Jump to content

3 newbies that we dont care about leaving OLTL


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The contract thing isn't an equal thing. New stars have a very different contract now at ABC, which is more a "pay when you work" contract, not a guarntee to get paid for X number of shows a week regardless of what is worked. So it's really not a trade off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Carlivati doesn't have the authority to get rid of actors. That's strictly a Frons/Valentini call. The most Carlivati could do is submit reasons why he wants to write out certain characters. If the higher, higher ups don't approve, then he's stuck writing for them.

Also, it isn't the newbies (if you can even call someone like Paige a "newbie" at this point) that caused the departures of PC and REG. TPTB wanted to resign REG, but didn't agree to the conditions that her camp put on the table, and in turn her camp didn't back down...and so she left. And as for PC goes, IMO his departure was inevitable. It had been looming for years. Back in 2004, they tried to get him to go on recurring status, but he refused and they caved. This time, though, they didn't.

As far as Andrea Evans goes, with Passions being picked up for Direct-TV, I heard that she was staying. Her stance has always been Passions first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sure hope since ONE LIFE has a new head writer that ONE LIFE will end up reconsidering basically firing Phil Carey(ex-Asa) and Renee Elise Goldsberry(ex-Evangeline) and hope they make a wonderful offer to Andrea Evans to return as Tina Lord, so that she'll leave PASSIONS. C'mon Andrea leave PASSIONS, ONE LIFE is a so much better show and Tina such a better role, Come Home!!

I'm a little saddened that Chris Beetem is being axed. I liked him as Jordan on ATWT and thought his character was interesting. There are rumors that he was hard to get along with and was fired. Sorry to see Randy Mantooth go to, since he's such a good actor. But makes sense to axe him since he's connected to Tate. Looks like both are members of One Pure People.

I'm sad to see Alex Neil(Paige) go. I've come to really like her as Paige. But if Paige's axing ends up giving Bo, Nora & Lindsay more airtime then that will be really great. I do like Nora & Lindsay a helluva lot more than Paige.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No way!!! While she would be great on either show, I find Passions to be much more enjoyable than One Life.

At least I'm not the only one! :lol: I wish they could've just put her on recurring status so that she could be the doctor to everyone and maybe not have a story all the time. That way, everyone could win!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is overall great news, but I don't get the clamor for returns. Returns are the last thing a new headwriter should focus on when they first come on. They should work on refocusing the canvas first, otherwise, the show can;t actually recover from it's decline. Old faces won't fix the problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think returns are the first thing that need to be done, but OLTL definitely needs a cast revamp and that shouldn't mean newbies. The recent writers have been extremely disrespectful to the core of OLTL and that needs to be fixed.

I'd like Cassie, Kevin, Kelly, Tina, maybe Cord and some others to return. These characters are actually needed and could give current cast members lots to do. The Cramer family could really use Cassie and Kelly especially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B)-->

QUOTE(Chris B @ Jun 6 2007, 10:55 AM)
This is a great first step, but there are so many more than need to go! nuMarty (unless Haskell returns) and I think Cole and all of those talentless teens need to go (except Langston). Scale Starr's story back and give her something family related. She's too young to carry her own story, IMO.

Also, Vincent needs to go and I'm sure many more but I don't watch OLTL regularly so I don't know all of them. I'd keep Layla (finally give her something to do), Talia, Nash and really thats probably it.

We need more legacy characters returning and the vets need to be front and center! If it weren't for these newbies Renee Goldsberry and Phil Carey would be on contract! This is why it is VITAL that you remove a crap headwriter. Once these actors are gone you may not be able to get them back.

I really like Christina Chambers as Marty, but that said I'd welcome Susan Haskell back if she returned. I have grown to like Brandon Buddy(Cole), he's gone from about mediocre to good now. I agree that the teens need to be scaled back though. But I'd keep Starr, Cole, Langston & Britney and maybe Amber, so Britney could have a pal (btw I think Portia Reiners is doing a good job as Britney). Phil Carey & Renee Goldsberry most definitely need to be brought back pronto.

I agree about Vincent. I'd also axe his bodyguard Sean, Miles and his hooker friend and Nash, maybe Michael & Marcie after the Todd/Tommy thing is played out. I'd put David back on contract too.

I sure hope Clint gets his REAL personality back under Carlivati too. This pod Clint is stupid. Clint would've never dated or had sex with Dorian in the first place with what she's done to Viki & Jessica and the rest over the years. I also hope Cat Hickland(Lindsay) gets put back on contract as well.

I totally agree with you about Higley!

B)-->

QUOTE(Chris B @ Jun 10 2007, 05:37 AM)
I don't think returns are the first thing that need to be done, but OLTL definitely needs a cast revamp and that shouldn't mean newbies. The recent writers have been extremely disrespectful to the core of OLTL and that needs to be fixed.

I'd like Cassie, Kevin, Kelly, Tina, maybe Cord and some others to return. These characters are actually needed and could give current cast members lots to do. The Cramer family could really use Cassie and Kelly especially.

I think that returns are MOST DEFINITELY needed on ONE LIFE, especially Asa, Kevin, Tina, Cassie, Evangeline & Kelly. Maybe alter down the line Cord, CJ & Max. In fact I'd just start off with Asa, Kevin & Evangeline. Later have Kelly, Tina & Cassie & Max return. Drop some more people to make room for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My concern about an influx of returns is, while it could be good to beef up the core families, I'm concerned with the current financial state of soaps today. Mind you, soaps seem to find mounds of cash out of nowhere, but still. I'd be more concerned with the current canvas- bringing Bo, Nora, Viki, Clint, Dorian all to the forefront, or at least actively supporting in a way that nods to history and not to a writer's agenda. Because, if that doesn't happen first, what good will returns do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, Ryan, you took the words right out of my mouth!!

I never quite got interested in Tate's story. I had nothing against Chris, in fact, I thought he did a good job, but I just couldn't get myself interested in yet another new character. Not to mention, the whole Rex trying to out him storyline was just bad, and it really made the character of Rex (who is one of the few I actually like) look really bad.

As for Paige, I liked Alexandra, but if Paige leaving Llanview means we'll finally start to see that Nora/Bo/Lindsay triangle we were promised, I'm all for it!

Now all OLTL has to do is get rid of the other 10 or so characters I hate and I might be able to enjoy a full week's worth of shows LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Making room for the McBains and Willaimsoms, DH/FV/BF ripped apart most of the existing families. The Buchanans are down to Clint, Bo, Matthew and sometimes Natalie, not the appealing clan with crochety Asa riding herd. The Kramers are down to Dorian and Blair -- Adrianna is neither fish nor fowl (Santi-Vega or Kramer). Viki's main purpose is to lament over her daughter's plight, and it's rare when Natalie/Jess even remember they are sisters. By choosing Dorian, Clint effectively separated the Lords/Buchanans. Gannons are gone, Williamsons ironically down to Layla. McBains are back to the two brothers with one wife -- and there is some speculation Mike and Marcie will be cut after the Todd, jr. reveal.

They will probably cut many of the newer characters who just aren't working. I don't think the show can continue to just push and prop not working characters. CC's Marty is not working as a lead, and Cole is too bland for Starr. Even giving John an insta-family isn't really tying him to the canvas, just isolating him further. Vincent has little purpose now within the OPP, and none outside. Layla is just as connectionless. I suspect Miles may get sacrificed as a psychotic villain for the November sweeps stunt. I suspect the TV Guide blurb about MG leaving had a grain of truth, and Ravenbeauty is talking about a male lead leaving as well.

This should free up some money, but I doubt OLTL has the budget for much. I suspect both TSJ and ME now get relatively huge salaries: hence REG was no longer affordable, and I suspect Carlivati was promoted as a desperate stopgap. THey don't have the budget to get a known new headwriter. Even DH must have been bargain basement.

There will be new faces on canvas. The major issue is will they provide and enhance story for Viki, Clint, Doria, etal, or will they become the story, as Spencer did? With Valentini and Frons still calling shots, I really doubt we'll see a sustained period with the older vets on the frontburner. Too many new faces too quickly got them into this mess. It probably will take an infusion of both returns and new characters to pull them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy