Jump to content

Another Vet Leaves GH


Recommended Posts

  • Members

WHen was she put on recurring? One thing I always have respected AMC for (well besides the Julia Barr mess) is they usually treat their old actors who have served the show well with the respect they're deserved--Palmer always seems in worse and worse shape when I see him and is used sparringly but they kept him on contract (ditto Myrtle--and they kept Ruth Warrick on contract until she passed away). It could be argued that these contracts are costing the show money it can't afford but I think it's a respect thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What I don't like abotu recurring is it usually means we see less of a character (I guess tha't sobvious but bear with me). ie if they have a character on contract they'll be mor elikely to have them in "throaway" scenes--you know if someone goes to someone's house and the mother is on contract she might be there briefly but if she's on recurring and it means payign the actress they'll just not have her--losing some fo the sense of reality and community a soap needs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And in Stuart Damon's case, they didn't just fire him, they dragged it out. Killed off Alan and used him as a ghost until his contract ended. Talk about the pendulum swinging overhead. You get dumped and then spend all those months still working knowing that you're going to get dumped at the end.

I've only watched sparingly, when some of my former faves returned, but isn't Monica basically the next Audrey at this point? The older Quartermaines seem to have been rendered superfluous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This sucks. But it wasn't like Stuart Damon where he was showed the door. She may have been offered recurring and she turned it down or she simply wanted to retire. We don't know. I do hope that she will come back on occassion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They could have written it into the show. All it would have took is one eppy. They could have had Audrey retire on screen. She put in 40 years at GH. Or at the very least she should have gotten some kind of acknowledgment from the show that she retired. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Correct me if I'm wrong, but when GH celebrated one its anniversaries a few years back, they had Audrey celebrate a record number of shifts at the hospital, but Rachel Ames was RECURRING then. I don't see why they couldn't have asked her back for ONE day and just say she's retiring and moving to Florida or something or just simply MENTION it, without her there. She's put in too many years at this show for her character to simply be ignored like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't blame Rachel Ames whatsoever. GH, Brian Scott Frons, Jill Farren Phelps, Robert Guza should all be ashamed of themselves. She should've never been taken off contract in the first place, and since she's Elizabeth's grandmother, she should have had more family on the show and more airtime herself! So sad. I agree that GH should've written Ames's retirement into the show and given her a nice warm sendoff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy