Jump to content

October 17-21, 2005


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, in that case shouldn't we be hoping that NO SHOW ever wins back fans, since pretty much all nine of them have "screwed fans over" at some point in time?!

AMC fans have not liked the show for the most part this year, but the past couple of weeks have been impressive, and it's only natural that they will hope for a ratings spike. And I think DAYS fans feel the same way. DAYS is certainly NOT the only one of the nine soaps that has "screwed over" its fans in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Great post pranji. ITA with everything you said.there is no payoff to these terrible stories.I've been waiting for a decent payoff for 2 years now.I'm Just glad to see Days fall Like it deserves for its current 'stories' and I hope it will fall even more.Maybe then a real change will be made,starting by replacing JER as HW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC has been impressive the last couple of weeks. I have always had something to like but lately I've loved almost everything. If ratings continue flat through sweeps and into Christmas I expect in the new year heads will begin to roll at the Manhattan AMC studios......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with AgnesEckert that AMC has had some great episodes lately but there is no depth to the stories. It would have been much more compelling if Palmer, Opal, Joe, Stuart, Marian, and Brooke had really bonded with Di as Dixie and then found out the truth. The actors and scriptwriters made the scenes come alive, but the overall story is still shallow. Only JR's grief is palpable right now.

I do think it's funny that ABC promoted Ryan's return from the dead so much and the ratings were lower both Tuesday and Wednesday when the memorial scenes aired. :P If that isn't a signal to Frons/McTavish that Ryan isn't the hero of the show, I don't know what is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's hard to purposely hope for bad ratings for a soap, in hopes that things behind the scenes will change, because at this point in the game, it seems some networks would rather just throw in the towel altogether. That's definitely why I hope GL continues to hold steady (and dare I hope they move UP a tenth or two? Please?). DAYS has been better in the past few months compared to the storylines and the way the show was written in 2004 and the first half of 2005, so I don't feel as much that they "deserve" low ratings for what they're currently airing. Yet at the same time, if these poor ratings show the network that Reilly doesn't have a clue what he's doing anymore and they kick him out of Salem, that's GREAT! But we don't know what the powers-that-be at the network are thinking. They may just tell Reilly & Corday to pump up the sci-fi stories again. And THAT would suck. So it's hard knowing what behind-the-scenes changes could take place if a soap suffers low ratings. Overall, I just hate seeing so many soaps in the 2.0's, even if most of those soaps aren't delivering great material right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree. I feel the JER with the mind control storyline...and Glory Annie is SOOO JER, lol. And this three's company thing with Austin/Sami/Nicole? Yeah, it's not exactly Salem Stalker/Sci fi stuff but it's that kind of out-there thing that he would do. (And it's a parody of another show, of sorts, so there you have it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very traditional (1991 - 1993), but at that time he was only one of three head writers (Nancy Curlee and Stephen Demorest being the main writers he was paired with). This was the Harley/Mallet, Alan-Michael/Frank/Eleni, Roger/Holly/Daniel, Alexandra/Nick/Mindy era. VERY good soap opera. So he can do traditional, just maybe not acting alone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy