Jump to content

AMC: Jesse Spoiler


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, faking his death to protect his family is a lame plot device, but IMO, that's the only way Jesse would ever leave Angie and Frankie like he did. Otherwise, you're suggesting Jesse didn't want his family anymore, and as Marland once said, "He wouldn't do that."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am interested to see how the story will play out but we have had these types of stories on soaps before where someone fakes a death to protect someone or a character leaves town (not fake a death but still, in both situations, they leave the show) to protect a certain someone.

I am just glad the two are back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/...=tv#articleFull

Daytime’s ’80s ‘supercouple’ returns to ‘All My Children’

Angie and Jesse are about to be reunited and it feels so right.

One of daytime’s most memorable couples from the 1980s is returning to ABC’s “All My Children.”

Wait a minute. Didn’t Jesse die on camera?

“I’m the same character, but it’s a whole new experience,” said actor Darnell Williams. “They had to figure out a way to bring him back to life. The word is that apparently he never died. He had to fake his death in order to secure the safety of his family.”

In their ’80s heyday, the duo was dubbed daytime’s first African-American supercouple. Two decades later, network soaps have few contract players of color.

“I think it has moved a thousand steps backwards,” said actress Debbi Morgan (Angie). “It just amazes me that here we are in 2008 and we have so little representation on daytime. I don’t understand it and I think it’s shameful.”

Williams, who has coached some of the actors on the soap since 2001, said the lack of diversity is one of the reasons they were approached to return to the series.

“I think ‘All My Children’ kind of shot themselves in the foot by allowing the canvas to become so nondiversified,” he said. “And they found themselves sort of chasing their tails trying to figure out how to fix it . . . They came up with the idea, ‘Well, why not bring this core couple back that had such an appeal to such a broad audience?’ ”

Morgan said it took her only about 30 seconds to accept the soap’s offer to reprise her role.

“I can’t remember a time in my career where I felt so welcomed,” Morgan said. “It was like a homecoming. There were members of the crew that were here 20 years ago. It was just so heartfelt, it made me cry. I couldn’t believe it. I’ve played the character for so long, it’s like stepping into a pair of old shoes, as they say.”

Since ABC announced the duo’s return last month, the response from fans has astonished both actors.

“The amount of people that are interested still is kind of overwhelming,” Williams said. “The first thing they usually say, ‘I’m going to call my mother and my sisters and my brother right away and tell them that “All My Children” is back on the block.’ ”

Both actors have signed on for four years. Morgan reprises the role she began playing in 1982 tomorrow at 1 p.m. on WCVB (Ch. 5). Dr. Angie Hubbard Foster, now an infectious disease specialist, is called to Pine Valley to treat patients suffering from a mysterious ailment. On Jan. 25, Williams, who began playing Jesse in 1981, makes his first appearance.

Morgan and Williams, who refer to each other as family, have remained close friends since departing the series. They worked together on the ABC soaps “Loving” and “The City” (where Darnell played Jesse look-alike Jacob). Last year, they toured in the play “U Got Me Bent and Twisted.” But they don’t want their off-screen rapport to make it onscreen any time soon.

“I hope it’s going to be a while until everything reconciles,” Williams said. “I hope they take it at a decent pace to where the audience will believe it. If they go too quickly and make us a happily ever couple, that gets kind of boring. But I have faith that they are going to do the right thing.”

Morgan has made it clear to producers that she doesn’t want Angie in any preposterous story lines.

Soaps have changed a lot since I was on, and so many of the stories are so over the top and crazy to me,” she said. “The kind of actress that I am, I couldn’t play all that hokey kind of stuff. So I would really like to see the shows return to more real-life drama that’s akin to what goes on with people in their everyday life. I think when you can hit at that human core, it’s going to make a big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am with you DeeeDee....very pleased that Morgan spoke up and made it clear she will not play any bad storylines. If they just were to bring her back to give her crap storytelling, what would be the point of the return? I know Cady McClain (Dixie) came back to the show in 2005 because the story looked exciting but the execution happened to be poorly penned. But I have no doubts that Morgan will see to it that the execution goes well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So around '84 is when things get bad?
    • There are details through the thread, but yes, as mentioned, she hated Ellen Wheeler, and lambasted her for crying a lot, for her decisions with firing and Peapack, etc. Back in the day she also hated Pam Long, who created Reva and gave Reva all of her best material. The producers or writers she liked most seemed to be those who saw Reva in the most generic of molds, although she likely doesn't see it that way. She was OK on OLTL; I think @Vee could probably give a better summary. She was earthy and added her usual hard work to some trash material. There was nothing special going on, as yet again with patron saint Carlivati it was all plot, no character, and he cared more about writing for a cutesy child character.  You're right about what they could have done with Reva. Reva, Erica, and any women who are in story long enough face this problem. The biggest difference is Reva was allowed to age (even with the post-menopausal baby), which Erica was not.
    • Cali was the only Paulina for me on AW.  Was Judi Evans such a “name” that Cali was fired for her?  Judi basically played an entirely different character.  She could’ve been Nancy!
    • They were great together. Barbara was way too high maintenance for any man. You know Henry divorced her a$$ after about a year.  And, here’s an example of what I was talking about…
    • I watch every day as well, and I am enjoying the show. There's always room for improvement. TBH, things are much different from what I expected reading the character breakdowns. That could be a good thing! I'm willing to let them find their groove and figure out what kind of show it wants to be. The core and underlying theme. -I echo what a few others have said: The show is lacking in real romance and cross-starred lovers. But that tracks from (MVJ) experience cause the bell soaps are not good with romance IMO. -I have a feeling it's being built before our eyes, but we're missing that rival family. -I would prefer more variety of storylines. Good ones that could weave together the whole town.   -I struggle connecting to the male characters. So I hope they get a clear handle on them soon. Most of them feel underwritten and one-note. -Find a better purpose for Naomi. I fear she will be the first Dupree dumped. I completely agree. June's story does nothing for me. And what if she turns out to be Tyrell and Samantha's mom? They are very close to leaving high school. why should I care? If she turns out to be related to Hayley also, what's the long-term story, and why should I care? I believe Hayley can work on her own as a vixen. Does she need a sounding board? Sure, but you can accomplish that with an outsider's friend group. I didn't think I would be saying this, but I would entertain Kat having a forbidden affair with Jacob. Both Naomi and Jacob need something to do other than case-of-the-month storylines. 
    • That would really just be a redux of the Leslie/Eva story. I really hope they don't go there. My guess for the storyline with Anita that we have "never seen before on daytime" is that it may be a "me, too" story. Anita did unspeakable things to get ahead because of some disgusting producer, and the other person she left behind was a boyfriend who cared about her very much.
    • Reva and Zimmer needed strong adversaries/scene partners. It would dampen the negatives associated with the character and Zimmer's self-admitted excesses. I think that's why she was a bust on SB. I don't know how she did on her return to OLTL because I was not watching at that point. The problem for me with Reva is the same situation with Erica Kane. It ended up being variations of the same storyline year after year. I think if the show had truly broken up Reva and Josh and put them in other viable relationships it would have freed up the characters to have better storylines and character growth. Instead, it's as if the characters were stuck for decades.
    • I am still behind and know what upcoming week you are talking about.

      Please register in order to view this content

       And I know I'm not ready and have not been since the official news. That was my first couple on that show. You won't be alone.    When you put it like that...same. Like I say in the thread when I'm more interested in what people are wearing than the stories...red flag. No momentum. Just stalling.      lol.
    • Y&R: 10% good, 90% garbage time BtG: 90% good, 10% garbage time
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy