Jump to content

April 23-27, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

ATWT deserves those poor numbers. The show was horrible last week. It was all Gwen/Cleo 24/7. Craig was only featured on one day. What is it going to take for changes to be made at ATWT. This is ridiculous! The current storylines arent working and changes arent being made.

Days a 2.1 ......cant believe everyone is so happy about it. The ratings still stink. Love all the excuses for their low numbers last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

You can't fault DAYS fans for talking about THEIR show's ratings.

If GL fan or ATWT fan or GH fan or AMC fan or PSNS fan or Y&R fan or B&B fan or OLTL fan wants to see more discussion about THEIR show's ratings, then why don't you START talking about it instead of whining about DAYS fans. It's up to you to start talking about your show and if nobody wants to talk about your show, well that's too bad then. LOL ;)

This is a free for all thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I don't think people are happy because of that 2.1 as to think it's a good rating, but people are happy cause DAYS finally DIDN'T hit a new low.. simple as that... no one is saying it's a great rating.. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really happy for DAYS. It's the only soap I really enjoy these days.

GL is a mix bag for me. However I enjoy this soap more than any of the soaps in the top 5. It's great to see both GL and Days rise. I hope they can keep this momentum. Especially Days. They deserve to be so much higher.

I watched GH last week and I can honestly say that I enjoyed the show for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm happy for Days and for OLTL (although I'm conflicted on OLTL because the writing has been horrendous).

By the way, Drew Hamilton, I like your avatar. I've been a little embarassed to admit I've grown to like Willow. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beachbum

AlwaysAMC is just kidding. Sadly they do not know a good soap and choose to watch the "other" shows.

As for "whinning and not posting about the ratings of OUR shows, I am not saying that DOOL fans do nto have paasion, but its the same crap every week.

I just do not understand it I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MONDAY, APRIL 23, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.2/5,517,000 (-46,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 3.0/3,916,000 (+298,000)

3.(3) GH: Monday: 2.8/3,748,000 (+487,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Monday: 2.6/3,486,000 (+462,000)

5.(4) AMC: Monday: 2.5/3,182,000 (+91,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.3/3,022,000 (+167,000)

7.(7) GL: Monday: 2.1/2,769,000 (+331,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Monday: 1.9/2,440,000 (+232,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.3/1,548,000 (+84,000)

TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.1/5,461,000 (-56,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.9/3,869,000 (-47,000)

3.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.6/3,426,000 (-322,000)

4.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.5/3,275,000 (+93,000)

5.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.5/3,258,000 (-228,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.3/3,139,000 (+117,000)

7.(7) GL: Tuesday: 2.2/2,950,000 (+181,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.0/2,458,000 (+18,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 1.3/1,546,000 (-2,000)

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.1/5,606,000 (+145,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.8/3,822,000 (-47,000)

3.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.7/3,400,000 (-26,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.4/3,279,000 (+21,000)

5.(4) AMC: Wednesday: 2.5/3,252,000 (-23,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.2/3,113,000 (-26,000)

7.(7) GL: Wednesday: 2.1/2,830,000 (-120,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,769,000 (+311,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.4/1,776,000 (+230,000)

THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.2/5,517,000 (-89,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.9/3,715,000 (-107,000)

3.(3) GH: Thursday: 2.8/3,605,000 (+205,000)

4.(5) AMC: Thursday: 2.5/3,225,000 (-27,000)

5.(4) OLTL: Thursday: 2.4/3,087,000 (-192,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Thursday: 2.2/2,841,000 (-272,000)

7.(7) GL: Thursday: 2.1/2,747,000 (-83,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Thursday: 2.2/2,601,000 (-168,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.4/1,717,000 (-59,000)

FRIDAY, APRIL 27, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.0/5,389,000 (-128,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 3.0/4,066,000 (+351,000)

3.(3) GH: Friday: 2.9/3,840,000 (+235,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Friday: 2.5/3,294,000 (+207,000)

5.(4) AMC: Friday: 2.4/3,133,000 (-92,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Friday: 2.3/3,107,000 (+266,000)

7.(8) DAYS: Friday: 2.2/2,880,000 (+279,000)

8.(7) GL: Friday: 2.1/2,787,000 (+40,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.5/1,844,000 (+127,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy