Jump to content

AMC: New SOD.com interview with head writers


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the story could be compelling - I just wish the actors were stronger. I know many here are fans of Alicia Minshew...I just don't think she's fantastic. Appealing, attractive, yes...just not a Cady McClain or Julia Barr or even a Kelly Ripa caliber actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they are mimicking a good concept. Meaning one incident leads to a chain reaction of incidents affecting everyone involved. No it's not as socially relevant as Crash was, but it is in it's own way. B&E are bringing attention to cochlear implants, even going as far to have JQ Depaiva appear on New Beginnings. I think the concept for the story is good and further down the line it could be better, as long as they don't delineate from the original concept of the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course they are. No-one said they weren't ripping.

It's that Claire Labine and Harding Lemay often emphasised the danger of copying movies and how lethal that may be. Claire talked about the other part of the coin of Monty's legacy (bringing film to soaps) - what she did was good, but it became a nightmare when everyone copied it.

No need to be rude there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Say what you want, but AMC's current crop of actresses aren't as strong as their predecessors. Lish, Sabine, and Melissa are nowhere near the talents of Cady and Julia.

There's a reason why Cady and Julia are multiple Emmy winners and the three that I've mentioned before aren't as well respected...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know what I meant. LOL!

In terms of critical acclaim, the actresses on the show aren't as highly regarded as say Cady or Julia.

Cady and Julia are powerhouse actresses, fact is, AMC doesn't have any of those caliber actresses these days. It's pretty sad, since AMC used to be superb in the casting department.

NONE of the actresses utilized on the show today are powerhouses imo, in fact, they all have their moments, but as whole they're pretty weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like Alicia Minshew a lot, but one bad story where she came between the almighty Zach and Kendall doesn't mean you have to put down Cady McClain for the next twenty years. She is AMC royalty and deserved better from the show. kthnx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, I don't see any of the Fusion girls becoming the next Maura West or Jennifer Finnigan or Cynthia Watros or Robin Christopher. But they had two popular, brilliant, incredibly deep and nuanced actresses under their noses, and they fired them. B&E can try and work their magic, but I think this show will continue to flounder without a stronger group of heroines (and hopefully, a little older and with more life experience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Aside from possibly Melissa Claire Egan, none of the current leading ladies on the show are really great actresses. Melissa, to me, is single-handedly turning Annie into a great fixture on the show. However, Eden Riegel needs to return. Cady McClain needs to return. And Julia Barr MUST come back, it's ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lish is one of the better actresses on the show. Cady was just shudderworthy, that's probably why I liked her as Rosanna better, I always felt she phoned it in as Dixie even before she left to go to ATWT.

Sydney Penny is great, but never seen. MCE is awesome. Sabine *shudders* worst recast ever IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy