Members Soaplovers Posted November 23, 2023 Members Share Posted November 23, 2023 The reason why Dynasty worked was because the writing and performers played it as non-camp.. and that was why it was such a memorable over the type campy show. Fresno was all camp and played too broadly. The key to good camp is to play it straight, have a relatable story, and have characters you care about. Fresno offered none of that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted November 23, 2023 Members Share Posted November 23, 2023 You've just described the difference between James Reilly's DOOL & Ron Carlivati's DOOL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted November 23, 2023 Author Members Share Posted November 23, 2023 (edited) When I think of classics Roots, Holocaust and Malibu come to mind. Edited November 23, 2023 by Paul Raven 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted November 23, 2023 Members Share Posted November 23, 2023 (edited) Sure, I would definitely add Roots & Holocaust. I know nothing about Malibu. I take it you don't consider Sho-Gun & Thornbirds? Here's an interesting list of the top 145 mini-series. Sho-Gun is their #10. Roots is their #7. Might be a strange list. https://www.ranker.com/list/miniseries-tv-shows-and-series/ranker-tv I don't know if you recall or not but I like to catch Bing Chat (AI) in errors. I asked it if Sho-Gun, The Thornbirds & Bare Essence would be considered among the best miniseries. Its reply And, for references it gave imdb & paste magazine's website & YouTube. YouTube? Paste has a list it calls The Best 1980s miniseries that changed television & it lists 3: Sho-Gun, The Thornbirds & Lace. https://www.pastemagazine.com/tv/list/best-famous-1980s-miniseries-shogun-the-thorn-birds-lace Edited November 24, 2023 by Donna L. Bridges 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted November 23, 2023 Members Share Posted November 23, 2023 I'd say that's exactly right. Carol Burnett & Company played their campy material as "boulevard comedy" in Fresno, which effectively butchered the camp component. The cast of Dynasty played their campy material as "straight drama", with hilarious results. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 I would, too. Like @Soaplovers said, the key to good camp is to play it straight (no pun intended). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 This is my opinion also. It always has been. There is an elevation when it comes to farce, satire, parody & the bottom line is its being played genuinely, authentically, even earnestly, and that is how you get the desired result, like camp. When you play to it & do not play it seriously, you get some pretty cheap claptrap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 Like John Waters says, "Camp doesn't know it's camp." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 (edited) Sontag said, "You can't camp about something you don't take seriously. You're not making fun of it, you're making fun out of it." Edited November 24, 2023 by Donna L. Bridges more 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted November 24, 2023 Author Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 To me that was a campy type comment. Hence my reply. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 Okay, I see. Camp was not my intent in this instance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members j swift Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 (edited) It is also ironic that Dynasty was seen as campy fun even while it aired, because it seemed so excessive in every way. For example, shoulder pads were in style, "In times of insecurity and instability, shoulder pads are like armor.“ But nobody was wearing leather cocktail dresses with matching furs and hats to the office like Alexis and Dominque. However, today, one often sees pop-cultural references to Dynasty as if it was an accurate representation of the entire landscape of 1980s fashion. And shoulder pads have come to represent excess, when in fact, they were a reaction to the recession. Please register in order to view this content Edited November 24, 2023 by j swift 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 It's also difficult to determine exactly when Dynasty veered into such camp. In the beginning, the show seemed fairly "normal" and "benign". But in one of the very first episodes -- I believe it was the pilot! -- we saw Blake, Fallon, and Steven having a gloomy family dinner at this 40-foot-long dining hall table that looked like something from King Arthur's court. The writers appeared to believe that small, wealthy families eat their weeknight dinners in a Mead Hall. None of the principals made any comment about why they were eating at such an ELONGATED table when there were only three of them. It was a weirdly campy scene in an otherwise down-to-earth episode. Alexis, of course, entered as a somewhat outrageous character who brought an undeniable element of camp into the proceedings, but it seemed a deliberate choice to place a high-camp villainess among the more "grounded" characters. As the years went by, though, everyone in the cast seemed to strive to attain Alexis's level of "dramatic outrageousness", and the whole thing became an often hilarious spoof of 1980s Americana excess. It almost seemed to happen by accident, with the writers, producers, directors, and actors blissfully unaware of the absurdity of the overly-dramatic and cliché-riddled scenes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members j swift Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 (edited) Please register in order to view this content My immediate impulse is to say Alexis and Krystal's first catfight in s2ep29 "The Baby". Because it set the tone that everything was going to be treated like a cartoon, even the loss of Krystal's baby. And the obvious use of male stuntmen was parodied all over TV. It is as if after the success of that scene, they felt the need to keep wrenching up. Then there was the catfight in pool, then the mud, and it became an annual tradition. Edited November 24, 2023 by j swift 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broderick Posted November 24, 2023 Members Share Posted November 24, 2023 That scene was definitely a memorable foray into absurdity! By about the third (?) season, the directors were even BLOCKING the scenes to maximize the humor. Two characters would toss out their predictably ridiculous lines -- "I will ruin you!" --- "I will see you in HELL first!!" -- "Is that a threat?!" -- "That's a PROMISE!!" -- and then the actor who was obviously about to be slapped would preen dastardly, with his/her cheek upturned for the impending blow, while the other character reeled back theatrically to sock him across the face. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.