Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Jack will drop to the middle 120's in the rankings with him probably missing Miami and IW where he has some points coming off...the rest are all first round loses...his major points came in November in Paris...so I doubt he will drop any further than #125.

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4192

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2412

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

Tsitsipas had already beaten Monfils before. I am surprised he lost to him. Monfils is all over the place and I can't take him serious as a tennis pro.  I wonder how many will play Rotterdam.....RBA pulled out of this weeks tourney....Raonic is still injured.....Pauille lost early this week....and Tsitsipas must still be exhausted from his Aussie run. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

Well, I watched the match and Monfils was focused, which is not always the case. Tsitsipas tried to take away his timing and it worked for a few points here and there, but Monfils is pretty speedy and caught on fairly quickly.

There were a few bad calls but they surprisingly went against Monfils.  Carlos Bernades wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed out there today, if anyone was tired, surely it was him.

Monfils came out very aggressive, came into net often--he played the type of tennis he's always been capable of but doesn't always put into motion.  Also, Monfils mixed up the pace and ultimately, messed with Tsitsipas' timing on the ball.  At times, it seemed as if he was beating Tsitsipas at his own game.

They had only played once before, so perhaps Monfils learned from that and knew what to expect and how to play him this time.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
  • Members
Posted

I guess it's his one great match of the year....He has tanked so matches in his career that's its not even funny anymore from Berdych to others. When I thought he would beat the other player. I guess something motivated him this weekend because he more often than not doesn't give a damn.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

Interestingly enough, the crowd seemed to be with Monfils.

I don't underestimate any player who has been in the Top 10. 

 

 

 

I've heard the Kyrgios has also withdrawn.

...but that can't really be a surprise to anyone, can it?

Edited by DramatistDreamer
  • Members
Posted

Does anybody know why folks think Medvedev is trash?  I know Fucsovics has become popular but I have noticed a lot of negative feedback about Medvedev.

 

 

Strycova looks like she's sitting in a booster seat.

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

A commentator once said "He brings his opponents' games down to his level, he makes them play badly".

Please register in order to view this content

 

I watched a few games (very few) of Fed Cup specifically AUS vs. USA and both Madison Keys' and Sloane Stephens' performances in Fed Cup are the reason why I really cannot invest in either of them.  

Keys was up 3-0 on Ashleigh Barty and had she held serve, Keys would've been up 4-0.  

I leave for a few minutes and return and it's 3-1.  I figure, well, Keys is still up a break but clearly Barty got one of the breaks back.

I leave again, this time for longer.  I return, Barty is up 5-3.  Me: "Keys is totally gonna lose this, isn't she?" 

Checking back and the match is over.   Me:  "Australia figures they can win this now, Madison really must've lost". 

Keys was supposed to be the leader of this team, since she is the highest ranked player on today's squad but just like when Stephens was supposed to be the leader, she flopped. 

Now, it's up to CoCo, I mean Collins to rescue the tie for the US.

Last time around, when the U.S. won the Fed Cup a couple years ago, it was supposed to be Sloane's team but CoCo ended up putting in the work to win the final.

Edited by DramatistDreamer

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      date: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 | Jamey Giddens, Danielle Paige | Steven Williford Samantha, accept the fact you were in the wrong and do not deserve your digital devices. Do not like it? Go upstairs. Read a book. Do some knitting. Bradley and Martin's "we get it" to Tyrell was hilarious and absolutely a parent's thing to do. Loving a bit of history of both the Duprees (via Eva) and the Hawthrones (via Izaiah). So cute. Poor June. I am sure she did not purposefully mean to mess up; we have all been there working in customer service. Shake it off and keep on keeping on! Not twice a week for Vernon's cobbler order... Sharon must be using that as payment for their meetings. I appreciate that Ted still cares about the Duprees despite the end of his marriage to Nicole. Not Dana using Peaches' crisis as a way of taking Ted's attention away from a co-worker. Girl, do not be so obvious. Bradley is a man after my own heart with a simply divine chocolate milkshake. That is the way to go. Dana really needs to dial it back. Money will not buy her everything she wants and she will realise it soon enough. And I doubt Shanice is scared off by her idle threats, either. "With all due respect, Ms Thomas, this isn't a shopping mall." Oh, Dr Wilkes just owned Dana's arrogant ass. I love it. Wigs and personas? Okay now, Shanice ate with that read. I like that June assured Bradley that she will not replace him or Martin in the twins' lives. And that blood does not make a parent. Words never rang more true. Jessica reading Samantha was amazing. Dana would want to involve Ted. Her obsession is crossing beyond dangerous boundaries. Not Dana catching Vernon leaving Sharon's room at the country club. That is not good. Not good at all! Notes: Ugh. Not another breakdown from writer2. This week was going so well. Thankfully, Paige is an outstanding scriptwriter (one of this soap's best), and her words today are excellent. The food at Orphey Gene's does look bomb, so I do not blame any of the characters for uptalking it. I would eat there daily if I could. And gain hundreds of pounds, too. David Lami Friebe (Izaiah) continues to make me sick watching him, but he is nice to listen to. I still really like having June as the central person hub at Orphey Gene's. That familiar face you see when you walk in and have scenes. Dana wanting a second opinion means we could have an incoming doctor, right...?
    • Thank you for tagging me!!!!! And thank you to Soapdope78. It is wonderful!!!!
    • Credits for Tuesday, November 18, 2025: Created by: Frank & Doris Hursley Executive producer: Frank Valentini Head writers: Elizabeth Korte and Chris Van Etten Writers: Micah Steinberg; Scott Sickles and Cathy Lepard Director: Kate Mansi
    • Writers: Jamey Giddens Danielle Paige Director: Steven Williford
    • I am sure "no one cares" and it's not a big deal to some people, but this thread is full of certain posters calling out women's ages, their viability to have children at like 35, and their nail polish, but we celebrate everything Chandler Massey does and applaud any male shirtless scenes.  And then posters walk back being like it's just a joke and weren't serious lol.
    • I'm so glad she's still on the show. Seems like she may have dropped a hint about the real source of conflict between her and Dee, too. 
    • I don't know how reliable the information is, but from what I've read, he joined GH in 1977, and Alan (who started airing in September 1977) was one of his creations. That should have been enough time to get the show in better shape by the January 1978 episode we saw, but then again, shifting from a 30 minute to a 60 minute format is a big transition, one that requires a lot of filler scenes like Monica having a long flashback to a scene that must have only played out a few weeks earlier. 
    • I agree. She said, "I do," and then decided, "I don't." I wish Nikki Abbott had been a longer duration. I wholly prefer Nikki with Jack than I ever have with Victor, and today's episode proved that. And I never minded Ashley with Victor.
    • That one really bothered me. The chemistry was still very much there and then she married Jack and immediately ran off to find Victor. It was such a slap in the face to anyone that was a fan of the pairing.
    • Some of those 1988-ish episodes are up. I'm not really sure she did much else. I think I recall something along the lines of she and Rusty had been suspended over the investigation of Nicky, George's supplier. I'm not sure she even gets some kind of goodbye. I think she just disappeared when Pam Long returned.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy