Jump to content

All: Soap Budgets


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This has been something that I have been thinking about a lot lately! Did anyone see last week THE VIEW where they did budget week, it was the second time this season...it got me thinking. What if soaps went on a budget week, you know!!

It chaps my #*$ to see where designers are like, "Uh-huh we got this at Macy's." Why don't they shop at Wal-Mart, Target, Sears, JCPenny's, Old Navy or Payless for starters. I mean you think about it...think of what everything costs! You could easily fit a woman, especially in a nice suit from Sears or Target and save on so much cash!! It just baffles me...Just a thought! I seriously think a study should be done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh no I meant they should be on a clothing budget for LONG TERM, it was named "Budget Week" on The View. I think if they would buy clothes from Wal-Mart or Target and then they could also advertise, not like they did with AMC perfume awhile back, but for example, if Kim Zimmer is wearing a Target getup there could be Target commercials:

"Look like diva.." or something. It would be so good I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some shows used to do that, the character would have their particular wardrobe with certain reused items of clothing, so it was actually similar to a real person picking clothing out of a real person's closet, as versus having the whole of Saks Fifth Avenue for their personal wardrobe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree that clothes are the way for soaps to economize. In 2000 ATWT did a funny little scene where Henry cross-dressed as Henrietta and had on a wig that resembled Colleen Zenk-Pinter's hair at the time. Henrietta said that she'd gotten her hair done "to look like Barbara on my soap opera." This scene is true. The shows are taped in New York and LA. We expect that we'll see actors and actresses wearing the latest fashions and having the latest hair-dos. I feel like soap characters are meant to wear the clothes we wish we could afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see your point Juppiter and it makes sense. But the soaps are crying cutbacks, budget, money issues and our faves or suffering...stories are suffering. Plus it maybe like what we would want to wear, but what if they were wearing things we could all wear. The money cuts backs are there! Ties ins to name brand stores who could buy commercial spots. I'm not saying everything has to be low budget but it could be an idea you know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my Sociology class, we were actually talking about how easy it is for people to "look" like their rich, even if they're actually in a lower class. There are a lot of clothes that look nice and are less than $20.

On soaps, I think they could actually save a lot of money if they started using cheaper-priced clothes. I know that some soaps already do that, but it depends. Then, we would be able to buy the clothes too (because I definitely can't afford something that came from Saks, but I could afford something if it came from Target.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree!

On this controversial issue, I'll give my two cents:

The poor people or middle class people on soaps SHOULD dress that way. THe rich people should dress that way that someone mentioned in this thread (look rich on a poor man's budget). It's all about realism. I don't want Marlena wearing KMart clothes. SORRY. Mimi, on the other hand, should shop at Wal-mart and BE SHOWN shopping at Wal-Mart (product placement brings $$, Days!) They could tie in shopping trips as product placements and make extra bucks and I don't see why they don't. It just makes sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy