Jump to content

Days/Atwt- Who is the new Barbara Ryan?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Who would you like to call the new Barbara on Days, Hogan where trying to make Kate the new crazy Barbara, but you know Barbara had not much to do before Hogan Sheffer took on writing much for her, and she wasn`t really a crazy evil woman, but Kate was soon only the only real bitch before Hogan took over, if where going to something big, Caroline or Maggie should have become the new Barbara on the show...

Anyone agrees?:-...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hogan sure did love Barbara. When he started, Babs did nothing but serve coffee and listen to original Jennifer's trivial problems. By the time he was done, she was in virtually every storyline and grabbed a Best Leading Actress nomination for portrayer Collen Zenk Pinter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know what answer you're looking for here besides Kate Roberts. No other character on DAYS is even close to Barbara.

At the beginning of your post you're talking about how a character is portrayed on the show right now. But at the end you want us to think of someone who's all nice and should became a schemer. *confused*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, Hogan really took the Kate Roberts that already existed and just continued what was already established, whereas Barbara's character change (sort of like what's happening to Marlena now) was born out of a gradual evolution (well, not so gradual... getting your face disfigured or your husband killed for the eighty-seventh time will do that to you...).

If anything, I feel like Kate's been grounded more in the last few months (e.g. the scenes in the car when Lucas said he changed his name, or when she confessed to comatose Roman that she slept with Stefano for money).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hogans pulling a character change again, but this time it's Marlena who is morphing into a vengeful and angry woman. I watched Barbara before Hogan, and she was very maternal and caring. She wasn't a vindictive beast until Hogan had her flip over the Stenbeck's actions. The Stenbecks on ATWT are like the Dimeras on Days. And Barbara was the family's endless victim, much like Marlena is a victim of the Dimera's schemes.

So Hogan did chose to have one female character go psycho, and it appears he has finally got his way, and it's Marlena. I would bet money that he wanted to kill John this time last year and send Marlena over the edge, but Coirday balked. Atleast it's Deidre who will pull this off. I can't think of a better actress to tackle a story like this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As for Marlena all of a sudden going crazy, I wouldn't say it's too out character. The DiMeras have always gone after her and her family, and this time she's lost the love of her life. Marlena has gone crazy on the DiMeras before, when she tried to kill Stefano back in the 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, to be fair, Barbara wasn't always so maternal and caring. And while she never kidnapped three women before and drugged them up in a Swiss spa, she definitely had more than her fair share of vindictive moves over the last few decades. It's not as if Barbara didn't have it in her to exact revenge. She always had a cutthroat side, and it wasn't until the late nineties that Barbara became pretty much just a housewife, and might as well have been baking cookies all day and doling out advice like she was Donna Reed.

You are right that it didn't go overboard until Hogan wrote the boathouse fire though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, P.S. I think it's a perfectly understandable reaction (and I've been just as guilty of it as any other post-er on here) to jump to words like "crazy" and "psycho" when we're typing because the only times we've ever seen Marlena/DH like this is during SSK and the Posession storyline. But truth be told, everything we've seen on the show has been totally human and completely grounded in sanity. She's a woman who's been pushed too far, and now she's pushing back. But she hasn't gone over the edge. I don't even think firing the gun in the church was "psycho". (If it was, half of Salem would also have that label. :D )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

brimike, I agree. And yes, shooting EJ was wrong, but it was understandable. This man shot her husband, put him in a coma for months, and now that same man is dead. He was the love of her life, her best friend, her rock. She's been tortured by the DiMeras and after all that happened in less than a year, her daughter decides to marry this guy, who also raped said daughter.

It's a wonder she's not in a mental institution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy