Jump to content

Writer's Strike Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

I don't think Hogan will be back either because of those reasons. And if Hogan doesn't come back, neither is Meg Kelly and most, if not all, of Hogan's team. I'm sure Dena Higley will want to bring in her own writers. It could be a bloodbath at DAYS come January 2008. :o

I also bet Corday wants the strike go on until 2008, so he can get rid of Jim Reilly's expensive contract. There's a ton of money tied up in the HW position. Corday can get rid of two expensive birds with one stone.

I also think B&E and LML will be gone, while Guza, Passanante, Kreizman, Carlivati will be staying.

If I were Frons though, I would get rid of Guza's expensive contract (HW and Consulting Producer paychecks).....that's my one hope out of all the Head Writers because I watch GH everyday and I want the show improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Makes you wish you never started the Writers & Directors Thread, doesn't it, Toups?

Don't forget, though, about those incriminating photos Guza has of Frons in the utility closet w/ Cameron Mathison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As long as Frons is there, Guza and Jill Farren Phelps will NEVER be out of jobs. He was head of NBC Daytime, when both worked on Santa Barbara, and he cherished that show as much as he does GH in its present (if repulsive) state.

I often wonder if Guza is just burnt out at GH, or just a ridiculous hack. I guess we can attribute his first couple of writing stints on GH to Wendy Riche keeping him in check. However, I often wonder how it would be if Guza wrote for Days or ATWT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Guza is definitely burnt out at GH. His vision for the show isn't working and it's so repetitive. Just like when Gloria Monty returned in the 90s and it didn't work. They need to accept it and move on. JFP too, but I wouldn't want her free to ruin another soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If JFP sticks away from the writing, she can produce a good show. Look at GL in the early 90's, her time there was generally a golden era. Sure she caused some major harm to the show, like treating Beverlee McKinsey like crap thus making her walk and killing off Maureen, but her GL, thanks to Nancy Curlee, was a magnificent show. Her run at Santa Barbara was widely lauded as well, but she understood that show, more so than any other show she's worked for since. She's also very good with overall production values, music, and lighting.

You know if Frons fires JFP from GH, she's headed to Y&R next, thanks to her connection to Steve Kent at Sony....

Though, Guza's 90's run is very different from the stuff he has going on right now on GH. Back then, he wrote for vets and wrote for families, GH was definitely more of an ensemble show, but as I said before, that was probably more Wendy Riche, than Guza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JFP may be a total bitch...but if she stays the hell out of the writing she can actually produce a very decent soap. SB and GL were both pretty good with her in charge and her pioneering bloc voting has garnered her many Emmys (and we all know how Y&R loves its Emmys!).

That being said, if she fails, which she already has, she's going to fail upwards into the upper echelon of ABC-Disney. Although I hate to admit it, I think she'd be miles better than Frons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People talk about her great producing skills, but she's done a horrible job at GH. The show is dark, the sets are forgettable, the clothing and hairstyles are abysmal. What is she doing that is so great? Throw in the revolting firings of Kristina Wagner, Anna "Nobody Has a Lifetime Contract" Lee, Kari Wuhrer & Lesli Kay for getting pregnant and not doing everything in her power to get Genie Francis back full time.

The only thing I like about her is the bloc voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 22 2007, 02:53 AM)
People talk about her great producing skills, but she's done a horrible job at GH. The show is dark, the sets are forgettable, the clothing and hairstyles are abysmal. What is she doing that is so great? Throw in the revolting firings of Kristina Wagner, Anna "Nobody Has a Lifetime Contract" Lee, Kari Wuhrer & Lesli Kay for getting pregnant and not doing everything in her power to get Genie Francis back full time.

With the way Frons micro-manages the ABC soaps, I don't think she has as much control at GH, as she did on SB, GL, AW, and OLTL. If you saw her GL and AW in particular, she improved the sets, the lighting was dramatically delicious, and the music was perfect. AW especially looked cheap as hell before she came aboard. Maybe GH isn't her type of show (well it isn't!). However, she's very good when it comes to glam soaps, her work on SB is a true testament to that.

Yeah, before the new system, she ROCKED at her bloc voting skills. LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 21 2007, 11:53 PM)
People talk about her great producing skills, but she's done a horrible job at GH. The show is dark, the sets are forgettable, the clothing and hairstyles are abysmal. What is she doing that is so great? Throw in the revolting firings of Kristina Wagner, Anna "Nobody Has a Lifetime Contract" Lee, Kari Wuhrer & Lesli Kay for getting pregnant and not doing everything in her power to get Genie Francis back full time.

The only thing I like about her is the bloc voting.

i disagree. i tghink GH is lit and dark at the right times for the right scenes. as far as soap sets o i think GH is pretty good, tho still forgettable as all soap sets are almost, and GH had someof the best dressed and best hair, IMO.

I dotn think shes the best - in no way at all. but there are worse.

as for those firings, KW i will give you. AL, its a hot topic in the soap world but i agree - no one should have a lifetime contact, thats stupid and a waste of budgett. KW was an awful actress in an awful role and should have been let go. and LK's Lois was so comic book it was sick. But i do feel BF had a much larger part in these firings than she did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy