYS hasn't had an acting Emmy in 21 years but I see precious little ranting about that, except maybe here at SON.

I don't watch the CBS soaps and I'm sure you may have valid points. I enjoyed reading them and I enjoy your posts at The Envelope. Good luck with your boycott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, that clip of Belle will have to wait for next year's Emmy awards. It aired this year, not the year for the nominations on this list. I wish to say congratulations and good luck to all the Days pre-noms. It angers me more than a little that this is probably as far as the academy will go with them...but they're all winners and worthy adversaries in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No Sharon Case? WTH?

I bet Maurice Benard did not even submit because of his outrage over not winning for his bipolar story? :rolleyes:

Kudos to Tyler for getting that spot, well earned. The episode he finds Emily dead he better submit that scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy