Jump to content

Y&R: Who Should Replace LML, When The Time Comes?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

^LOL! The sad thing is, I can see CBS giving Nixon more creative input, whereas ABC just ignores her. It really pissed me off when Kay said in her interview that they very rarely incorporate suggestions from Agnes. Um, who knows AMC and OLTL better than her?

This thread also got me thinking about how many great writers AMC and GL have shared in the past. It's weird that people like Agnes Nixon, Wisner Washman, Lorraine Broderick, and a few other staff writers in the past, have written for both shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Someone should definitely hire Nixon to at least consult on some of the soaps. Since ABC and Frons generally seem to ignore her, CBS should make her a consulting offer she can't refuse! Let's face it, she's probably too old to ever head write a show again, but I can definitely see her as a story consultant at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THANK YOU!

Finally a sane comment from a practical thoughtful observation of the situation.

HW's do not wreck these shows, it's the "blue slips" they get during the day with the latest demands

and suggestions from the people who sign the checks.

(a) Don't write for __________, he's arrogant and didn't come to my daughter's sweet sixteen.

(B) My mom says you should break up Ida and Louie and my teen says it would be way cool if space

aliens came up from the sea and threw a beach party.

© We got a few letters regarding that "gay thing" you wanted to explore. TONE IT DOWN.

(d) Hey yeah--about that "gay thing" you were exploring--it's not gonna work. CAN IT.

(e) Do the blacks have to be on the show every frick'n day and does Lily have to be so black? She's

married to Danny, and it would be less offensive to some folks if she was lighter. Hell, lighten up as many

of 'em as you can while you're at it.

(f) You don't like suggestions?

Well there's 10 other writers waiting in line to sit in that HW chair!

Now when you produce a 3.5, even if it's just for two weeks...then you can have more control of the

show. Until then, we got focus groups and we ain't exactly dumb and dumber ourselves. Get to writing

some ratings and cease with all the boring SUBTEXT.

We need some youth on that show! The demographics are showing it's not enough kids watching

--we're not getting any money from the advertisers if you don't get the kids tun'n in! Why don't you

do some "Saved By the Bell" stuff?

(G) Uh, yeah we know ________ is a great actor who's won two Emmys, but he's not exactly driving the

young girls wild. RECAST. We need a muscle-bound hunk in that role.

(H) If ___________ doesn't high tail it to the plastic surgeon and get some of that age off her face soon--I want you

to backburner that cow. She's starting to look too much like a real woman. Hell, we can see a real woman anywhere.

We want FANTASIES when we tune into daytime. That's why these shows need more of us MALE execs in charge--we

really know what people want. More of these babes need to fall in love with their rapist and we need more EVENTS,

it's all about ratings and money, people....ratings and money.

Stop listening to these whining ass soap fans.

When they bring us some ratings and money--THEN they can be listened to.

"Sir, Agnes Nixon's on line one. She's got a super suggestion about Pine Valley."

Agnes Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least you can be honest with yourself and other people and say – no, I don't wanna write your cr*ppy stories, I want something of mine, and leave if you're not allowed to do that. It's called integrity. And for the classiest soap (at least once it was) I want a person who has that character trait.

This is such a lousy excuse, I can't believe, IMissDrusilla, you mentioned this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excuse me Sylph...but there are many personnel (myself included) who have done just what you just suggested.

That's why you don't see, for instance--Pam Long or Nancy Curlee---working anywhere.

It's not that they don't want to. Pam Long's hand has been itching for seven years! But she refuses to work

within the SYSTEM.

That's also why Ria Rowell left "Y&R".

That is why Harding Lemay refused countless offers to "HW".

But then again, the people I just mentioned can AFFORD to say no.

The problem is that these writers have HUGE MORTGAGES, they have children to put through college,

they have ELDERLY PARENTS who need very expensive medical care, they've got debt on top of debt.

They have a ton of reasons why they MUST bring in the big bucks. And that's called survival.

A writer is a JOB. And writers have the right to do as their bosses tell them and get paid and just like

any other employee.

I wouldn't do it. But then...I don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, and I acknowledge that. :) I'm glad that you're, if you say so, one of those people.

I understand this, too. But Lynn Marie Antoinette is certainly not one of those people. Besides, she's probably loaded, since she worked all those years as EP or HW. Money can be spent easily, I know that, too, but she's secured her wealth, I'm not going to worry about that.

Yes, I know. But then again, if you're detemined, creative and know your stuff, you'll easily make it anywhere. I believe that. It might be extremely difficult at times, but one should never quit. :)

Idealism forever!  :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Headwriters are employees of the network. Unless they are Bill Bell or Brad Bell, they don't have autonomy over the shows that they write. I remember Brad Bell in an interview discussing the conflict that he encountered when discussing future stories with the network. His wider point was that the network executives had no understanding of how soap worked and often their dictates conflicted with the show's direction. Of course, LML is responsible for how poorly so many storylines are being executed, but the focus on specific characters may be network dictated and her fate will be decided by the demos. It is easy to talk about quitting a job or standing up for a principle when it isn't your livelihood at stake. I bet Alden thought that she was standing on principle with her writing when she was shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I disagree.  I think MVJ has set up each character in the cast with specific traits over the past few months, including Dani.  Now we are seeing each react to Nicole's situation in their own way.  Dani being loud, Martin being raging, Kat being indignant and comforting, Anita being encouraging, Vernon being loving, and Pamela just being there unquestioning. If Dani had become a wallflower, that would not have fit her character.
    • They did when they first met. They bonded over the awful green tuna casserole their mutual Grandma Jo served at family dinners.
    • I have a feeling we won't truly be seeing their stories until the fall; right now, what they've inherited is the mess of the "writer", per their own admission.
    • This evil woman is really gonna frame Eva for Laura's attempted murder. Wow
    • I stopped watching Days for several months because the show was cartoonish and dumb as hell as written by Ron.  I starting watching again in March and I am happy to see improvements in the day to day scripts. However, Paula and Jeanne will need to start telling bold and intelligent stories to keep me watching.  Stephanie the romance novelist and Sarah's allergies aren't going to cut it for me. I'm sure Bo's return and John's death will be engaging and emotional but it will take strong long term stories to turn this show around. I really hope they can do it.
    • A partial episode from June 1985 was uploaded - I don't think it's been up before. You get Susan Marie Snyder's brief appearance. In a lengthy set piece where Rick is going undercover in some punk bar, he introduces himself to her. There's a surprising moment where when she says her name is Sam, he is thrown and is about to ask a very personal question before she further explains that it is short for Samantha. Grant Show is one of those guys who is classically very good looking, but I'm not sure how often I've ever actually felt attracted to him. This episode is an exception. He just looks hot as hell in what they put him in and how they do his hair and face. I can't say I go back to this period of the show very often, but I certainly am glad I watched this one.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have no use for Derek but I was happy to see them exploring Naomi and Ashley's friendship again. More of that, please! I was stunned when Ashley asked Naomi about the Ted drama. We actually got a lot of interesting combos today. Tomas/Eva, Kat/Smitty, a rare Martin/Ted sighting and Vanessa/Nicole, among others. This was a good breather from all of the drama of the past few days. Because of pre-emptions I expected a random ending and not a proper cliffhanger but I literally jumped when I saw Leslie walk into Nicole's house! That was the perfect way to end things and along with the prevent, I'm excited to finally get back to a full 5 episodes next week!
    • I’m not going to take Dani seriously going off on Ted when she was willing to overlook all of Bill’s affairs in her own marriage and only got her feelings hurt when her ass was left. Absolutely hate that she’s getting a dedicated showcase scene like that - I think this is where MVJ’s personal friendship with Karla Mosley removes objectivity when writing for Dani as a character sometimes. 
    • @slick jones An episode (maybe the only episode?) of Susan Marie Snyder's Ryan's Hope stint has popped up. June 1985. Her character's name is Samantha. I'll post the video in the show's thread. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy