Jump to content

Outstanding Drama Series & Outstanding Writing/Directing Team


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I'm sorry, but I just could NOT resist.

533f9f98f51.jpg

Where's John Black when you actually need him? Get the holy water!

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I find it funny that many on the board were "anxiously" awaiting someones take on GL's winning the Writing and show award.

Why? Who knows.

Do they even have a writing or producing credit to their name?

It was great that GL was noticed and WON...any real fan would acknowledge that and be happy for the show.

  • Members
Posted

It was sympathy win. The show sucks big balls!! A real fan would want only the best for the show. And David K is not giving us that. Today's pathetic show proved it. Hell, his whole year has proved it. He got an award for butchering the soap.

  • Members
Posted

Look at who he was competing against though :blink:

Not saying I think DK is the best out of the lot but really, nonw of the other nominees showed great writing either.

  • Members
Posted

As was stated MANY TIMES here, the Emmy's judge submissions based on TWO REELS. GL submitted tremendous reels, hence why they won. If the Emmy's judged on what happened on these shows during the entire year, it might have been another outcome.

  • Members
Posted

THANK YOU! Everytime someone mentions this, someone else keeps harping on about how much it sucks that DK got the writing award for all the damage he's done to the show. Thing is...that's NOT what he was judged on. It was simply about two episodes..which happened to be excellent submissions.

And I'd also like to add that if we applied the same logic that people who think GL's win is undeserved to the other categories, we'd be getting completely different outcomes as well (except maybe in the case of Lead Actress). Berman would have won over Landon, Bergman would have won over LeBlanc, Pelphrey or Hansis would have won over McClure...you get my drift...

  • Members
Posted

Honestly SJ, I think that is my problem. I see DK's writing as a whole, moreso than any individual episode. Plus, it is also a pretty well known fact that when the Writing category is judged, what is judged first and foremost is the dialouge, not necessarily the plotting, which is obvious since they cannot judge on the entire year. I suppose I can use that as some defense mechanism lol. It's not Kreizman, it's the script writer for that day. But oh well. That's just my $.02.

I'm really not sure why this matters. None of us have our names on the credits, but that doesn't stop any of us from raving or ranting.

Hell, I believe we (general we) are the MOST qualified to give our opinions about these shows. We are the audience. The consumers. In the end, we make or break a show. Many of us devote our lives to these shows, an hour a day.

In the end, however, we have different tastes. Some are applauding GL's win. Others are pounding their fists. I'm the latter. Neither extremes are necessarily correct, but that's all the fun, isn't it? SON wouldn't be so damn great without a little drama. Of course, our brand of drama is about ten times more exciting than anything these soaps have come up with in years lol.

  • Members
Posted

But you also know that people are judging two reels, not the writer's entire portfolio.

Really? Shouldn't the dialogue reveal something about the plot? If not, then what's the point of the dialogue in the first place? If it doesn't have one, it most likely shouldn't be submitted for a writing award.

I think the other person (forgot who made the original post) has a point, though. Isn't it other writers who are judging the writing category? Everyone can rant and rave, but obviously, some people will have more experience or objectivity to judge the work.

The consumer isn't always right. This is getting a tad overanalytical but as viewers, we have our own biases. If a character we hate were being played by a really great actor and being given great stories, it could very well still be considered crap writing

If we're to throw the Emmy rules about judging only two tapes, then I'm with you. But that's not reality.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy