Jump to content

All:Would soap operas survive and get better ratings if they all started at 3pm in the afternoon?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I want to know the posters opinions on this topic.What if the daytime soaps started airing at 3pm in the afternoon? Would it increase ratings? Would it Be a ratings disaster? Would it insure the viability of the genre?What is everybody's take on this? I want this topic to become a long thread if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It doesn't matter if they aired at 3 pm or 3 am. As long as they are penned by such incompetent writers and headed by such disrespectful executives, soaps will not survive regardless of the timeslot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they would get better ratings if they had a better time slot. More oppurtunities to catch veiwers in the evening then during the afternoon or morning. It would be more convient for veiwers to watch during the afternoon say 3-6 then now. IMO. More people work and times change.

No doubt the quality of the show affects the ratings but I don't think they would be as bad if they had a better time slot. But who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Danthig is onto something.

In Canada, Y&R airs after 4 pm in many markets. Indeed, it has aired as "day ahead" at 4 pm or 4:30 pm in the Toronto area since the 1970s...first on CHCH TV 11 and later on Canwest-Global TV network. To my knowledge, it is the hottest soap in the area, and very popular. I can personally say I got hooked all those years ago because it was an after-school/after-work thing I could enjoy with my family.

This is why I really, really, really want to know the SoapNet ratings (but can't find them anywhere). The SoapNet model, it seems to me, is brilliant...because it deals with the fact that the traditional soap viewer is no longer at home during the day. But, of course, it doesn't have wide distribution yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Never gonna happen. I hate to be Nora Negative in this make believe game, but still. ABCD's line up alone would take up the 3pm to 6pm block, so that means, definitely for my area (NY/NJ/CT Tri-State Metropolitan area), you're wiping out Eyewitness News at 5pm and only having a 30 minute block for local evening news between 6-6:30pm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder how the ratings are when the news is on?

Are they highly rated shows? I can't imagine anything from 4-7/8 being that big of a ratings winner. In many locations it's just repeats of syndicated shows like Friends, Everybody Loves Raymond, The Simpsons, Martin, ect. I'd be really disappointed if the soaps couldn't out do the ratings for repeat shows every body has seen atleast 5 times already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree. If you air two programs at different times you are going to get different results. If you air a show at 3 am and then air that same program at 3 pm you are going to get a different number of audiences. It's all about timing and competetion IMO. Sure quality is another biggie but I don't think ratings would suck so much if they had a more convienent time period. But then again I may be wrong. Who knows maybe GH and Days would get a .4 or .3 at 5:30pm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think American soaps need to adopt the British time slot model. In England and the rest of the UK the soaps air after 6pm and run for 30 minutes a piece. Granted with the terrible writing hitting soaps for the past decade or two the time slot issue doesn't really matter. I do think though that daytime is dead and that it is only a matter of time before audiences in the daypart erode to unrecognizable levels.

A previous poster is bang on about Y&R...in Canada it airs after 3 or 4pm and is the hottest thing on the air and is immensely popular as it works as a wonderful lead into the evening news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I lived in California in the late 80's, early 90's, the area I lived GH didn't start until 4 pm. I never understood why, but not sure if it did well or not at that time, but GH was very popular with the young crowd and alot were happy they'd get to watch GH after they got home from school, so it might have done pretty well at that time.

No I don't think a change in timeslot makes a difference, if the writing still sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It was one of the bigger disappointments that Sarah wasn't part of the book. 
    • They clearly loved her offcamera. I wish I could appreciate her work more, but...I don't. Thanks for telling me what Levin said at the end. I still don't think Carney was bad, but I guess he would always see them as not shining compared to Kate.
    • Around 2002, when I would have killed Alan, I'd bring back Amanda, who would have a love/hate relationship with Philip mirroring Alan and Alex, I'd have a proper Alex recast, I might bring back Alan-Michael (and maybe Hope or Mike on recurring), and I'd bring in a long-lost son for Philip who would be around his late teens or early twenties.  I agree that Philip would still need a rival. That's where giving Roger another long-lost kid (not Sebastian) could have worked in this timeframe.
    • @ranger1rg @DemetriKaneI was sure I was swimming upstream alone on this. I get that they are all proud to be Duprees, but the writers are just overplaying it. Ted's an ass, but presumably, he's been a model husband for the last 25 (?) years...but he just isn't good enough (or can handle or whatever..) a Dupree woman? *cough* I guess the next "shocker" is whatever Vernon and Anita's secret is. I hope it's something a little more original than him cheating on Anita.
    • Yes, that was probably to he case. In  the book, after Malcolm Groome (Pat) said he dated Kathleen Tolan,  he said he saw her theater work and found her to be  "compelling and charismatic actress"  In one of Ilene Kristen's many video interviews promoting the book, she also praised Kathleen.
    • David knowing Burke was going to die and making sure to say goodbye to him was very unnerving. Some of the last moments where David Henesy's otherworldly vibes from those first few years are put to good use. I agree that the few months right before 1795 are excellent. They do a great job with building suspense and going through insane twists.  DS was never going to be able to have a long run anyway, with the high burnout rate and a number of principal cast not likely to stay, but I do wonder what might have been if they had done a better job with the present day after the return from 1795. 
    • Off of the Xander/Paulina scenes in Thursday's episode, I really hope that means we're getting Theo coming home permanently. I didn't really see much of Cameron Johnson in the role, and though he was pretty and I'm thankful for his occasional thirst traps on Insta, Kyler Pettis could not act, so a brand new recast would be fine by me, but if you all think Cameron doesn't a real shot, I'd be fine with that, too. I just want Theo to be taken seriously as a character for once and make his place on this show like he deserves. I was annoyed the second Susan showed up again, but I do admit it was interesting to see her reunite with Marlena and see their dynamic when EJ joined them. Hopefully now we're done with her forever. As for John, this last bit of hope Marlena is getting before the inevitable is already so devastating. This is going to be so hard to watch. Xander reminding the audience he IS a cold blooded murderer, point blank. Paul Telfer was devilishly terrifying. Taking off his jacket was such a sexy power move. That Philip doesn't have a permanent dent in his face will be a miracle. It'll be interesting if it'll just be the one punch or if next week will see Philip more battered and bruised. How bad are they going to make Xander look? I will say, the best part of this story is that I'm not rooting for one over the other. How Philip reacts to this violence will be interesting. I also liked how everything with stealing the drug ended up. Very messy. Steve even made me laugh at one point, and I've been indifferent to him for years. I hope poor Kevin doesn't get scapegoated, but it'll be nice to see him presumably reunite with Shawn next. We'll be really lucky if Belle somehow crosses paths with him, too.
    • I've really been enjoying seeing him/Smitty interact with other actors/characters
    • She didn't want a hotel room; doubt she's going to want the apartment room, either. There was no reason to re-arrange the other one. This was the most logical move.
    • I just hope they don't move that lady in their apartment. Same. And Mike seemed to enjoy those scenes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy