Jump to content

April 16-20, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am very surprised ATWT's numbers didnt go up. It was a great week! We had more vets on and I truly enjoyed last week. I just dont get it.

Wow, Days at a 1.9....Ouch! Never did I think I would see them in the 1's. Very shocking! I wonder if it will continue to free fall next week to another low?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't want to jinx it but surely DAYS can go only up from here. I can understand last week hitting another low because the balance still sucked but this week has featured all of the big 4 as well as nice romantic scenes with LUMI/Shelle and a break from the EJ show. If it hits another new low, then that will suggest that these numbers are whacked and there are non-storyline factors causing the drop (NBC's announcement, affiliates moving timeslots etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow! I'm really shocked by Days' ratings. I know I stopped watching it live and now watch the late showing on SOAPnet, but I my goodness, I didn't expect a 1.9! I'm hoping that the ratings go up some in May, but I doubt it'll be a big enough rise to get them out of hot water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Date..HH Rank..Rating..Share..18-49 Rating..18-34 Rating..Total Viewers

1/1/07.......*3.....2.7.....08.....2) 1.9/11...*1) 1.7/10.....4) 3,357,000

1/8/07.........4.....2.7.....09.....3) 1.9/11.....1) 1.8/11.....4) 3,522,000

1/15/07.....*4.....2.7.....08.....3) 1.9/10.....1) 1.7/10.....4) 3,647,000

1/22/07.....*4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10...*1) 1.5/09.....5) 3,233,000

1/29/07.....*4.....2.6.....09...*2) 1.8/11.....1) 1.8/11.....4) 3,379,000

2/5/07.......*6.....2.5.....08...*4) 1.6/09...*2) 1.5/09.....7) 3,274,000

2/12/07.......7.....2.5.....08.....5) 1.6/09.....3) 1.5/09.....7) 3,252,000

2/19/07.....*6.....2.4.....07.....5) 1.5/09.....3) 1.3/08.....7) 3,001,000 <--- New low 18-49, 18-34

2/26/07.......7.....2.3.....08.....5) 1.4/09...*4) 1.2.08.....7) 2,929,000 <--- Ties low HH rating, New low 18-49, 18-34

3/5/07.......*7.....2.1.....07.....5) 1.4/09.....5) 1.1/08.....7) 2,840,000 <--- New low HH Rating, New low 18-34, New low Total Viewers

3/12/07.......7.....2.2.....08...*5) 1.3/09...*5) 1.1/08.....7) 2,918,000 <--- New low 18-49

3/19/07.......7.....2.2.....08...*5) 1.3/09.....3) 1.2/08.....7) 2,738,000 <--- New low Total Viewers

3/26/07.......7.....2.1.....08...*4) 1.4/09.....2) 1.3/09.....7) 2,774,000

4/2/07.......*7.....2.1.....07.....5) 1.3/09...*2) 1.3/08.....8) 2,610,000 <--- New low Total Viewers

4/9/07.........8.....2.0.....07...*5) 1.3/09.....3) 1.2/08.....8) 2,625,000 <--- New low HH Rating

4/16/07.......8.....1.9.....06...*6) 1.2/08...*2) 1.1/07.....8) 2,442,000 <--- New low HH Rating, New low 18-49, New low Total Viewers

MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.2/5,517,000 (-29,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 3.1/4,084,000 (-162,000)

3.(3) GH: Monday: 2.5/3,500,000 (+132,000)

4.(4) AMC: Monday: 2.6/3,419,000 (+199,000)

5.(6) OLTL: Monday: 2.4/3,359,000 (+457,000)

6.(5) ATWT: Monday: 2.4/3,253,000 (+87,000)

7.(8) GL: Monday: 1.9/2,711,000 (+144,000)

8.(7) DAYS: Monday: 2.0/2,632,000 (SAME)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.4/1,728,000 (-65,000)

TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2007

U.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.9/5,440,000 (-77,0000)

U.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.9/4,001,000 (-83,000)

U.(4) AMC: Tuesday: 2.5/3,170,000 (-249,000)

U.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.3/2,904,000 (-596,000)

U.(7) GL: Tuesday: 1.9/2,476,000 (-235,000)

U.(8) DAYS: Tuesday: 1.6/2,179,000 (-453,000)

U.(U) ATWT: Tuesday: Pre-Empted

U.(U) OLTL: Tuesday: Pre-Empted

U.(U) PSNS: Tuesday: Pre-Empted

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 2007

1.(U) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.2/5,605,000 (+165,000)

2.(U) B&B: Wednesday: 2.8/3,644,000 (-357,000)

3.(U) GH: Wednesday: 2.8/3,484,000 (+580,000)

4.(U) AMC: Wednesday: 2.5/3,163,000 (-7,000)

5.(U) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.5/3,047,000

6.(U) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.1/2,867,000

7.(U) GL: Wednesday: 2.0/2,781,000 (+305,000)

8.(U) DAYS: Wednesday: 1.9/2,543,000 (+364,000)

9.(U) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.2/1,516,000

THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.1/5,192,000 (-413,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 3.1/3,951,000 (+307,000)

3.(6) ATWT: Thursday: 2.3/3,139,000 (+272,000)

4.(3) GH: Thursday: 2.5/3,108,000 (-376,000)

5.(5) OLTL: Thursday: 2.3/2,762,000 (-285,000)

6.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.2/2,759,000 (-404,000)

7.(7) GL: Thursday: 2.0/2,666,000 (-115,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Thursday: 2.0/2,524,000 (-19,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.4/1,700,000 (+184,000)

FRIDAY, APRIL 20, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.2/5,563,000 (+371,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.9/3,618,000 (-333,000)

3.(4) GH: Friday: 2.6/3,261,000 (+153,000)

4.(6) AMC: Friday: 2.4/3,091,000 (+332,000)

5.(5) OLTL: Friday: 2.3/3,024,000 (+262,000)

6.(3) ATWT: Friday: 2.2/2,855,000 (-284,000)

7.(7) GL: Friday: 2.0/2,438,000 (-228,000)

8.(8) DAYS: Friday: 1.7/2,208,000 (-316,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.2/1,464,000 (-236,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ditto Toups

Of course DAYS is also bringing PSNS down. The show is running on all cylinders right now and if DAYS was up in the 2.5-2.6 range, PSNS would be at a 2.0 or higher. I never thought I'd see the day when PSNS is only 800,000 viewers behind DAYS

8.(8) DAYS: Friday: 1.7/2,208,000 :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the risk of getting bashed again - DAYS deserves 1.9.

I admire the optimists in here for their continuing faith in the show and its ability to recover. I doubt very much bringing back Stefano and the Dimeras will turn things around, but who knows, you could all be right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup, Days is in big trouble! Not even GL has gotten those kind of numbers. Comparing Days to GL this week. GL stayed steady at 2.0 while Days tumbled. Is the writing on the wall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The supercouples might have been MIA but they are all more or less together, Patch and Kayla, Bo and Hope, Lucas and Sami even Shawn and Belle. The vets didn't suddenly disappear mid Jan. they had been bb for a while. Everyone wanted JER back at Passions and for DAYS to get a new writer and DAYS picked up 5 time Emmy award winning writer Hogan Sheffer.

In two weeks DAYS dropped from fairly consistent 4's to 7's and now 8's and IMO the writing has only gotten better. I say better not because the SLs are written to shock but because the acting seems stronger under Hogan and the SLs are character driven SLs.

If it wasn't Zucker's comment what was it that happened mid January? NBC makes daytime drama look like a dying genre and that isn't good any of the soaps. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is the real reason Days is down...

1/22/07.....*4.....2.5.....08...*3) 1.7/10...*1) 1.5/09.....5) 3,233,000

1/29/07.....*4.....2.6.....09...*2) 1.8/11.....1) 1.8/11.....4) 3,379,000

2/5/07.......*6.....2.5.....08...*4) 1.6/09...*2) 1.5/09.....7) 3,274,000

2/12/07.......7.....2.5.....08.....5) 1.6/09.....3) 1.5/09.....7) 3,252,000

2/19/07.....*6.....2.4.....07.....5) 1.5/09.....3) 1.3/08.....7) 3,001,000 <--- New low 18-49, 18-34

2/26/07.......7.....2.3.....08.....5) 1.4/09...*4) 1.2.08.....7) 2,929,000 <--- Ties low HH rating, New low 18-49, 18-34

ANDRE GIVES UP ON SON

3/5/07.......*7.....2.1.....07.....5) 1.4/09.....5) 1.1/08.....7) 2,840,000 <--- New low HH Rating, New low 18-34, New low Total Viewers

3/12/07.......7.....2.2.....08...*5) 1.3/09...*5) 1.1/08.....7) 2,918,000 <--- New low 18-49

3/19/07.......7.....2.2.....08...*5) 1.3/09.....3) 1.2/08.....7) 2,738,000 <--- New low Total Viewers

3/26/07.......7.....2.1.....08...*4) 1.4/09.....2) 1.3/09.....7) 2,774,000

4/2/07.......*7.....2.1.....07.....5) 1.3/09...*2) 1.3/08.....8) 2,610,000 <--- New low Total Viewers

4/9/07.........8.....2.0.....07...*5) 1.3/09.....3) 1.2/08.....8) 2,625,000 <--- New low HH Rating

4/16/07.......8.....1.9.....06...*6) 1.2/08...*2) 1.1/07.....8) 2,442,000 <--- New low HH Rating, New low 18-49, New low Total Viewers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy