Jump to content

GH: New Opening?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Part of me hopes that AMC will retain its current opening, and I'm holding out hope that the lack of new-look bumpers for AMC causes me to think that they might want to stick with their current format, as it is a really good fit for the show.

However, I'm overjoyed that OLTL will be updating that mess they call an opening, and ditto for GH...both of them are too busy and need honed down. I think GH's new logo will be the one they show on the soaps 411 on the website, with the heart monitor and the red and blue background, while OLTL will revert back to it's old logo with the 'one' with 'life to live' below, in smaller writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The sooner the better. Maybe this time they'll cut out the recurring characters and actors who haven't been on the show in ages. Luke getting up to go pee needs a retooling too. And 2 versions would be nice. I hope no epileptic sits through the current one, because it would give seizures to someone without a medical condition. Don't cram everyone into a short opening, and you don't get that problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree with you. AMC's opening has the most originality of all the ABC soaps, I also believe that the whole photo album concept is probably the best ever created in daytime. It is just so appropriate for AMC and it stays with tradition, something that most soaps have forgotten about - except DAYS and perhaps Y&R.

Anyways, if this is true, then I am very excited for the new openings. It will be the 2004 revamp all over again - which could be a good thing or a bad thing.

LMAO! Yes it really does - and the men's shot is so unbelievably outdated. I was wondering if GH would ever update it, since that can't be an easy task to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never saw the symbolism of Y&R's opening, just the chance to fade characters in and out of an ethereal white haze. It's astounding that DAYS never succumbed to the pressure of using cast shots in over 40 years, but for me that makes it the victor. B&B effectively defines its show through the montage too, but I think it would be better to see the characters readying a fashion show. GH should have done an all-female shot too. I always got the feeling that they didn't matter as long as the stereotypical demographic of hetero women viewers got their eye candy. What the hell are the guys lingering in tuxedos for? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think GH is making a huge mistake bringing Sarah Brown back as a new character. They're banking on her popularity and the chemistry she has between SB and MB but I don't think it's going to translate into sustained ratings. Sarah is Carly Benson. LW turned Carly into her version, albeit with some success, but with the two actresses on at the same time is going to be a hard sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
    • French fan summary Rusty took over Simon's job at Lewis Trucking after Simon transferred to Lewis Oil's North Carolina office to live near Jessie and Calla. I doubt they would bother following up a story for offscreen characters eg marriage and a baby.
    • I suspected that the performance with the reveal was the reason why the Ted actor got the axe and it looks like I was right. He wasn't really good at conveying what needed to be conveyed in those scenes. Claybon is at least slowly improving (but I agree that he still needs to work on his line delivery), but I do wonder what will happen when his big reveal is coming up. 
    • I've already asked this before, recently, but can anyone who watched those years more closely tell me if anything said about Jessie and Simon at the end of their profiles is accurate (about them marrying, naming a baby after Brandon/Lujack, etc.)?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy